Metacognitive awareness components of high-academic ability students in biology hybrid learning: Profile and correlation

Iin Hindun, N. Nurwidodo, Azizul Ghofar Candra Wicaksono


Metacognitive awareness has been considered as one of the factors within students that determines learning success. It can be developed through a hybrid learning approach. The purpose of this quantitative research was to examine the metacognitive awareness profile of students with high-academic ability in hybrid learning implementation. The subjects of this study were the students of XI-Science class of state senior high school of Malang. The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory was used as the data collection instrument, while descriptive statistics and Pearson Product-Moment were chosen as the data analysis techniques. The results of the study informed that the students’ metacognitive awareness was divided into four categories, i.e. very good (9%), good (43%), enough (46%), and very low (2%). The three components of metacognitive awareness were classified as "enough", while the five components of students were categorized as "good". The eight metacognition components showed significant correlations each other (r > 0.41, n = 55, p < 0.01). It can be concluded that the majority of students’ metacognitive awareness was satisfactory even though there were a small proportion of students whose metacognitive awareness was not good.


high-academic ability; hybrid learning; metacognitive awareness; students’ metacognition

Full Text:



Abdellah, R. (2015). Metacognitive awareness and its relation to academic achievement and teaching performance of pre-service female teachers in Ajman University in UAE. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 174, pp. 560–567). Elsevier B.V. doi:

Adnan, A., & Bahri, A. (2018). Beyond effective teaching: Enhancing students’ metacognitive skill through guided inquiry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 954, p. 012022). doi:

Amin, I., & Sukestiyarno, Y. L. (2015). Analysis metacognitive skills on learning mathematics in high school. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(3), 213–222. Retrieved from

Bakken, L., Brown, N., & Downing, B. (2017). Early childhood education: The long-term benefits. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(2), 255–269. doi:

Beran, M. J., Brandl, J. L., Perner, J., & Proust, J. (2012). Foundations of metacognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from

Biswas, S. K. (2015). Study orientation of high and low achievers at secondary level. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(4), 31–36. Retrieved from

Chafiq, N., Benabid, A., Bergadi, M., Touri, B., Talbi, M., & Lima, L. (2014). Advantages and limits of the implementation of blended learning for development of language skills in scientific students. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 116, pp. 1546–1550). Elsevier B.V. doi:

Chauhan, A., & Singh, N. (2014). Metacognition: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 3(3), 21–22. Retrieved from

Cimatti, B. (2016). Definition, development, assessment of soft skills and their role for the quality of organizations and enterprises. International Journal for Quality Research, 10(1), 97–130. doi:

Dang, N. V., Chiang, J. C., Brown, H. M., & McDonald, K. K. (2018). Curricular activities that promote metacognitive skills impact lower-performing students in an introductory biology course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 1–9. doi:

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 1–44. doi:

Darmawan, E., Brasilita, Y., Zubaidah, S., & Saptasari, M. (2018). Enhancing metacognitive skills of students with different gender using simas eric learning model at state senior high school 6 Malang. BIOSFER: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi (BIOSFERJPB), 11(1), 47–56. doi:

Erlin, E., & Fitriani, A. (2019). Profile metacognitive awareness of biology education students in microbiology course. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157). doi:

Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners the role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved from

Fauzi, A, & Sa’diyah, W. (2019). Students’ metacognitive skills from the viewpoint of answering biological questions: Is it already good? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 317–327. doi:

Feiz, J. P. (2016). Metacognitive awareness and attitudes toward foreign language learning in the EFL context of Turkey. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 232, pp. 459–470). doi:

Haryani, S., Masfufah, Wijayati, N., & Kurniawan, C. (2018). Improvement of metacognitive skills and students’ reasoning ability through problem-based learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 983). doi:

Husamah, H. (2015). Blended project based learning: Metacognitive awareness of biology education new students. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(4), 274–281. doi:

Hussain, D. (2015). Meta-cognition in mindfulness: A conceptual analysis. Psychological Thought, 8(2), 132–141. doi:

Jabeen, S., & Ahmad, M. (2013). A study on need achievement of high and low achievers. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(4), 225–235. Retrieved from

Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 28(1), 64–80. doi:

Kevin, D. (2011). Impact of problem‐based learning on student experience and metacognitive development. Multicultural Education &amp; Technology Journal, 5(1), 55–69. doi:

Khair, I. (2019). School zoning system: Problem or solution. Retrieved from

Kiviniemi, M. T. (2014). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1–7. doi:

Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educ Eval Policy Anal., 39(1), 146–170. doi:

Kuvac, M., & Koc, I. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on the metacognitive awareness of pre-service science teachers. Educational Studies, 00(00), 1–21. doi:

Lukitasari, M., Hasan, R., & Murtafiah, W. (2019). Using critical analysis to develop metacognitive ability and critical thinking skills in biology. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(1), 151–158. doi:

Miller, T. M. (2017). Measurement, theory, and current issues in metacognition: An overview. ACS Symposium Series, 1269, 1–15. doi:

Millis, B. J. (2016). Using metacognition to promote learning. IDEA Paper, 63(December), 1–9. Retrieved from Papers/IDEA Papers/PaperIDEA_63.pdf

Nunaki, J. H., Damopolii, I., Kandowangko, N. Y., & Nusantari, E. (2019). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning to train the students’ metacognitive skills based on gender differences. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 505–516. doi:

Nurajizah, U., Windyariani, S., & Setiono, S. (2018). Improving students’ metacognitive awareness through implementing learning journal. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 105–112. doi:

Öz, H. (2016). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation: A cross-sectional study in teacher education context of Turkey. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 232, pp. 109–121). doi:

Pantiwati, Y., & Husamah, H. (2017). Self and peer assessments in active learning model to Increase metacognitive awareness and cognitive abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 185–202. doi:

Patterson, J. (2011). Metacognitive skills. In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1583–1584). New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:

Ramakrisnan, P., Yahya, Y. B., Hasrol, M. N. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). Blended learning: A suitable framework for e-learning in higher education. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 67, pp. 513–526). Elsevier B.V. doi:

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Tuominen, M., & Tirri, K. (2019). In search of a growth mindset pedagogy: A case study of one teacher’s classroom practices in a Finnish elementary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 204–213. doi:

Sart, G. (2014). The effects of the development of metacognition on project-based learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 131–136. doi:

Satria, D. (2019). Dampak kebijakan penerimaan peserta didik baru (PPDB) sistem zonasi di SMA Negeri 2 Bandar Lampung. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Lampung. doi:

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. doi:

Sevimli, D. (2018). Comparison of the metacognitive awareness levels between successful and unsuccessful teams in the turkish men’s second volleyball league. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(12), 2715–2720. doi:

Siagian, M. V., Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of learning materials oriented on problem-based learning model to improve students’ mathematical problem solving ability and metacognition ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 265–274. doi:

Siegesmund, A. (2016). Increasing student metacognition and learning through classroom-based learning communities and self-assessment. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(2), 204–214. doi:

Smith, A. K., Black, S., & Hooper, L. M. (2017). Metacognitive knowledge, skills, and awareness: A possible solution to enhancing academic achievement in African American adolescents. Urban Education, 1–15. doi:

Sungur, S., & Senler, B. (2009). An analysis of Turkish high school students’ metacognition and motivation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 45–62. doi:

Susilo, J., Kartono, & Mastur, Z. (2019). Analysis metacognition and communication mathematics in blended learning use google classroom. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 72–83. Retrieved from

Syarifah, H., Indriwati, S. E., & Corebima, A. D. (2016). Metacognitive skills and motivation differences between male and female Xth grade student of public senior high school in malangthroughreading questioning and answering (RQA) combined with think pair share (TPS) learning strategy. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 2(1), 10–18. doi:

Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1–32. doi:

Thomas, G. P. (2014). Metacognition and science learning. In Encyclopedia of Science Education. Springer. doi:

Tumewu, W. A., Wulan, A. R., & Sanjaya, Y. (2017). Comparison between project-based learning and discovery learning toward students’ metacognitive strategies on global warming concept. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1848). doi:

Viptri, I. S. (2019). Konflik penerapan sistem zonasi penerimaan peserta didik baru 2018 (Studi kasus pada SMPN 11 Medan). Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Retrieved from

Visser, L., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Schoonenboom, J. (2018). Differences in learning characteristics between students with high, average, and low levels of academic procrastination: Students’ views on factors influencing their learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(MAY), 1–15. doi:

Yanqun, Z. (2019). The significance and instruction of metacognition in continuing education. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 15(1), 29–37. Retrieved from

DOI: | Abstract views : 134 | PDF views : 0 |


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Hindun et al

License URL:

View JPBI Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.