Biases in a humorous talk show on religious conversion on youtube: Critical discourse analysis approach on “Pindah Arah” playlist
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v7i1.24503Keywords:
Religious freedom, Converts, Conversion, BiasAbstract
Violations of religious freedom, including the right of religious conversion, often occur in Indonesia, although the state constitution guarantees the right. Several kinds of research indicate that news media has produced discursive violations through texts with certain language styles. Nonetheless, the violation can also happen through humorous language style in social media. This paper aims to discover the discourse behind a humorous talk show on religious conversion in the “Pindah Arah” playlist on the Comedy Sunday YouTube channel, whether it entirely promotes religious conversion as freedom of religion or carries bias. The playlist, as well as the channel, is chosen as the only one that gives the stage for religious converts, either those who converted to Islam or from Islam, to tell their religious conversion in a humorous program on YouTube. This qualitative research uses content analysis, applying Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis method. The results of this study show that the videos in the playlist, on the one hand, show religious freedom, but on the other hand, they still carry the hosts’ majority bias. The bias is shown through word and analogy choices which frame conversion to Islam as positive and conversion from Islam as unfavorable. The bias is related to the social context among the social relationship between adherents of religions. This article argues that the playlist “Pindah Arah” of the Comedy Sunday YouTube channel implicitly violates personal freedom of religious conversion through aggressive humor and shows a contradiction between their slogan and jokes.
Pelanggaran terhadap kebebasan beragama, termasuk hak untuk berpindah agama, tidak jarang terjadi di Indonesia meskipun secara hukum hak tersebut dijamin oleh konstitusi. Banyak penelitian menunjukkan adanya pelanggaran tersebut, terlebih dari wacana yang dimuat dan diproduksi oleh media berita melalui teks dengan gaya bahasa tertentu. Meski demikian, pelanggaran itu dapat terjadi melalui gaya bahasa humor di media sosial. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menemukan wacana di balik talkshow lucu tentang konversi agama dalam playlist "Pindah Arah" di kanal YouTube Comedy Sunday, apakah itu sepenuhnya mempromosikan konversi agama sebagai kebebasan beragama atau membawa bias. Daftar putar beserta saluran tersebut dipilih sebagai satu-satunya yang memberikan panggung bagi para pelaku pindah agama, baik mereka yang masuk Islam atau keluar dari Islam, untuk menceritakan cerita pindah agama mereka dalam program humor di YouTube. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan analisis isi dengan menerapkan metode analisis wacana kritis Norman Fairclough. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa video dalam playlist di satu sisi menunjukkan kebebasan beragama, namun di sisi lain masih membawa bias mayoritas dari pembawa acara. Bias tersebut ditunjukkan melalui pilihan kata dan analogi yang membingkai konversi ke Islam sebagai positif dan konversi dari Islam sebagai negatif. Bias tersebut terkait dengan konteks sosial di antara hubungan sosial antara penganut agama. Artikel ini berpendapat bahwa playlist “Pindah Arah” secara implisit melanggar hak personal untuk pindah agama melalui humor agresif dan menunjukkan kontradiksi antara slogan dan candaan mereka.
Downloads
References
Agustina, & Adek, M. (2020). That Unjust God: Critical Discourse Analysis on the Violations of Religious Freedom. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE) (pp. 23–28). Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang. Retrieved 3 April 2023 from https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201109.004
Ahyar, M. (2017). Islamic Clicktivism: Internet, Democracy and Contemporary Islamist Activism in Surakarta. Studia Islamika, 24(3), 435–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v24i3.4859
Andalas, E. F., & Prihatini, A. (2018). Representasi perempuan dalam tulisan dan gambar bak belakang truk: Analisis wacana kritis multimodal terhadap bahasa seksis. Satwika: Kajian Budaya Dan Perubahan Sosial, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v2i1.7018
Arifianto, A. R. (2009). Explaining the cause of Muslim-Christian conflicts in Indonesia: Tracing the origins of Kristenisasi and Islamisasi. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 20(1), 73–89. Retrieved 6 January 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410802542144
BBC News Indonesia. (2016). Inilah kasus-kasus penistaan agama di Indonesia, ‘subjektif’ dan ‘ada tekanan massa’. Retrieved 6 January 2023, from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/trensosial-38001552
Bitterly, T. B. (2022). Humor and power. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 125–128. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.017
Budiawan, B. (2020). New Media and Religious Conversion Out of Islam Among Celebrities in Indonesia. IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 3(2), 189. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v3i2.51048
Cambridge Dictionary. (2023). Deviate. Retrieved 3 April 2023, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/deviate
Dunbar, N. E., Banas, J. A., Rodriguez, D., Liu, S.-J., & Abra, G. (2012). Humor used in power-differentiated interactions. Humor, 25(4). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2012-0025
Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. New York: Longman Inc.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Feener, R. M. (2017). Religious competition and conflict over the longue durée: Christianity and Islam in the Indonesian Archipelago. Asian Journal of Religion and Society, 5(1), 1–22. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07099955
Ferguson, M. A., & Ford, T. E. (2008). Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor, 21(3), 283–312. Retrieved 11 January 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014/HTML
Gentner, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Reasoning and learning by analogy: Introduction. American Psychologist, 52(1), 32–34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.32
Gordon, M. (2014). Friendship, Intimacy and Humor. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(2), 162–174. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2012.721732
Guttormsen, D. S. A. (2018). Advancing Otherness and Othering of the Cultural Other during “Intercultural Encounters” in Cross-Cultural Management Research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 48(3), 314–332. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2018.1480874
Haryatmoko. (2019). Critical Discourse Analysis (Analisis Wacana Kritis): Landasan Teori, Metodologi dan Penerapan (3rd ed.). Depok: Rajawali Press.
