The effect of think-pair-share-write based on hybrid learning on metacognitive skills, creative thinking and cognitive learning at SMA negeri 3 Malang

Authors

  • Ika Yulianti Siregar Ganesha Operation of Samarinda
  • Herawati Susilo Pendidikan Biologi Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Hadi Suwono Pendidikan Biologi Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v3i2.4217

Keywords:

creative thinking, cognitive learning outcomes, hybrid learning, metacognitive, think-pair-share-write

Abstract

The results of biology learning observation show that there are many constraints during the learning process in the class and consultation meeting between teacher and students. The think-pair-share-write based on hybrid learning was conducted to analyze the effect on metacognitive skills, creative thinking and learning outcomes. The research design was quasi experiment with pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The independent variable is think-pair-share-write based on Hybrid learning model, while the dependent variables are metacognitive skills, creative thinking, and cognitive learning outcomes. Metacognitive skills are measured by using metacognitive rubrics. Creative thinking skills and cognitive learning outcomes are measured by using a description test. The data were taken by conducting pretest and posttest. The hypothesis test used was anakova with level of significance 0,05 (P <0,05), as the test result was significant then the test was continued to LSD. Before the anakova test, normality and homogeneity test were performed. The results showed that think-pair-share-write based on Hybrid Learning significantly affecting: 1) the metacognitive skills with F arithmetic of 183,472 and Sig. 0,000; 2) the creative thinking skill with F value of 325,111 and Sig. 0,000; 3) the cognitive learning outcomes with F arithmetic of 175.068 and Sig. 0,000.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arends, R. I. (2008). Learning to teach. Terjemahan: Helly Prajitno Soetjipto. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach, Ninth Edition. New York: MacGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Badan Standar Nasional. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Beaumont, R. (2009). Research method and experimental design. Retrieved from http://www.robinbeaumont.co.uk/virtualclassroom/contents.htm

Corebima, A. D. (2006). Pengertian metakognisi. Makalah disampaikan pada Pelatihan Strategi Metakognitif pada Pembelajaran Biologi untuk Guru-guru Biologi SMA di Kota Palangkaraya.

Degeng, N. S. (1989). Ilmu pengajaran: Taksonomi variable. Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi, PPLPTK.

Eggen, P. D. & Kauhack, D. P. (1996). Strategies for teachers: Teaching content and thingking skills. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Gardner, A. (2006). Beyond the lab report: why we must encourage more writing in biology. Biology Teacher, 68(6), 325-329.

Haerullah, A. H. (2012). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran pemberdayaan berpikir melalui pertanyaan (PBMP) dan think pair share (TPS) serta pengaruh penerapannya terhadap metakognisi, berpikir kritis, dan sikap sosial siswa SD multietnis di Kota Ternate. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Howard, J. B. (2004). Metacognitif inquiry. School of Education Elon University. Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/ fileadmin/resources/ann_rev/rall_v5_ch7_supp.pdf.

Isna, F. (2010). Penerapan model pembelajaran cooperative script untuk meningkatkan keterampilan metakognitif dan berpikir siswa kelas XI IPA 4 SMA Negeri 1 Malang. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang

Jamaluddin. (2009). Pengaruh pembelajaran berpikir melalui pertanyaan dipadukan strategi kooperatif dan kemampuan akademik terhadap keterampilan metakognitif, berpikir kreatif, pemahaman konsep IPA Biologi, dan retensi siswa SD di Mataram. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Lee, M. & Baylor, A. L. (2006). Designing metacognitive maps for web-based learning. Educational Technology & Society. 9(1), 344 – 348.

Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. Retrieved from http://www. gse.bufallo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564 /metacog.htm.

Munandar, S. C. U. (1999). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Pierce, W. (2004). Metacognition: Study strategies, monitoring, and motivation. Makalah disampaikan pada workshop “A greatly expanded text version” di Prince George’s Community College. Retrieved from http://nsdl.org/resource/2200/20110312195943843T.

Siswati, B. H. (2012). pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif numbered heads together terhadap keterampilan metakognitif dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Ngoro Mojokerto. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang

Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning: Teori, riset dan praktik. Terjemahan: Nurulita. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Susmono. (2013). Eksperimentasi model pembelajaran think-talk-write (TTW) dan think-pair-share (TPS) pada pokok bahasan dimensi tiga ditinjau dari kesulitan belajar siswa kelas X SMA Negeri Di Kabupaten Magetan Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Solo: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-16

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): JULY

Section

ICT, Learning Media, and Learning Resources

License

Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.