Students’ science process skills and interpersonal intelligence in biology learning using guided inquiry

Authors

  • N. Nopiya Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No.67 Kuningan, 45512
  • Anna Fitri Hindriana Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No.67 Kuningan, 45512
  • S. Sulistyono Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No.67 Kuningan, 45512

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10634

Keywords:

guided inquiry, interpersonal intelligence, science process skills

Abstract

Teacher-centered learning has no ability in empowering students’ science process skills and interpersonal intelligence. This study aimed at analyzing the effect of guided inquiry on students’ Science Process Skills (SPS) and Interpersonal Intelligence (II). This quasi-experiment used nonequivalent control group design. This study involved control and experimental classes of eleventh graders in biology class in which the material learnt was respiratory system. The SPS data was collected using test instrument, whereas the II data was gained using observation sheet. The analysis results informed that the students who joint the guided inquiry class possessed the better competencies, both in their SPS (p = 0.04) and II (p = 0.001). Therefore, the guided inquiry significantly contributes toward the improvement of students’ SPS and II. The findings of this research can be the considerable information to creat the learning which acommodates students’ SPS and II.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

N. Nopiya, Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No.67 Kuningan, 45512

Anna Fitri Hindriana, Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No.67 Kuningan, 45512

S. Sulistyono, Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No.67 Kuningan, 45512

References

Abungu, H. E., Okere, M. I. O., & Wachanga, S. W. (2014). The effect of science process skills teaching approach on secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry in Nyando District, Kenya. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(6), 359–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p359

Berrocal, P. F., Extremera, N., Lopes, P. N., & Aranda, D. R. (2014). When to cooperate and when to compete: Emotional intelligence in interpersonal decision-making. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 21–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.005

Birren, J. M., & Kieboom, L. A. V. D. (2017). Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: an interpretive case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 74–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.001

Connors, P. (2019). Guided inquiry-based learning and the date label/milk waste conundrum. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 51(7), 79–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2019.05.480

Cotton, J. A. (2009). Guided inquiry: learning in the 21st century. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(1), 102–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.10.012

Ebert, L., Mollart, L., Nolan, S. J., & Jefford, E. (2020). Nurses and midwives teaching in the academic environment: An appreciative inquiry. Nurse Education Today, 84, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104263

Eskin, H., & Bekiroglu, F. O. (2013). Argumentation as a strategy for conceptual learning of dynamics. Research of Science Education, 43(5), 1939–1956. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9339-5

Freudenthaler, H. H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2005). Emotional intelligence: the convergent and discriminant validities of intra- and interpersonal emotional abilities. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 569–579. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.004

Gillies, R. M., & Rafter, M. (2020). Using visual, embodied, and language representations to teach the 5E instructional model of inquiry science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102951

Hindriana, F. A. (2016). The development of biology practicum learning based on vee diagram for reducing student cognitive load. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 61–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v1i2.39

Hong, J. C., Tsai, C. R., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Chu, K. C., Gu, J., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2019). The effect of the “prediction-observation-quiz-explanation” inquiry-based e-learning model on flow experience in green energy learning. Computers & Education, 133, 127–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.009

Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2019). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 61, 35–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.004

Lawless, K. A., Brown, S. W., Rhoads, C., Lynn, L., & Newton, S. D. (2018). Promoting students’ science literacy skills through a simulation of international negotiations: the globaled 2 project. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 389–396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.027

Linnell, J., Brian, K., Scherr, R., Nicholson, Y., Spezzano, T., Smith, M. H., & Cherr, S. Z. (2013). Using lesson artifacts to evaluate acquisition of nutrition terms and concepts and development of science process skills. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 45(4), 38–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2013.04.102

Liu, L., Xu, L., Xiao, X., Liu, L., & Li, Y. (2020). Positive influence of peers’ interpersonal character on children’s interpersonal character: The moderating role of children’s and peers’ social status. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 157–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.003

Luijk, L. U., Kruger, M., Zijlstra, B., & Volman, M. (2019). Teachers’ role in stimulating students’ inquiry habit of mind in primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102894

Makar, K., Ali, M., & Fry, K. (2018). Narrative and inquiry as a basis for a design framework to reconnect mathematics curriculum with students. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 188–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.021

Metcalf, S. J., Reilly, J. M., Kamarainen, A. M., King, J., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2018). Supports for deeper learning of inquiry-based ecosystem science in virtual environments - Comparing virtual and physical concept mapping. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 459–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.018

Michos, K., & Leo, D. H. (2020). CIDA: A collective inquiry framework to study and support teachers as designers in technological environments. Computers & Education, 143, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103679

Murphy, N. A., & Hall, J. A. (2011). Intelligence and interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 39(1), 54–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.10.001

Nenadal, L., & Mistry, R. S. (2018). Teacher reflections on using inquiry-based instruction to engage young children in conversations about wealth and poverty. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 44–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.07.008

Rey, L., & Extremera, N. (2014). Positive psychological characteristics and interpersonal forgiveness: identifying the unique contribution of emotional intelligence abilities, big five traits, gratitude and optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 199–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.030

Roller, M. C., & Zori, S. (2017). The impact of instituting process-oriented guided-inquiry learning (POGIL) in a fundamental nursing course. Nurse Education Today, 50, 72–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.003

Romero, N. A. R., Berrocal, P. F., Estrada, J. G. S., & Guajardo, J. G. (2017). Positive emotions, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships and social support as mediators between emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues, 9(1), 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbhsi.2017.08.001

Stouwe, T. V. D., Asscher, J. J., Hoeve, M., Laan, P. H. V. D., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2018). Social skills training (SST) effects on social information processing skills in justice-involved adolescents: Affective empathy as predictor or moderator. Children and Youth Services Review, 90, 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.006

Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2018). More isn’t always better: the curvilinear relationship between inquiry-based teaching and student achievement in science. Learning and Instruction, 56, 20–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.006

Ucar, S., & Trundle, K. C. (2011). Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1571–1582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.007

Wang, J., & Jou, M. (2016). Qualitative investigation on the views of inquiry teaching based upon the cloud learning environment of high school physics teachers from Beijing, Taipei, and Chicago. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 212–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.003

Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. H., & Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830

Yudarwati, G. A. (2019). Appreciative inquiry for community engagement in Indonesia rural communities. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101833

Zhang, L. (2019). “Hands-on” plus “inquiry”? Effects of withholding answers coupled with physical manipulations on students’ learning of energy-related science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 60, 199–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.001

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): MARCH

Section

Instructional Model

License

Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.