Systematic Literature Review: STEM Approach through Engineering Design Process with Project Based Learning Model to Improve Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v6i2.21150Abstract
The STEM approach is a learning approach that allows students to think creatively. Creative thinking is included in the skills of the 21st century, especially the 4C ability that students must have to be able to compete globally. This research aims to describe the STEM approach through EDP with the PjBL model and examine the impact of implementing STEM approaches through EDP with the PjBL model on students' creative thinking skills. This research is qualitative research conducted using literature studies. Data collection in this study was carried out by reviewing articles in national and international journals. STEM-EDP implementation with project-based learning can be done in group learning. The results of the study by referring to previous research related to STEM-EDP with project-based learning can be concluded that STEM-based project-based engineering through engineering design processes are able to provide influence to improve students' creative thinking skills.
Downloads
References
Abidin, J., Rohaeti, E. E., & Afrilianto, M. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Smp Kelas Viii Pada Materi Bangun Ruang. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(4), 779. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i4.p779-784
Aldabbus, S. (2018). Project-Based Learning: Implementation & Challenges. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 6(3), 71–79. www.eajournals.org
Amala, M. A., & Ekawati, R. (2020). The Profile of Horizontal and Vertical Mathematization Process of Junior High School Student with High Mathematical Ability in Solving Contextual Problem of Fraction. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 3(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v3n2.p52-60
Brown, R. E., & Bogiages, C. A. (2019). Professional Development Through STEM Integration: How Early Career Math and Science Teachers Respond to Experiencing Integrated STEM Tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9863-x
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26(October 2018), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Daugherty, M. K., & Carter, V. (2018). The Nature of Interdisciplinary STEM Education. 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5_12
Edmunds, J., Arshavsky, N., Glennie, E., Charles, K., & Rice, O. (2017). The relationship between project-based learning and rigor in STEM-focused high schools. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1618
Fajrina, S., Lufri, L., & Ahda, Y. (2020). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) as a learning approach to improve 21st century skills: A review. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 16(7), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i07.14101
Fong, C. J., & Kremer, K. P. (2020). An Expectancy-Value Approach to Math Underachievement: Examining High School Achievement, College Attendance, and STEM Interest. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219890599
Glaze-Crampes, A. L. (2020). Leveraging communities of practice as professional learning communities in science, technology, engineering, math (STEM) education. Education Sciences, 10(8), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080190
Husna, E. F., Adlim, M., Gani, A., Syukri, M., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Developing STEM-Based Student Worksheet to Improve Students’ Creativity and Motivation of Learning Science. Scientiae Educatia, 9(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v9i1.6440
Jawad, L. F., Majeed, B. H., & Alrikabi, H. T. S. (2021). The Impact of Teaching by Using STEM Approach in The Development of Creative Thinking and Mathematical Achievement Among the Students of The Fourth Scientific Class. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(13), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i13.24185
Joklitschke, J., Rott, B., & Schindler, M. (2018). Theories About Mathematical Creati Vit Y in Contemporary Research : a Literature Review. Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3(July), 171–178.
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Abdul Hamid, S. R., Ridhuan Abdullah, M., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
Kong Suik. (2020). Pendekatan STEM dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran : Sorotan Literatur Bersistematik ( SLR ) ( STEM approaches in teaching and learning process : Systematic Literature Review ( SLR )). Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(2), 29–42.
Kotseva, I. (2019). Engineering Design-Based Learning in Integrative STEM Education. Dl.Uctm.Edu, 1. https://dl.uctm.edu/see/node/jsee2019-1/9_SEE_19-11_p_62-67.pdf
Kovari, A., & Rajcsanyi-Molnar, M. (2020). Mathability and creative problem solving in the MaTech math competition. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.2.2020.2.9
Lestari, T. P., & Sumarti, S. S. (2018). STEM-Based Project Based Learning Model to Increase Science Process and Creative Thinking Skills of 5th Grade. Journal of Primary Education, 7(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v7i1.21382
Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9
Lin, L., Lee, T., & Snyder, L. A. (2018). Math self-efficacy and STEM intentions: A person-centered approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(OCT), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02033
Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC 2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01231A
Marco-bujosa, L. (2021). Prospective Secondary Math Teachers Encountering STEM in a Methods Course : When Math is More Than “ Just Math ” To cite this article : Prospective Secondary Math Teachers Encountering STEM in a Methods Course : When Math is More Than “ Just Math .”
