Empowering students’ critical thinking skills, information literacy and cognitive learning outcome through RBL-TPS model

Siti S. Narahaubun, Johanis F. Rehena, Dominggus Rumahlatu


Abstract


The use of proper learning model by teachers’ in a class room is crucial to be done in addressing the better learning quality. This study aimed at improving learning quality by choosing the most optimum learning model.  This research was a quasi-experimental study using nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design. This study was conducted in Senior High School 9 and Senior High School 5 of Ambon in academic year 2018/2019.The total sample used in this research was 127 students. The Critical Thingking Skills (CTS) and Cognitive Learning Outcome (CLO) tests as well as information literacy observation sheets were used as the instruments to gain the data. The data obtained in terms of students’ CTS, CLO ang information literacy were analyzed using inferential statistics (ANCOVA and LSD tests). The results showed that there were significant differences among X graders’ CTS, CLO, and information literacy [F(1,124)  = 64.380, F(1,124) = 68.238  F(1,124) = 26.078 ,  p < 0.05] respectively, who were taught using RBL-TPS learning model in biodiversity material. In the other words, the RBL-TPS learning model is able to empower students’ CTS, CLO, and information literacy compared to the common learning model used by biology teachers. Thus, the used of RBL-TPS is recommended to be implemented in the other biology learning materials.

Keywords


cognitive learning outcome; critical thinking skills; information literacy; RBL-TPS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adekunle, A. P., Olla, G. O. O., Olajide, A. A., Osuji, C. N., & Adedoyin, A. O. (2019). Attitude of undergraduate students to information literacy: Bowen university experience. Journal of Balkan Libraries Union, 6(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://balkanlibraries.org/frontend/Journal/pdf/Article1_Attitude of Undergraduate Students to Information Literacy Bowen University Experience_2.pdf

Ahmed, O., & Khanam, M. (2014). Learning resources management strategies and academic achievement of secondary school students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2(1), 108–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.25215/0201.014

Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). The critical thinking skills profile of preservice biology teachers in animal physiology. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and Training, 128(179–183). doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-17.2017.30

Apriani, E. (2016). Using the think-pair-share (TPS) strategy to enhance students’ reading achievement of the seventh grade at MTSN Lumpatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 189–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.29240/bjpi.v1i2.110

Awaluddin. (2019). Resource-based learning for teaching Arabic. Journal of Arabic Learning, 2(1), 77–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v2i1.6612

Azid, N., Hasan, R., Nazarudin, N. F. M., & Md-Ali, R. (2020). Embracing industrial revolution 4.0: The effect of using web 2.0 tools on primary schools students’ mathematics achievement (fraction). International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 711–728. doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13348a

Bahtiar. (2013). Potensi pembelajaran yang memadukan strategi think pairs share (TPS) dan reading questioning answering (RQA) untuk meningkatkan sikap sosial dan penguasaan konsep biologi siswa SMA multietnis di Ternate. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi, 10(2), 1–7. Retrieved from doi: https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/prosbio/article/view/3132

Bamiro, A. O. (2015). Effects of guided discovery and think-pair-share strategies on secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry. Sage Open, 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564754

Becker, S. O., Hornung, E., & Woessmann, L. (2009). Catch me if you can: Education and catch-up in the industrial revolution. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4556. Forschungsinstitut Zur Zukunft Der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor, 5(Oktober), 1–59. Retrieved from https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp2816.pdf

Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195–2202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.366

Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environment. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.18200/JGEDC.2015214253

Boleng, D. T. (2015). Pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran think-pair-share terhadap Keterampilan berpikir kritis, hasil belajar kognitif bakteriologi mahasiswa program studi pendidikan biologi FKIP universitas mulawarman. In Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS (pp. 572–579). Retrieved from http://repository.unmul.ac.id/handle/123456789/4254

Catts, R. (2012). Indicators of adult information literacy. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2), 4–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.11645/6.2.1746

Catts, R., & Lau, J. (2008). Towards information literacy indicators. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from doi: https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/2119/1/cattsandlau.pdf

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight assessment. Insight assessment. Retrieved from https://www.kritischdenkenhbo.nl/files/uploads/2019/1566550466789-what & why critical thinking, update 2015.pdf

Febriani, R., Suratno, & Fikri, K. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran resource based learning (RBL) dikombinasikan dengan snowball throwing terhadap metakognisi dan hasil belajar biologi. Jurnal Edukasi, 2(2), 26–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v2i2.3507

