Misconceptions and Errors Among Grade 12 Students When Learning Differentiation Rules: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v8i2.33081Abstract
t is an established fact that some grade 12 students learning differentiation in calculus are found struggling with the rule of differentiation and these rules include power rule, quotient rule, chain rule and product rule. Because of these, some students came up with some misconceptions which eventually resulted to the students having multiple errors when learning rules of differentiation. The reason associated with these common errors are not far from their failure to model some prerequisite knowledge in the laws of logarithm into their learning of the laws of differentiation. And this has resulted to the poor performance of some students in mathematics (calculus) since calculus carries about 40% in the overall grade in mathematics as a subject at grade 12 level. On this note, this paper presents an analysis of students’ errors and misconceptions in learning differentiation rule. The study was conducted among grade 12 students preparing for NSC examination in a high school in Limpopo province in South Africa. And the data was initially collected using 35 test scripts of grade 12 on the topic of differentiation and differentiation rule. A qualitative approach was considered, and the data collected was analysed, focusing on product rules, quotient rules and chain rules and the errors committed. The result of the study indicated that some grade 12 students make some errors and misconceptions in differentiation rules. And these were because of poor conceptual understanding, poor mathematics language understanding, and some other error. It was confirmed that the results of this study highlight the common mistakes and errors students make when learning differentiation rules, and these errors are; conceptual, systemic, language, and generalization errors.
Downloads
References
Aliyeva, A. (2021). Differentiated instruction, perceptions, and practices. Inclusive Education in a Post-Soviet Context: A Case of Kazakhstan, 67-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65543-3
Anton, H., Bivens, I., & Davis, S. (2012). Calculus: Early Transcendentals (10th ed.). John
Wiley & Sons.
Bakri, SRA., Ying, LC., Khium,CC., Hua, TM. (2021) .Bridging the gap between the derivative and graph sketching in calculus. Asian Journal of University Education. 16(4),121-136. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11962
Barker, B., Cooley, L & Trigueros, M. (2000). A calculus graphing schema. Journal for research in mathematics education, 31(5), 557-578. https://www.jstor.org/stable/749887
Chikwanha, P., Mudavanhu, Y., & Chagwiza, C. J. (2022). Exploring Errors and
Misconceptions in Differentiation: A Case Study of Advanced Level Students in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Social Science Research, 10(2), 40-58. doi:10.5296/ijssr.v10i2.19811
Chigede, C. (2016). Exploring misconceptions in Differentiation by Advanced level students: a case of a High School in Wedza District (Zimbabwe, Doctoral dissertation).
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Mixed methods research. In Research methods in education (pp. 31-50). Routledge.
Cooley, L., Trigueros M, Barker, B. (2007). Schema thematization : a framework and an example. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 38(4), 370-392. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034879
Cline, K., Zullo, H., & Huckaby, D. A. (2020). Addressing common errors and misconceptions in integral calculus with clickers and classroom voting. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 39(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrz002
Dlamini, RB., Brijlall, D., Jojo, Z. (2017). Exploring possible causes of poor performance by high school students in differential calculus. International Journal of Sciences and Research. DOI: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.8.54
Green, M., Piel, J., & Flowers, C. (2008). Reversing Education Majors’ Arithmetic Misconceptions with Short-Term Instruction Using Manipulatives. North Carolina at Charlotte: Heldref Publications. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.4.234-242
Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Graham, K. (1994). Research in calculus learning: Understanding of limits, derivatives, and integrals. In J. Kaput &E. Dubinsky (Eds.) Research Issues in Undergraduate Mathematics Learning, (31-45). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_26
Herheim, R. (2023). On the origin, characteristics, and usefulness of instrumental and relational understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(3), 389-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10225-0
Jameson, G., Machaba, M. F., & Matabane, M. E. (2023). An Exploration of Grade 12 Learners’Misconceptions on Solving Calculus Problem: A Case of Limits. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(4), 94-124.
Jameson, G. Machaba, M.F. & Fasinu, V.G. (2024). Grade 12 Students’ Misconceptions when Modelling their Calculus Ideas into their Learning of an Optimization: A Real-Life Problem. An unpublished paper
Kandeel, R. A. A. (2021). Learners' Mathematics Proficiency Levels on PISA 2018: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14323a
Larson, R., & Edwards, B. (2013). Calculus (10th ed.). Cengage Learning
Makonye, J. P., & Luneta, K. (2014). Mathematical errors in differential calculus tasks in the Senior School Certificate Examinations in South Africa. Education as Change, 18(1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2013.847014
Mkhatshwa, T. (2016). Business Calculus Students’ Reasoning about Optimization Problems: A case study of Quantitative Reasoning in an Economic Context. Syracuse University, SURFACE https://www.proquest.com/docview/1823607164?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Oktaç, A., Trigueros, M., & Romo, A. (2019). APOS Theory. For the learning of mathematics, 39(1), 33-37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26742010
Orton, A. (1983). Students understanding of differentiation. Educational studies in mathematics, 14, 165-177. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00410540.pdf
Othman, Z. S. B., Khalid, A. K. B., & Mahat, A. B. (2018, June). Students’ common mistakes in basic differentiation topics. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1974, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041709
Porter, M.K., & Masingila, J.O. (2000). Students learning calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics 42, 165–177. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1004166811047.pdf
Stewart, J. (2015). Calculus: Early Transcendentals (8th ed.). Cengage Learning
Strang, G. (2020). Calculus v1. OpenStax.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). Differentiated instruction. In Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 279-292). Routledge.
Tall, & Watson, 2013 Tall, D. & Watson, A.(2013) Schemas and processes for sketching the gradient of a graph. Mathematics Education Research Centre. University of Warwick,Uk. https://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/pdfs/dot2001q-Watson-Tall.pdf
Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Frèrejean, J., Dolmans, D., van Merriënboer, J., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction. School effectiveness and school improvement, 30(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539013
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jameson G., Machaba, Vojo G. Fasinu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal) agree to the following terms:
For all articles published in MEJ, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
