Pengaruh tekanan teman sebaya dan kecemasan menghadapi ujian terhadap ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v8i1.9127Keywords:
Peer pressure, academic dishonesty, test anxietyAbstract
Abstrak. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan pengaruh tekanan teman sebaya terhadap ketidakjujuran akademik yang dimoderasi kecemasan menghadapi ujian. Subjek penelitian ini berjumlah 255 mahasiswa yang diambil dengan teknik incidental sampling dari 3 perguruan tinggi di Malang. Instrumen penelitian adalah peer pressure scale, academic dishonesty scale, dan test anxiety inventory. Teknik analisis data adalah moderated multiple regression. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tekanan teman sebaya memberikan pengaruh signifikan terhadap ketidakjujuran akademik. Sementara itu kecemasan menghadapi ujian tidak memoderasi pengaruh tekanan teman sebaya terhadap ketidakjujuran akademik.
Kata Kunci: Tekanan teman sebaya, ketidakjujuran akademik, kecemasan menghadapi ujian
Abstract. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of peer pressure on academic dishonesty is moderated by test anxiety. Subject in this study amounted 255 student in Malang are scattered in three high school that are using incidental sampling technique. The instrument of this study using peer pressure scale, academic dishonesty scale, and test anxiety inventory. The result of this study indicated if there is significant effect of peer pressure to academic dishonesty. While the test anxiety doesn’t moderate the effect of peer pressure on academic.
Keywords: Peer pressure, academic dishonesty, test anxiety
Downloads
References
Al-Hilali, S. I. (2005). Syarah Riyadhush Shalihin. Jakarta: Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi'i.
Awan, R. U., Azher, M., Anwar, M. N., & Naz, A. (2010). An investigation of foreign language classroom anxiety and its relationship with students' achievement. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7(11), 33-40.
Barzegar, K., & Khezri, H. (2012). Predicting academic cheating among the fifth grade students: The role of self-efficacy and academic self-handicapping. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 2(1), 1-6.
Bernberg, R. E. (1995). A Measure of Social Conformity. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 39(1), 89-96.
Blachnio, A., & Weremko, M. (2011). Academic cheating is contagious: The influence of the presence of others on honesty. A study report. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(1), 14-19.
Bolin, A. U. (2004). Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Psychology, 138(2), 101-114.
Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 19-44.
Brunnell, A. B., Staats, S., Barden, J., & Hupp, J. M. (2011). Narcissism and academic dishonesty: The exhibitionism dimension and the lack of guilt. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 323-328.
Carrel, S. E., Malmstrom, F. V., & West, J. E. (2008). Peer effects in academic cheating. The Journal of Human Resources, 173-207.
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270-295.
Catania, A. C., & Harnad, S. (1988). The Selection of Behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and sequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clasen, D. R., & Brown, B. B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peer pressure in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 451-468.
Clasen, D. R., & Brown, B. B. (1987). Understanding peer pressure in middle school. Middle School Research Selected Studies, 12(1), 65-75.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., & Reisenwitz, T. H. (2008). The impact of unetchical reasoning on different types of academic dishonesty: An explonatory Study. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 5(12), 793-797.
Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2016). A comparisob of Chinese and Australian university students' attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 231-246.
Farnese, M. L., Tramontano, C., Fida, R., & Paciello, M. (2011). Cheating behavior in academic context: Does academic moral disengagement matter? Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 356-365.
Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational, 97(3), 115-122.
Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & DeMaris, A. (1993). The family and peer relations of black adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Familt, 55, 277-287.
Griffin, A. M., Cleveland, H. H., Schlomer, G. L., Vandenbergh, D. J., & Feinberg, M. E. (2014). Differential susceptibility: The genetic moderation of peer pressure on alcohol use. Journal Youth Adolescence, 44, 1841-1853.
Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., & Passow, H. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unetgical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 311-324.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford.
Hosny, M., & Fatima, S. (2014). Attitude of students towards cheating and plagiarism: University case study. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(8), 748-757.
Hughes, J. M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Understanding academic misconduct. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(1), 49-63.
Iglesia, G. d., Stover, J. B., & Liporace, M. F. (2014). Perceived social support and academic achievement in Argentinean college students. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 10(4), 637-649.
Indah, P. S., & Shofiah, V. (2012). Hubungan prokrastinasi akademik dengan ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa psikologi UIN Suska Riau. Jurnal Psikologi, 8(1), 29-36.