Flores, K. L., Matkin, G. S., Burbach, M. E., Quinn, C. E., & Harding, H. (2012). Deficient critical thinking skills among collage graduates: Implication for leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(2), 212–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00672.x

Ghozali, I. (2018). Educational challenges to the 4.0 industrial revolution: Experience from Indonesia. The International Academin Seminar, 1–7. Retrieved from doi: http://ustjogja.ac.id/journal/download/4th_Industrial_Revolution.pdf

Hamdan, R. K. A. (2017). The Effect of (think-pair-share) strategy on the achievement of third grade student in sciences in the educational district of Irbid. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9), 88–95. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1139082

Hetika, H., Farida, I., & Sari, Y. P. (2017). Think Pair Share (TPS) as Mmethod to improve student’s learning motivation and learning achievement. Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(2), 125–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v12i2.13561

Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Education Technology Research Development, 49(3), 37–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504914

Jatmiko, A., Kartina, Y., Irwandani, Fakhri, J., Pricilia, A., & Rahayu, T. (2018). Reading concept map-think pair share (remap-TPS) learning model on cognitive ability and scientific attitude. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 183–195. doi: https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3184

Kabataş Memiş, E., & Çakan Akkaş, B. N. (2020). Developing critical thinking skills in the thinking-discussion-writing cycle: the argumentation-based inquiry approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(3), 441–453. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09635-z

Kaddoura, M. (2013). Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students’ critical thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(4), 3–24. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1061947

Kayembe, C., & Nel, D. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for education in the fourth industrial revolution. African Journal of Public Affairs, 11(3), 79–94. Retrieved from https://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-19605d342e

Khaeriyah, E., Warsiti, & Kartika, C. S. (2015). Penerapan model resource based learning (RBL) dengan pendekatan scientific dalam peningkatan pembelajaran IPA di kelas IV SDN 1 Klapasawit tahun ajaran 2014/2015. Alam Cendekia, 3(5), 551–555. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjb0-Ttvr_rAhWSbysKHbDtC8AQFjABegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdigilib.uns.ac.id%2Fdokumen%2Fdownload%2F48745%2FMTkxMTQy%2FPenerapan-model-resource-based-learning-rbl-dengan-pendekatan-sc

Khan, M. L., & Idris, I. K. (2019). Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: a reasoned action and information literacy perspective. Behaviour and Information Technology, 38(12), 1194–1212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1578828

Kuhlthau, C. C. (1987). Information skills for an information society: A review of research. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED297740

Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 239–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4

Laverty, C. C. (2000). Resource-based learning: Gateway to information literacy. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309763067_Resource-Based_Learning_Gateway_to_Information_Literacy

Mahardini, T., Khaerunisa, F., Wijayanti, I. W., & Salimi, M. (2018). Research based learning (RBL) to improve critical thinking skills. SHEs: Conference Series, 1(2), 466–473. doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v1i2.26816

Mariyam, & Nuraida, D. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran brain based learning dipadukan dengan mind mapping terhadap penguasaan konsep siswa. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 4(1), 494–497. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/18482

Martin, J. (2013). Refreshing information literacy learning from recent british information literacy models. Communications in Information Literacy, 7(2), 114–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2013.7.2.142

McLaughlin, A. C., & McGill, A. E. (2017). Explicitly teaching critical thinking skills in a history course. Science & Education, 26(1–2), 93–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9878-2

Melendres, G. O. (2015). Resource-based learning (RBL) strategy to improve information literacy in general science of freshmen secondary students. In Proceeding of the 3rd Global Summit on Education GSE (pp. 290–297). Retrieved from https://worldconferences.net/proceedings/gse2015/paper gse15/G 105 RESOURCE-BASED LEARNING (RBL) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE INFORMATION LITERACY IN GENERAL SCIENCE OF FRESHMEN SECONDARY STUDENTS - GENEVAIVE.pdf

Noguez, J., & Neri, L. (2019). Research-based learning: a case study for engineering students. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13(4), 1283–1295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00570-x

Nugraha, M. (2018). Penerapan model pembelajaran resource based learning (RBL) dalam upaya meningkatkan kemampuan penguasaan konsep IPA. Mendidik: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 4(1), 71–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.30653/003.201841.45

Ogunyebi, & Henry, T. (2018). Enhancing science performance through think-pair strategies among college of education students in integrated science in Ekiti State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Evaluation, 4(4), 55–66. Retrieved from https://iiardpub.org/get/IJEE/VOL. 4 NO. 4 2018/ENHANCING SCIENCE.pdf