Mathiphatikul, T., Bongkotphet, T., & Dangudom, K. (2019). Learning management through engineering design process based on STEM education for developing creative thinking in equilibrium topic for 10th grade students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032015
Monica, Y., Rinaldi, A., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2021). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIS : DAMPAK MODEL OPEN ENDED DAN ADVERSITY QUOTIENT ( AQ ) Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung , Lampung , Indonesia Universitas Hasyim Asy ’ ari , Jombang , Indonesia Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup ,. 10(2), 550–562.
Nawang Sari, R., Tri Riya Anggraini, D., Komering Ulu, O., & PGRI Bandar Lampung, S. (2021). Pendekatan Steam Dalam Project Based Learning (PjBL) Mewujudkan Merdeka Belajar Untuk Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pengajaran Dan Riset, 01(02), 1.
Parno, Supriana, E., Yuliati, L., Widarti, A. N., Ali, M., & Azizah, U. (2019). The influence of STEM-based 7E learning cycle on students critical and creative thinking skills in physics. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 9), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1158.0982S919
Pratika S. (2018). Implementation of the Stem Learning To Improve the Creative Thinking Skills of High School Student in the Newton Law of Gravity Material. Journal of Komodo Science Education, 01(01), 106–116. http:ejournal.stkipsantupaulus.ac.id/index.php/jkse
Putra, A., & Roza, M. (2020). Systematic literatur review: Adversity quotient dan self-efficacy dalam pembelajaran matematika. At- Tarbawi, 12(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.32505/tarbawi.v12i2.2065
Rahmawati, L., & Juandi, D. (2022). Pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan stem: systematic literature review. 7(1), 149–160.
Remijan, K. W. (2016). Project-based learning and design-focused projects to motivate secondary mathematics students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1520
Saironi, M., & Sukestiyarno, Y. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa dan Pembentukan Karakter Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa pada Pembelajaran Open Ended Berbasis Etnomatematika. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Educatio Research, 6(1), 76–88. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Kiray, S. A. (2021). Computational thinking skills of gifted and talented students in integrated STEM activities based on the engineering design process: The case of robotics and 3D robot modeling. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42(August), 100931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100931
Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’ interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a
Siew, N. M. (2017). Integrating STEM in an Engineering Design Process: The Learning Experience. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 6(4), 128–141. http://library.uprm.edu:2404/ehost/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=2263ee5a-20f2-4b8c-af4e-6a8f58b789e9@sessionmgr101&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=118132072&db=a9h
Siew, N. M. (2022). Exploring Students’ Stem Imagination Process Through an Engineering Design Process. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 01, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17501/26827034.2021.1101
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2015). (Mari wes) Desain Tugas Untuk Mengidentifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Matematika. 1–15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242735927_Desain_Tugas_untuk_Mengidentifikasi_kemampuan_berpikir_Kreatif_Siswa_dalam_Matematika%0A
Soumitra, D., Bruno, L., Rivera León, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2021). Global Innovation Index 2021: Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis. In World Intellectual Property Organization (Issue 14th Edition). https://www.bloomberg.com/topics/global-innovation-index%0Ahttp://www.wipo.int/publications/ru/series/index.jsp?id=129
Sriraman, B. (2017). Mathematical creativity: psychology, progress and caveats. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(7), 971–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0886-0
Supandi, S., Suyitno, H., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Dwijanto, D. (2021). Learning barriers and student creativity in solving math problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042088
Tubb, A. L., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., Patston, T., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). The development of mathematical creativity across high school: Increasing, decreasing, or both? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(February), 100634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100634
Ummah, S. K., Inam, A., & Azmi, R. D. (2019). Creating manipulatives: Improving students’ creativity through project-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5093.93-102
Wang, M. Te, Ye, F., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(8), 1805–1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0618-8
Yousef Haik, T. S. (2011). Engineering Design Process. In Gastronomía ecuatoriana y turismo local. (Vol. 1, Issue 69).
Yustina, Syafii, W., & Vebrianto, R. (2020). The effects of blended learning and project-based learning on pre-service biology teachers’ creative thinking skills through online learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Maydilla Fadiarahma Vistara, Rochmad Rochmad, Kritina Wijayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal) agree to the following terms:
For all articles published in MEJ, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