Iranfar, S., Khosnoudi, R., Rezaei, M., Ahmadi, S., Rashiditabar, A., & Kashani, M. (2013). The relationship between test anxiety and academic performance pf students in vital statistics coure. Educational Research in Medical Sciences, 2(2), 35-38.
Ismail, S., & Omar, Z. (2017). Academic dishonesty: An empirical study of personal beliefs and values of undergraduate students in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal Social Sciences & Humanities, 25(3), 1181-1198.
Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It's wrong but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209-228.
Johal, D. S., & Mehta, R. (2015). Behavioral problems in relation to peer pressure among adolescents. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 6(2), 156-160.
Jurdi, R., Hage, H. S., & Chow, H. H. (2011). Academic dishonesty in the Canadian classroom: Behaviours of a sample university students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41(3), 1-35.
Karakos, H. (2014). Positive peer support or negative peer influence? The role of peers among adolescents in recovery high school. Peabody Journal Education, 89(2), 214-228.
Khodaie, E., Moghadamzadeh, A., & Salehi, K. (2011). Factors affecting the probability of academic cheating school students in Tehran. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1587-1595.
Leary, M. L. (2010). Affiliation, Acceptance and Belonging. In S. T. Fiske, D T Gilbert, & G Lindzey, Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 864-897). New York: Wiley.
Malinowski, C. (2015). The relationship between undergraduate student attitudes about hypothetical marketing moral dilemmas and two personality traits: Test anxiety and need for social approval. CF, 13(2), 383-389.
Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study if dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1-10.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
Montero, I., & Leon, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862.
Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. B. (2006). Motivational perpectives on student cheating: Toward an integrater model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129-145.
Ng, H. W., Davies, G., Bates, I., & Avellone, M. (2003). Academic dishonesty among pharmacy students. Pharmacy Education, 3(4), 261-269.
Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A Multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69-77.
Nora, W. L., & Zhang, K. C. (2010). Motives of cheating among secondary students: The role of self-efficacy and peer influence. Asia Pacific Education Rev, 11, 573-584.
Orfus, S. (2008). The effect test anxiety and time pressure on performance. The Huron University College Journal of Learning and Motivation, 46(1), 118-133.
Oz, A. O., Lane, J. F., & Michou, A. (2015). Autonomus and controlling reasons underlying achievement goals during task engagement: Their relation to intrinsic motivation and cheating. Educational Psychology, 1-13, DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2015.1109064 .
Pascual-Ezama, D., Dunfield, D., de Liano,, B. G., & Prelec, D. (2015). Peer effect in unethical behavior: Standing or reputation? Plos One, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122305, 1-14.
Rana, R. A., & Mahmood, N. (2010). The relationship between test anxiety and academic achievement. Bulletin of Education and Research, 32(2), 63-74.
Rawwas, M. Y., Al-Khatib, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (2004). Academic dishonesty: A cross cultural comparison of US and Chinese marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 89-99.
Sarita, & Dahiya, R. (2015). Academic cheating among students: Pressure of parents and teachers. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(10), 793-797.
Sideeg, A. (2015). Test anxiety, self-esteem, gender difference, and academic achievement: The case of the students of medical sciences at Sudanese universities: (A mixed methods approach). British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 19(2), 39-59.
Sims, R. L. (2015). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 207-211.
Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope Theory. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez, Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 257-276). New York: Oxford University Press.
Stoeber, J. (2004). Dimensions of test anxiety: Relations to ways of coping with pre exam anxiety and uncertainty. Anxiety, stress & Coping. An International Journal, 17(3), 213-226.
Tarmizi, E. (2016). Harta Haram Muamalat Kontemporer. Bogor: Berkat Mulia Insani.
Taylor, J., & Deane, F. P. (2002). Development of a short form of the test anxiety inventory (TAI). The Journal of General Psychology, 129(2), 127-136.
Trifoni, A., & Shahini, M. (2011). How does exam anxiety affect the performance of university students? Mediterranian Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 93-100.
Urhahne, D., Chao, S. H., Florineth, M. L., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2011). Academic self-concept, learning motivation, and test anxiety of the underestimated student. British Journal of Educational Psychologu, 81, 161-177.
Yadav, S., Rawal, G., & Baxi, M. (2016). Plagiarism - A serious scientific misconduct. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 6(2), 344-366.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
