Pengaruh atribut usia dan jenis kelamin dosen terhadap pemberian evaluasi oleh mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v9i2.15911Keywords:
gender, halo effect, individual attributes, lecturer age, student evaluationAbstract
The practice of giving evaluations from students to lecturers is often the moment when the halo effect occurs. Sex and age as individual attributes contribute to positive or negative evaluations of teaching evaluations. The purpose of this study is whether the attributes of age and sex interact with the halo effect in giving evaluations from students to lecturers. This research uses a one-shot case study with an online between-subjects design. One hundred twenty participants were divided into four groups. Each group evaluates 1 of 4 different photos (young men, older men, young women, and older women) labeled with the identity as a lecturer. The results of multiple linear regression analysis show: (1) The sex of the lecturer has no effect on student evaluation (F=0.730, p=0.395); (2) Lecturer age has no effect on student evaluation (F=0.587, p=0.445); (3) The interaction of sex and age has no effect on student evaluation (F=0.649, p=0.525). The sex and age of the lecturer do not affect the evaluation by students. The halo effect did not occur in the students in this study.
Downloads
References
Abel, M.H., & Meltzer, A. L.(2007). Student rating of a male and female professors’ lecture on sex discrimination in the workforce. Sex Roles, 57, 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199007-9245-x
Alvarez-Garc ´ ´ıa, D., Garc´ıa, T., & Gonzalez-Castro, P. (2014). ´Halo effect of student misbehavior on teacher ratings of impulsivity and other executive function deficits. In M. C.Olmstead (Ed.), Psychology of emotions, motivations, and actions. Psychology of impulsivity: New research (p. 21–31). Nova Science Publishers.
Anderson, K.J. (2010). Students’ stereotypes of professors: An exploration of the double violations of ethnicity and gender. Social Psychology of Education, 13(4), 459–472. https://doi.org.ezproxy.ugm.ac.id/10.1007/s11218-010-9121-3
Arbuckle, J., & Williams, B. D. (2003). Students’ perceptions of expressiveness: Age and gender effects on teacher evaluations. Sex Roles, 49(9/10), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025832707002
Basow, S. A. (2000). Best and worst professors: Gender patterns in students’ choices. Sex Roles, 43 (5/6), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026655528055
Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.170
Darlington, R. B., & Hayes, A. F. (2017). Regression Analysis and Linear Models. The Guildford Press Djojopranoto, R. R., & Mahadwartha, P. A. (2016). Pengujian bias perilaku: Gambler’s fallacy, halo effect, dan familiarity effect di pasar modal Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(2), 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2016.08
Forgas, J. P., & Laham, S. M. (2017). Halo effects. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgment and memory (p. 276–290). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Graf, M., & Unkelbach, C. (2016). Halo effects in trait ¨ assessment depend on information valence: Why being honest makes you industrious, but lying does not make you lazy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42 (3), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215627137
Goebel, B. L., & Cashen, V. M. (1979). Age, sex, and attractiveness as factors in student ratings of teachers: A developmental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71 (5), 646-653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.5.646
Johnson, K.L., Lick, D.J., & Carpinella, L.M. (2015) Emergent research in social vision: an integrated approach to the determinants and consequences of social categorization. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12147
Joye, S.W., & Wilson, J.H. (2015). Professor age and gender affect student perceptions and grades. Journal Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(4), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i4.13466
Keeley, J. W., English, T., Irons, J., & Henslee, A. M. (2013). Investigating halo and ceiling effects in student evaluations of instruction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412475300
Kramadibrata, A. (2015). The Halo surrounding native English speaker teachers in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1352
MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
Malouff, J. M., Stein, S. J., Bothma, L. N., Coulter, K., & Emmerton, A. J. (2014). Preventing Halo bias in grading the work of university students. Cogent Psychology, 1(1), 988937. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2014.988937
Marucci, E., Oldenburg, B., Barrera, D., Cillessen, A. H. N., Hendrickx, M., & Veenstra, R. (2021). Halo and association effects: Cognitive biases in teacher attunement to peer-nominated bullies, victims, and prosocial students. Social Development, 30(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12455
Murray, D., Boothby, C., Zhao, H., Minik, V., Berub ´ e, N., ´ Lariviere, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2020). Exploring the `personal and professional factors associated with student evaluations of tenure-track faculty. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0233515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233515
Ozcan, K. (2013). Student evaluation of lecture and teaching ¨ effectiveness in higher education. Academic Journals, 8(8), pp. 378-389, 12. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1154
Pennington, C.G., Matthew D. C., Stefanie A. W. (2020). Influence of a physical education teacher’s perceived age on high school pupils’ perceptions of effectiveness and learning. European Physical Education Review. 26 (1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X18816342
Pohl, R. (Ed.). (2017). Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in judgment, thinking and memory (Second edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2009). Unraveling bias from student evaluations of their high school science teachers. Science Education, 93(5), 827–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20332
Ryan, R., & Wilson, J. H. (2014). Professor-student rapport scale: Psychometric properties of the brief version. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(3), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v14i3.5162
Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Sadler, P. M. (2018). Evaluating the quality of middle school Mathematics teachers, ssing videos rated by college students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.006
Spooren, P. (2010). On the credibility of the judge: A cross-classified multilevel analysis on students’ evaluation of teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(4), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.02.001
Stonebraker, R. J., & Stone, G. S. (2015). Too old to teach? The effect of age on college and university professors. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9374-y
Sugiono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sulhaini, S., Rinuastuti, B. H., & Sakti, D. P. B. (2019). The halo effect of foreign brands on the misclassification of local brands, management & marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 14(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0025
Sutarman, S. & Simbolon, M. (2015). Aplikasi evaluasi kinerja dosen di stmik bina sarana global. Jurnal Sisfotek Global, 5 (1), 78-80. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.38101/sisfotek.v5i1.70
Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663
Wilson, J. H., Beyer, D., & Monteiro, H. (2014). Professor age affects student ratings: Halo effect for younger teachers. College Teaching, 62(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2013.825574
Wilson, J. H., & Ryan, R. G. (2013). Professor–student rapport scale: Six items predict student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 40(2), 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0098628312475033
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
