Advanced-Level Students’ Understanding of Exponential Equations: A Zimbabwean Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v7i2.25731Abstract
This paper reports on a study which explored high school students’ conceptual understanding of the techniques of exponential functions. Thirty-one advanced-level students participated in the study. The study used APOS (Action-Process-Object-Schema) theory, a constructivist theory framework, to investigate participants’ conceptual understanding of exponential functions. Activity sheets constructed with tasks based on exponential equations were administered to the participants. The written responses were used to identify participants’ mental constructions of these concepts. Furthermore, interviews were carried out to clarify participants’ written responses. The written responses and interview discussions pointed out that participants exhibited procedural tendencies in exponential functions. Most of the participants could not solve exponential equations, especially the radioactive‑decay functions. In addition, many participants did not have appropriate mental constructions at the process, object and schema levels, since most of them could not coordinate processes and encapsulate them into an object. This paper raises some important implications for mathematics education and further provides applications of genetic decomposition design and modification.
Downloads
References
Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Fuentes, S. R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer.
Asiala, M., Brown, A., De Vries, D. J., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and development in undergraduate mathematics education. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 2, 1-32. https://doi.org10.1090/cbmath/006/01
Birenbaum, M., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (1993). Applying an IRT-based cognitive diagnostic model to diagnose students’ knowledge states in multiplication and division with exponents. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(4), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0604_1
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9507-1
Chua, B. L. (2006). Secondary school students’ foundation in mathematics: The case of logarithms.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
De Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. (2008). Procedural embodiment and magic in linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 3-18.
Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-126). Springer Netherlands.
Dubinsky, E. D. (1997). Some thoughts on a first course in linear algebra at the college level. Purdue University.
Dubinsky, E., & Harel, G. (1992). The nature of the process conception of function. In G. Harel, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 85 106). Mathematical Association of America.
Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 275-282). Springer, Dordrecht.
Fauzi, M. R., & Priatna, N. (2019). Analysis of student’s mathematical connection and communication in algebra: The exponential equations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1), 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012065
Hewson, A. E. (2013). An examination of high school students' misconceptions about methods of exponential equations (Doctoral dissertation).
Hiebert, J. (2013). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Routledge.
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hunt, J. H., & Little, M. E. (2019). Intensifying interventions for students by identifying and remediating conceptual understanding in mathematics. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(6), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914534617
Jones, C. B. (2006). Reasoning about partial functions in the formal development of programs. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 145, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2005.10.002
Jupri, A., & Sispiyati, R. (2020). Students’ algebraic proficiency from the perspective of symbol sense. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1), 86-94.
Jupri, A., Sispiyati, R., & Chin, K. E. (2021). An investigation of students’ algebraic proficiency from a structure sense perspective. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 147-158. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1294492.pdf
Kazunga, C., & Bansilal, S. (2020). An APOS analysis of solving systems of equations using the inverse matrix method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103, 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09935-6
Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. (2006). Proposal and thesis writing: An introduction. Paulines Publishers.
Lancellotti, E. (2013). Fostering a deeper understanding of exponential relationships through problem solving. https://www.cas.udel.edu/dti-sub-site/Documents/curriculum/guide/2013/Thinking%20and%20Reasoning/units/13.02.05.pdf
Maat, S. M. B., & Zakaria, E. (2010). The learning environment, teacher’s factor and students attitude towards mathematics amongst engineering technology students. International Journal of Academic Research, 2(2), 16-20.
Machisi, E. (2012). Solving exponential equations: Learning from the students we teach. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 6(5), 1-6.
Makgakga, S., & Sepeng, P. (2013). Teaching and learning the mathematical exponential and logarithmic functions: A transformation approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(13), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n13p177
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
Mason, J. (2015). On being stuck on a mathematical problem: What does it mean to have something come-to-mind? LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.v3i1.1054
Msomi, A. M., & Bansilal, S. (2022). Analysis of students’ errors and misconceptions in solving linear ordinary differential equations using the method of Laplace transform. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(1), em0670. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11474
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
Noutsara, S., Neunjhem, T., & Chemrutsame, W. (2021). Mistakes in Mathematics Problems Solving Based on Newman's Error Analysis on Set Materials. Journal La Edusci, 2(1), 20-27. DOI: 10.37899/journallaedusci.v2i1.367
Perkins, D., & Blythe, T. (1994). Putting understanding up front. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 4 7.
Rushton, S. J. (2018). Teaching and learning mathematics through error analysis. Fields Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40928-018-0009-y
Sadler, A. J., & Thorning, D. W. S. (1987). Understanding pure mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Sawalha, Y. (2018). The effects of teaching exponential functions using authentic problem solving on students’ achievement and attitude [Doctoral dissertation]. Wayne State University.
Siyepu, S. W. (2013, June). Students’ interpretations in learning derivatives in a university mathematics classroom. In Z. Davis & S. Jaffer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa, 1, 183-193. AMESA, Cape Town.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.
South Africa. Department of Education. (2012). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement. Pretoria: Department of Education.
Tseng, D. (2012). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics education-in the case of law of exponents. Polygon, 1-23
Van de Walle, J. A. (2001). Geometric thinking and geometric concepts. In Elementary and middle scmool mathematics: Teaching developmentally (4th ed.; pp. 306-312). Allyn and Bacon.
Wahyuni, A., & Angraini, L. M. (2019). Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis pemecahan masalah pada mata kuliah aljabar linear [Development of learning material based on troubleshooting at aljabar linear lectures]. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v5i3.785
Weyer, R. S. (2010). APOS theory as a conceptualisation for understanding mathematics learning. Summation: Mathematics and Computer Science Scholarship at Ripon, 3, 9-15
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lillias Mutambara, Maria Tsakeni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal) agree to the following terms:
For all articles published in MEJ, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
