Adaptasi alat ukur prosocial tendencies measure (PTM) versi bahasa Indonesia pada anak usia sekolah di Bandung

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v9i1.12704

Keywords:

Prosocial behavior, validation, prosocial tendencies measure

Abstract

Objektif: Perilaku prososial penting untuk diukur pada anak usia sekolah karena sangat rentan untuk munculnya perilaku bermasalah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengadaptasi alat ukur PTM versi bahasa Indonesia dengan psychometric property yang baik.

Metode: Metode penelitian kuantitatif dilakukan dalam 2 tahap yaitu studi translasi dan validasi. 373 partisipan berusia 9-12 tahun (M = 10.31) dipilih melalui cluster sampling untuk mengisi kuesioner untuk mengukur validitas dan reliabilitas melalui internal consistency.

Temuan: Hasil perhitungan internal consistency alat ukur PTM menunjukkan α = 0.881 dan hasil uji validitas dengan menggunakan CFA menunjukkan model good fit (RMSEA = 0.045, CFI = 0.94). Hasil uji reliabilitas di setiap dimensi yaitu altruism (α = 0.623), compliant (α = 0.496), emotional (α = 0.582), public (α = 0.482), dan dire (α = 0.361). Hanya dimensi anonymous yang sudah reliable (α = 0.729).

Kesimpulan: Alat ukur PTM versi bahasa Indonesia valid dan reliable. Meskipun begitu, sebagian besar dimensi masih memiliki reliabilitas yang rendah.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nabhilla Armadhita, Universitas Padjadjaran

Magister Psikologi Profesi

Majoring Psikologi Klinis Anak dan Remaja

Universitas Padjadjaran

Afra Hafny Noer, Universitas Padjadjaran

Departemen Psikologi Perkembangan

Fakultas Psikologi

Universitas Padjadjaran

Esti Wungu, Universitas Padjadjaran

Departemen Psikologi Perkembangan

Fakultas Psikologi

Universitas Padjadjaran

References

Azimpour, A., Neasi, A., Shehni-Yailagh, M., & Arshadi, N. (2012). Validation of “prosocial tendencies measure" in Iranian university students. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 2(2), 34–42.


Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. Doi:10.1023/A:1014033032440


Department of Health and Ageing. (2002). Mental health national outcomes and casemix collection: overview of clinician-rated and consumer self-report measures strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Mental Health & Suicide Prevention Branch, 1(50), 1–25. http://www.sdqinfo.com.


Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th Ed). Prentice-Hall.

Eisenberg-Berg, N., Cameron, E., Tryon, K., & Dodez, R. (1981). Socialization of prosocial behavior in the preschool classroom. Developmental Psychology, 17(6), 773–782. Doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.6.773

Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., & Spinrad, T. (2006). Prosocial development. Handbook of Child Psychology, 646–702.


Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M. Lerner, Richard (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (7th ed., pp. 1–47). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of prosocial behavior. Academic Press, Inc.


Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press.


Eisenberg, N., Sallquist, J., French, D. C., Purwono, U., Suryanti, T. A., & Pidada, S. (2009). The relations of majority – minority group status and having an other-religion friend to Indonesian youths’ socioemotional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 248–259. Doi:10.1037/a0014028


Flouri, E., & Sarmadi, Z. (2016). Prosocial behavior and childhood trajectories of internalizing and externalizing problems: The role of neighborhood and school contexts. Developmental Psychology, 52(2), 253–258. Doi:10.1037/dev0000076


Friedenberg, L. (1995). Psychological testing: design, analysis, and use. Allyn & Bacon.

Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., Grime, R. L., & Snarey, J. R. (2007). Moral judgement development across culture: Revisiting Kohlberg’s universality claims. Developmental Review, 27, 443–500.


Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345. Doi:10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015


Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Andersen, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (MVDA) (Seventh Ed). Pearson New International Edition. Doi:10.1002/9781118895238.ch8


Hamonangan, J., & Ariyanto, A. A. (2014). Pengaruh eksklusi sosial terhadap kecenderungan prososial: Studi perbandingan antargender. Universitas Indonesia.


Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. Doi:10.1080/10705519909540118


Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (6th Ed). Thomson Wadsworth Cengage Learning.


Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2016). KBBI daring. Badan Pengembangan & Pembinaan Bahasa. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/Beranda


Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Tesaurus tematis bahasa Indonesia. Badan Pengembangan & Pembinaan Bahasa. http://tesaurus.kemdikbud.go.id/tematis/

Mestre, M. V., Carlo, G., Samper, P., Tur-Porcar, A. M., & Mestre, A. L. (2015). Psychometric evidence of a multidimensional measure of prosocial behaviors for Spanish adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 176(4), 260–271. Doi:10.1080/00221325.2015.1052726


Nantel-Vivier, A., Pihl, R. O., Côté, S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2014). Developmental association of prosocial behaviour with aggression, anxiety and depression from infancy to preadolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 55(10), 1135–1144. Doi:10.1111/jcpp.12235


Pastorelli, C., Lansford, J. E., Paula, B., Kanacri, L., Patrick, S., Giunta, L. Di, Bacchini, D., Bombi, A. S., Zelli, A., Miranda, C., Bornstein, M. H., Tapanya, S., Maria, L., Tirado, U., Alampay, L. P., Al-hassan, S. M., Chang, L., & Deater-deckard, K. (2016). Positive parenting and children’s prosocial behavior in eight countries. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(7), 824–834. Doi:10.1111/jcpp.12477


Rayesa, T. F., & Nu’man, T. M. (2015). Peranan disipilin induktif orangtua terhadap perilaku prososial yang dimediasi oleh empati. Universitas Islam Indonesia.


Richaud, M. C., Mesurado, B., & Cortada, A. K. (2012). Analysis of dimensions of prosocial behavior in an Argentinean sample of children. Psychological Reports: Mental & Physical Health, 111(3), 687–696. Doi:10.2466/10.11.17.PR0.111.6.687-696

Rodrigues, J., Ulrich, N., Mussel, P., Carlo, G., & Hewig, J. (2017). Measuring prosocial tendencies in Germany: Sources of validity and reliablity of the revised prosocial tendency measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(DEC), 1–17. Doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02119


Šukys, S., & Šukienė, E. (2015). Validity and reliability of the Lithuanian version of prosocial tendencies measure-revised (PTMR). Baltic Journal of Sport & Health Sciences, 98(3), 43–49.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-15

How to Cite

Armadhita, N., Noer, A. H., & Wungu, E. (2021). Adaptasi alat ukur prosocial tendencies measure (PTM) versi bahasa Indonesia pada anak usia sekolah di Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 9(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v9i1.12704

Issue

Section

Articles