The ability of quantitative literacy of pre-service biology students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v3i3.4874

Keywords:

pre-service biology students, plant anatomy, quantitative indicators, quantitative literacy

Abstract

This research have purpose to know and describe quantitative literacy of pre-service biology students based on six indicators of quantitative literacy. Methods used is descriptive with study survey. This research carried out at Siliwangi University with the subject as many as 30 pre-service biology students who take plant anatomy course. Based on the analysis of test and interview obtained that of 30 students, 4 students (13.3%) in high category, 10 students (33.3%) in medium category, and 16 students (53.3%) in low category. Overall, indicator of interpretation have succeeded owned by students, but other five indicators have not been owned. Lack of quantitative literacy of pre-service biology students is caused by course characteristics that tends to qualitative teaching materials that is not based on quantitative literacy, and inadequate facility to gain and analyzed quantitative data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ryan Ardiansyah, Siliwangi University

biology education department

References

AAC&U. (2011). Quantitative literacy value rubric. Hawaii: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiJktaYqbTXAhUBlpQKHa5bBXAQFgg6MAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassessment.dasa.ncsu.edu%2Fwpcontent%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F53%2F2015%2F09%2FQL-FinalRubric.pdf&usg=AOvVaw 1MPBGIdpWDA1MUOXO_rfCI.

Ardiansyah, R. (2014). Bahan ajar anatomi tumbuhan untuk menunjang literasi kuantitatif mahasiswa biologi. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences Forum 2014, 411–416. Retrieved from http://prosiding.upgri smg.ac.id

Best, J. (2008). Beyond calculation: Quantitative literacy and critical thinking about public issues. (B. L. Madison & L. A. Steen, Eds.), The Mathematical Association of America (incorporated). United States of America: Mathematical Association of America. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5038/1936-4660.2.2.6

Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The berlin numeracy test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 25–47. Retrieved from http://journal.sjdm.org/11/ 11808/jdm11808.html

Hubert, D. a, & Lewis, K. J. (2014). A framework for general education assessment: assessing information literacy and quantitative literacy with eportfolios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 4(1), 61–71. Retrieved from https://www. google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjFnfT8orTXAhULO7wKHQDUAa8QFggpMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theijep.com%2Fpdf%2FIJEP130.pdf&usg=AOvVaw07K4Enc0XtOat2P31ruJ4I

Lusardi, A., & Wallace, D. (2013). Financial literacy and quantitative reasoning in the high school and college classroom. Scholar Commons University of South Florida, 6(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.6.2.1

McCright, A. M. (2012). Enhancing students’ scientific and quantitative literacies through an inquiry-based learning project on climate change. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(4), 86–101. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/ docview/1314328364?accountid=13042

Mhakure, D. (2014). The contribution of course materials to a social justice agenda: Lessons from a quantitative literacy course for undergraduate social science students. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1190–1197. https://doi.org/10.59 01/mjss.2014.v5n23p1190

Nuraeni, E., Redjeki, S., & Rahmat, A. (2010). Perkembangan literasi kuantitatif mahasiswa biologi dalam perkuliahan anatomi tumbuhan berbasis dimensi belajar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(2), 127–135. http://dx. doi.org/10.17977/jip. v21i2.5836

Responsibility, C. (2011). Value r. Retrieved August 3, 2017, from https://www. google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjozpivlu_WAhUEpJQKHYjkCUoQFggtMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmanoa.hawaii.edu%2Fassessment%2FMSC%2FQuantitativeLiteracy_VALUErubric.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3pnWhONFDBZoNkwIH9pGJp

Rhodes, T. L., & Finley, A. (2013). Using the value rubrics for improvement of learning and authentic assessment case study: University of north carolina wilmington use of aac&u value rubrics. (T. L. Rhoeds & A. Finley, Eds.). Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from https://www.eou.edu/ctl/ files/2012/10/E-VALRUBR2.pdf

Ricchezza, V. J., & Vacher, H. L. (2015). Review of developing quantitative literacy skills in history and the social sciences: A web-based common core approach by Kathleen W. Craver. Scholar Commons University of South Florida, 8(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.8.2.14

Ricchezza, V. J., & Vacher, H. L. (2017). Quantitative literacy in the affective domain: Computational geology students’ reactions to devlin’s the math instinct. Scholar Commons University of South Florida, 10(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/ht tp://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.10.2.11

Stacey, K. (2015). The international Assessment of mathematical literacy: PISA 2012 framework and items. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 771–790). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_43.

Survani, R., Ardiansyah, R., & Nurqalbi, N. (2014). Kemampuan analisis informasi versus usaha mental mahasiswa dalam perkuliahan anatomi tumbuhan untuk menunjang literasi kuantitatif. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences Forum 2014, 361–366. Retrieved from http://prosiding. upgrismg.ac.id.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-26

Issue

Section

21st Century Skills