Two sides of the same coin: Student justification for or against evolutionary theory

Authors

  • Pratchayapong Yasri Institute for Innovative Learning, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom
  • Thanakorn Maleesut International Demonstration School, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5305

Keywords:

acceptance, evolution, cognitive authority, religion

Abstract

Students accepting evolution are likely to rely on science as cognitive authority (i.e. science textbooks and science teachers). In contrast, those not accepting are likely to rely on religion as cognitive authority (i.e. religious texts and religious leaders).  A thematic analysis based on existing quantitative and qualitative studies has been carried out in order to propose a theoretical framework for a range of reasons contributing to students' acceptance and rejection of evolutionary theory. This article urges that instruction of evolution is more than the matter of delivering scientific contents. It also deals with personal worldviews influenced by different forms of cognitive authority. It is therefore important to put more emphasis on developing students’ learning skills to critically evaluate which source of information is scientifically appropriate, with full respect to religious belief of individuals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, R. D. (2007). Teaching the theory of evolution in social, intellectual, and pedagogical context. Science Education, 91(4), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20204.

Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503

Clores, M., & Limjap, A. (2006). Diversity of students' beliefs about biological evolution. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790600607960

Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher,, 35(3), 125–129. DOI: 10.2307/4444260

Donnelly, L., Kazempour, M., & Amirshokoohi, A. (2009). High school students' perceptions of evolution instruction: Acceptance and evolution learning experiences. Research in Science Education, 39, 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9097-6

Downie, J., & Barron, N. (2000). Evolution and religion: attitudes of Scottish first year biology and medical students to the teaching of evolutionary biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655704.

Eve, R., Losh, S., & Nzekwe, B. (2010). Lessons from the Social Psychology of Evolution Warfare: Good Science Alone is not enough. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0232-2

Francis, L., & Greer, J. (1999). Attitudes towards creationism and evolutionary theory: the debate among secondary pupils attending Catholic and Protestant schools in Northern Ireland. Public Understanding of Science, 8(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/2/302

Francis, L., Gibson, H., & Fulljames, P. (1990). Attitude towards Christianity, Creationism, Scientism and Interest in Science among 11-15 Year Olds. British Journal of Religious Education, 13(1), 4–17.

Fulljames, P., Gibson, H., & Francis, L. (1991). Creationism, Scientism, Christianity and Science: A Study in Adolescent Attitudes. British Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192910170208

Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students' perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20233

Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2007). Students’ preconceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as “Lamarckian” when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science & Education, 16, 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9019-9

Larson, E. J., & Witham, L. (1998). Leading scientists still reject God. Nature, 394(6691), 313–313. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/28481.pdf?origin=ppub

Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The Importance of Understanding the Nature of Science for Accepting Evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8

Martin, J. W. (2010). Compatibility of major US Christian denominations with evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(3), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0221-5

Martin-Hansen, L. (2008). First-Year College Students’ Conflict with Religion and Science. Science & Education, 17(4), 317–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9039-5

Özay Köse, E. (2010). Biology students “and teachers” religious beliefs and attitudes towards theory of evolution. Hacettepe Universitesi Journal of Education, 38, 189–200. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ893930

Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools*. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10020

Rasoamampianina, V. A. (2012). How is encyclopaedia authority established? School of Education. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.

Rieh, S. Y., & Hilligoss, B. (2008). College students’ credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin, Digital media, youth, and credibility-the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on digital media and learning (pp. 49–72). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Rutledge, M., & Sadler, K. (2007). Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher,, 51, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[332:ROTMOA]2.0.CO;2

Smith, M. (2013). The Role of Authority in Science and Religion with Implications for Science Teaching and Learning. Science & Education, 22(3), 605–634.

Southcott, R., & Downie, J. R. (2012). Evolution and Religion: Attitudes of Scottish Bioscience Students to the Teaching of Evolutionary Biology. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0419-9

Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students' responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20459

Wiles, J. (2010). Overwhelming scientific confidence in evolution and its centrality in science education and the public disconnect. Science Education Review, 9(1), 18–27. Retrieved from www.sciencetheearth.com/uploads/2/4/6/5/24658156/2010_wiles_overwhelming_scientific_confidence_in_evolution_and_its.pdf.

Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. London: Greenwood Press.

Winslow, M. W., Staver, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (2011). Evolution and personal religious belief: Christian university biology-related majors' search for reconciliation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1026–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20417

Woods, C. S., & Scharmann, L. C. (2001). High school students’ perceptions of evolutionary theory. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2).Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7676/5443.

Yasri, P., & Mancy, R. (2014). Understanding Student Approaches to Learning Evolution in the Context of their Perceptions of the Relationship between Science and Religion. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 24–45. https:// doi.org/10.1002/tea.21302

Yasri, P., Arthur, S., Smith, M. U., & Mancy, R. (2013). Relating Science and Religion: An Ontology of Taxonomies and Development of a Research Tool for Identifying Individual Views. Science & Education, 22(10), 2679–2707. DOI:10.1007/s11191-013-9623-4

Downloads

Published

2018-03-30

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): MARCH

Section

Holistic Learning

License

Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.