Publication Ethics

The publication of articles in peer-reviewed journals is an important model for our journal "Studi Kasus Inovasi Ekonomi (SKIE)". It is important to agree on standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers and publishers.

Publication decision

The SKIE editor is responsible for deciding which articles should be published. The basis of the editor's decision is at the discretion of the journal's editorial board and is limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

Editors evaluate manuscripts at all times for their intellectual content regardless of the race, gender, creed, religion, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
Editors and any editorial staff may not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the appropriate authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors and publishers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

Reviewer's Task

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer reviews assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Speed

Every writer who is selected and feels that his dedication article is not worthy of being reviewed and published, then the author has the right to submit his resignation to the editor

Confidentiality
Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. Articles may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.

Objectivity Standard
The review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not justified. Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment
The reviewer must identify the relevant or unpublished work cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. The reviewer should also ask the editor to note any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published articles based on personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest arising from competition, collaboration, or any other relationship or connection with the author, company, or institution to which the article is linked.

Writer's Task
Reporting Standard

The author of the original devotional report must present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be represented accurately in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. False or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are required to provide raw data in connection with articles for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), where practicable, and under no circumstances be prepared to retain the data. within a certain time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors must ensure that they have written the entirely original work, and if the author has used the work and/or words of others that this has been properly cited or cited.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications
An author may not generally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Source Acknowledgment
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Article Writing
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the reported research. All who have made significant contributions must be listed as co-authors. Where there are other people who have participated in certain substantive aspects

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have unusual hazards inherent in their use, the authors must clearly identify these in the article.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors must disclose in the article any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that could be construed to influence the results or interpretation of the article. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his self-published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the article.