Qoyyum, I. M., Jazim, & Linugung, N. (2017). Pengaruh pendekatan resource based learning dikombinasikan scramble terhadap hasil belajar siswa. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan (pp. 66–72). Palembang. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjBnaqdv7_rAhUXfisKHa1EDWwQFjAAegQIBBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.ummetro.ac.id%2Ffiles%2Fsemnasdik%2Fc31b4519734809340afe5e2097de0365.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2tBgQyOaMIWFgJ6

Rahayu, S., & Suningsih, A. (2018). The effects of type learning model numbered head together and think pair share. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 19. doi: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v1i1.27

Rofieq, A., Latifa, R., Susetyarini, E., & Purwatiningsih. (2019). Project-based learning: Improving students’ activity and comprehension through lesson study in senior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 41–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7456

Rufiana, D., & Mulyadi. (2017). Using think-pair-square-share strategy to improve students’ speaking ability for Indonesian senior high school students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 2(1), 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v2i1.5872

Rumahlatu, D., Sangur, K., & Liline, S. (2020). The effect of complex instruction team product (CITP) learning model on increase student’s skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 587–606. doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13138a

Rusmansyah, Y., Ibrahim, L., Isnawati, M., & Prahani, B. K. (2019). Innovative chemistry learning model: Improving the critical thinking skill and self-efficacy of pre-service chemistry teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 59–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.555

Saptasari, M., Sunarmi, S., Sulasmi, E. S., Wicaksono, R., & Sudrajat, A. K. (2019). Information literacy skill: An alternative to support biology student’s learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(3), 451–458. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.8768

Saridewi, N., Suryadi, J., & Hikmah, N. (2017). The implementation of discovery learning method to increase learning outcomes and motivation of student in senior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 3(2), 124–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v3i2.782

Setiawati, H., & Corebima, A. D. (2018). Improving students’ metacognitive skills through science learning by integrating PQ4R and TPS strategies at a senior high school in Parepare, Indonesia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(2), 95–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10233a

Setiyawami, Sugiyo, Sugiyono, & Rahardjo, T. J. (2019). The industrial revolution 4.0 impact on vocational education in Indonesia. In Iconect (pp. 1–5). doi: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-8-2019.2288089

Shanti, W. N., Sholihah, D. A., & Abdullah, A. A. (2018). Pengaruh pendekatan problem posing dan CTL terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika bagi siswa SMA. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 49–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.26714/jkpm.5.2.2018.49-57

Sharma, P. (2019). Digital revolution of education 4.0. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(2), 3558–4564. doi: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.A1293.129219

Singh, B., Kaur, A., & Brar, K. S. (2017). Information literacy and learning styles: An overview of resource-based studentcentred learning. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 4(3), 84–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.18231/2394-2770.2017.0012

Sinprakob, S., & Songkram, N. (2015). A proposed model of problem-based learning on social media in cooperation with searching technique to enhance critical thinking of undergraduate students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2027–2030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.871

Siregar, I. Y., Susilo, H., & Suwono, H. (2017). Pengaruh think-pair-share-Write berbasis hybrid learning terhadap keterampilan metakognitif, berpikir kreatif dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa SMA negeri 3 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3(2), 135–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v3i2.4217

Susiani, T. S., Salimi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018). Research based learning (RBL): How to improve critical thinking skills?. SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 42, pp. 2–6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200042

Taghva, F., Rezaei, N., Ghaderi, J., & Taghva, R. (2014). Studying the relationship between critical thinking skills and students’ educational achievement (eghlis universities as case study). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Science, 25, 18–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.25.18

Tamara, T. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan metode think-pair-share dan group investigation terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Indonesian Journal of Economics Education, 1(1), 73–84. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJEE/article/view/10789/6625

Tuamsuk, K. (2013). Information literacy instruction in Thailand higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 145–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.034

Vella, F. (1997). Resource-based learning. Biochemical Education, 25(2), 113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-4412(97)88299-4

Yaniwati, P., Kariadinata, R., Sari, N. M., Pramiarsih, E. E., & Mariani, M. (2020). Integration of e-learning for mathematics on resource based learning: Increasing mathematical creative thinking and self-confidence. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(6), 60–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.11915

Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Mistianah. (2015). Asesmen berpikir kritis terintegrasi tes essay. Symposium on Biology Education on Prosiding, 200–213. Retrieved from https://pbio.uad.ac.id/unduh/prosiding-symbion-2015/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11456 | Abstract views : 319 | PDF views : 319 |

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Narahaubun et al

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

View JPBI Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.