Adaptasi alat ukur kesuksesan karier subjektif

Authors

  • Tri Muji Ingarianti Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Fendy Suhariadi Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Airlangga
  • Fajrianthi Fajrianthi Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v10i1.19002

Keywords:

Adaptation, subjective career success, SCSI, measurement

Abstract

Subjective career success is an attitude regarding an individual’s achievement and satisfaction with their career resulting from a personal evaluation of their career experience. Subjective career success has eight dimensions: recognition, quality work, meaningful work, influence, authenticity, personal life, growth and development, and satisfaction. Subjective Career Success Inventory – SCSI (Subjective Career Success Questionnaire) has 24 items. The use of instruments at different cultural backgrounds requires an adaptation process so that the measurement results are valid and reliable, but until now, there has been no research on the adaptation of subjective career success measurement tools in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to obtain a standardized subjective career success measurement tool. The adaptation process was carried out using the International Test Commission reference in2016. Based on the results of the CFA analysis of the LISREL 8.8 program, it can be concluded that according to theory, subjective career success models have a good fit model. This means that the zero hypotheses that state the subjective career success model of the goodness of fit are acceptable. This explains that the resulting model can describe actual conditions and can be used to measure subjective career success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abele, A. E., & Spurk, D. (2009). The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.005

Akbulut, A. Y. (2016). Majoring in information systems: An examination of role model influence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(5), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.002

Akkermans, J. & Kubasch, S. (2017). Trending topics in careers: A review and future research agenda. Career Development International, 22(6), 586–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2017-0143.

Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & Carlier, O. (2008). Career success: Constructing a multidimensional model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.05.005

Dries, N., Pepermans, R., Hofmans, J., & Rypens, L. (2009). Development and validation of an objective intra-organizational career success measure for managers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.564

Ferdinand, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen(5th ed.). Semarang: Seri Pustaka

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Ghozali, I. (2017). Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep Dan Aplikasi Dengan Program AMOS 24. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/256352

Gunz, H. P., & Heslin, P. A. (2005). Reconceptualizing career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 105– 111. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.300

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

Heslin, P. A. (2003). Self- and other-referent criteria of career success. Journal of Career Assessment, 11(3), 262–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703254500

Hofmans, J., Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2008). The career satisfaction scale: Response bias among men and women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.08.001

Huang, C.C., Wang, Y.M., Tsin-Wei Wu, T.W., & Wang, P.A. (2013). An empirical analysis of the antecedents and performance consequences of using the moodle platform. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(2), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.267

Ingarianti, T.M., Suhariadi, F., & Fajrianthi F. (2021). Exploring subjective career success. Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 530, 190-194. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210423.027

International Test Commission. (2016). The ITC guidelines for the translating and adapting Tests} (2nd ed.). www.InTestCom.org

Judge, T.A., Cable, D.M., Boudreau, J.W., & Bretz Jr., R.D.B. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48, 485-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01767.x

Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x

Ng, T. & Feldman, D. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63, 677-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x

Pan, J., & Zhou, W. (2015). How do employees construe their career success: An improved measure of subjective career success. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12094

Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. & Owen, S.V. (2007) Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199

Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164704

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., Holtom, B. C., & Pierotti, A. J. (2013). Even the best-laid plans sometimes go askew: Career self-management processes, career shocks, and the decision to pursue graduate education. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98}(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030882

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069452

Shockley, K. M., Ureksoy, H., Rodopman, O. B., Poteat, L. F., & Dullaghan, T. R. (2016). Development of a new scale to measure subjective career success: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 128-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2046

Sperber, A. D. (2004). Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology, 126, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016

Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., & Dries, N. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of objective versus subjective career success: Competing perspectives and future directions. Journal Management, 45(1), 35–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318786563

Turban, D. B., & Dougherty, T. W. (1994). Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 688–702. https://doi.org/10.2307/256706

Zhou, W., Sun, J., Guan, Y., Li, Y., & Pan, J. (2013). Criteria of career success among Chinese employees: Developing a multidimensional scale with qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712471302

Downloads

Published

2022-02-04

How to Cite

Ingarianti, T. M., Suhariadi, F. ., & Fajrianthi, F. (2022). Adaptasi alat ukur kesuksesan karier subjektif. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 10(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v10i1.19002

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): January

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.