Herlianto, A. (2019). Dari Kolektor Besi Tua Hingga Sosok Religius: Stereotip Orang Madura Melalui Humor. Deskripsi Bahasa, 2(2), 155–164. Retrieved 6 January 2023 from https://doi.org/10.22146/db.v2i2.355
Human Right Watch. (2017). Indonesia: RUU ‘Pelindungan Umat Beragama’ Akan Membahayakan Kalangan Minoritas | Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 6 January 2023, from https://www.hrw.org/id/news/2017/07/20/306743
Ibn Manẓūr. (n.d.). Lisān al-‘Arab.
KontraS (Komisi untuk Orang Hilang dan Korban Tindak Kekerasan). (2021). Meninjau Pemulihan Negara atas Pelanggaran Kebebasan Beragama, Beribadah, & Berkeyakinan . Retrieved 6 January 2023 from Jakarta: https://kontras.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/KontraS_Meninjau_Pemulihan_Negara_atas_Pelanggaran_Kebebasan_Beragama.pdf
Laturhary. (2020). Kriminalisasi Berbau Penistaan Agama Marak, Komnas HAM Tawarkan Solusi - Komnas HAM. Retrieved 6 January 2023, from https://www.komnasham.go.id/index.php/news/2020/8/27/1537/kriminalisasi-berbau-penistaan-agama-marak-komnas-ham-tawarkan-solusi.html
Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. Retrieved 6 January 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. Retrieved 2 April 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2885.2000.TB00194.X
Miczo, N., & Welter, R. E. (2006). Aggressive and Affiliative Humor: Relationships to Aspects of Intercultural Communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35(1), 61–77. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17475740600739305
Muhshi, A. (2015). Teologi Konstitusi: Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia atas Kebebasan Beragama. Yogyakarta: LKiS Pelangi Aksara.
Muwahidah. (2020). National (In)security and Identity Boundaries: The Rise of Muslim Conservative Propaganda in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies, 5(1), 1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2979/jims.5.1.01
Nugroho, Y., & Syarief, S. S. (2012). Beyond Click-Activism: New Media and Political Processes in Contemporary Indonesia (Vol. FES Media Asia). Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Retrieved 6 January 2023 from https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/33805670/FULL_TEXT.PDF
Prakoso, B. (2021). Analisis Wacana Pemberitaan Pindah Agama Selebritas di Media Online (Master Thesis). Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Putri, L., & Hasfi, N. (2021). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Salmafina Sunan di Detik. com. Interaksi Online, 9(3), 68–74. Retrieved 2 April 2023 from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/31306
Rodriguez, C. (2000). Civil Society and Citizen’s Media: Peace Architects for the New Millenium. In K. G. Wilkins (Ed.), Redeveloping Communication for Social Change: Theory, Practice, and Power (pp. 147–160). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Sakina, C. D., & Purba, E. R. (2022). Mitos dan paradoks diskursus perempuan dalam film horor Kuime (Over Your Dead Body). Satwika: Kajian Ilmu Budaya, 6(2), 367–384. Retrieved 16 January 2023 from https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v6i2.22952
Tampubolon, M., & Aziz, N. A. (2021). Violating Christian Minority Freedom of Religion in Indonesia. The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society, 11(1), 235–253. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v11i01/235-253
Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humr, 11(2), 161–216. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1998.11.2.161
Zainuddin, M. (2019). Islam-Christian relations in Indonesia. Pertanika: Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2099–2107. Retrieved 16 November 2022 from http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/regular_issues.php?jtype=3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mufti Labib Jalaluddin, Zezen Zaenal Mutaqin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Satwika : Kajian Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Satwika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)