Science literacy skills through the experience of project activities with assisted local potential based learning materials

Diana Hernawati, Mohamad Amin, Mimien Henie Irawati Al Muhdhar, Sri Endah Indriwati


Scientific skills literacy is one of the skills that students need to have to support the learning process. This study aims to explain the literacy skills of the students through project experience with the help of local potential-based teaching materials. This research is a quantitative study and it used quasi-experimental design, pre-and posttest design. ANCOVA analysis was used as the data analysis technique at a significant level of 5% (p < 0.5). Analysis prerequisite tests included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality test and homogeneity of variance with Levene's-Test. All data testing was done using the SPSS version 23.0 for Windows. The results of the study show that the experience of project activities has a significant effect on the scientific literacy skills in three competencies. These competencies are to explain scientific phenomena, evaluate and design scientific investigations and interpret scientific evidence and data. Competence in evaluating and designing scientific investigations has the greatest significance compared to the other two competencies.


Literacy skills, local potential, project activities

Full Text:



Amin, M. (2017). Sadar berprofesi guru sains, sadar literasi: Tantangan guru di abad 21. In A. Rahardjanto (Ed.), Biologi, Pembelajaran, dan Lingkungan Hidup Perspektif Interdisipliner (pp. 9–20). Malang, Indonesia: Prodi Pendidikan Biologi-FKIP bekerjasama dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan dan Kependudukan (PSLK) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Retrieved from

Anelli, C. (2011). Scientific literacy: What is it, are we teaching it, and does it matter? American Entomologist, 57(4), 235–243. Retrieved from

Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 44, pp. 669–678). Elsevier Masson SAS. doi:

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, US: Holt Rinehart and Winston. Retrieved from

Baş, G. (2011). Investigating the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards English lesson. TOJNED: The Online Journal Of New Horizons In Education, 1(4), 1–15. Retrieved from

Baxter, D. (2007). Teaching strategies for adult learners. Rivier Academic Journal, 3(2), 1–3. Retrieved from

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. doi:

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2014). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. doi:

Campbell, T., Zhang, D., & Neilson, D. (2011). Model based inquiry in the high school physics classroom: An exploratory study of implementation and outcomes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 258–269. doi:

Carey, G., Malbon, E., Carey, N., Joyce, A., Crammond, B., & Carey, A. (2015). Systems science and systems thinking for public health: A systematic review of the field. BMJ Open, 5(12), 1–9. doi:

Chiang, C. L., & Lee, H. (2016). The effect of project-based learning on learning motivation and problem-solving ability of vocational high school students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709–712. doi:

Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st Century skills development through inquiry-based learning. Switzerland: Springer. doi:

Cook-Sather, A. (2010). Students as learners and teachers: Taking responsibility, transforming education, and redefining accountability. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(4), 555–575. Retrieved from

Cook, P., & Walsh, M. (2012). Collaboration and problem-based learning: Integrating information literacy into a political science. Communications in Information Literacy, 6(1), 59–72. Retrieved from

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th Ed.). New York, US: Pearson. Retrieved from

Dauer, J., & Dauer, J. (2016). A framework for understanding the characteristics of complexity in biology. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 13. doi:

Dragoş, V., & Mih, V. (2015). Scientific literacy in school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 167–172. doi:

Ghaffarzadegan, N., Larson, R., & Hawley, J. (2017). Education as a complex system. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(3), 211–215. doi:

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1–22. doi:

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. doi:

Grohs, J. R., Krik, G. R., Soledad, M. M., & Knight, D. B. (2018). Assessing systems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 110–130. doi:

Gultepe, N. (2016). High school science teachers’ views on science process skills. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(5), 779–800. doi:

Habók, A., & Nagy, J. (2016). In-service teachers’ perceptions of project-based learning. SpringerPlus, 5, 83. doi:

Heinrichs, C. R. (2016). Exploring the influence of 21st century skills in a dual language program: A case study. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 7(1), 37–56. Retrieved from

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288. doi:

Holubova, R. (2008). Effective teaching methods — Project-based learning in physics. US-China Education Review, 5(12), 27–36. Retrieved from

Hudha, A. M., Amin, M., & Bambang, S. (2016). Study of instructional models and syntax as an effort for developing ‘OIDDE’ instructional model. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 2(2), 109–124. doi:

Hung, V. H. K., Keppell, M., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2004). Learners as producers : Using project based learning to enhance meaningful learning through digital video production. In Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference. doi:

Isabekov, A., & Sadyrova, G. (2018). Project-based learning to develop creative abilities in students. In J. Drummer, G. Hakimov, M. Joldoshov, T. Köhler, & S. Udartseva (Eds.), Vocational Teacher Education in Central Asia. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects (pp. 43–49). Springer, Cham. doi:

Johnson, N. F. (2009). Simply complexity: A clear guide to complexity theory. Oxford: Oneworld. Retrieved from

Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2011). Improving the science process skills ability of science student teachers using I diagrams. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(1), 26–38. Retrieved from

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers. Retrieved from

Lewinsohn, T. M., Attayde, J. L., Fonseca, C. R., Ganade, G., Jorge, L. R., Kollmann, J., … Weisser, W. W. (2014). Ecological literacy and beyond: Problem-based learning for future professionals. AMBIO, 44(2), 154–162. doi:

Macklin, A. S. (2001). Integrating information literacy using problem-based learning. Reference Services Review, 29(4), 306–313. doi:

Mertler, C., & Reinhart, R. V. (2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation: Sixth edition. Taylor and Francis. doi:

Monat, J. P., & Gannon, T. (2018). Applying systems thinking to engineering and design. Systems, 6(3), 34. doi:

Monat, J. P., & Gannon, T. F. (2015). What is systems thinking? A review of selected literature plus recommendations. American Journal of Systems Science, 4(1), 11–26. doi:

O’Neill, M. E., & Mathews, K. (2000). A weighted least squares approach to Levene’s test of homogeneity of variance. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 42(1), 81–100. doi:

OECD. (2013). Survey international programme for international student assessment (PISA). Retrieved from

Osman, K., Hamid, S. H. A., & Hassan, A. (2009). Standard setting: Inserting domain of the 21st century thinking skills into the existing science curriculum in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2573–2577. doi:

Permana, T. I., Suwono, H., & Listyorini, D. (2016). Preliminary study of health literacy in high school student in Malang. In A. Rahardjanto (Ed.), Biologi, Pembelajaran, dan Lingkungan Hidup Perspektif Interdisipliner (pp. 430–434). Malang: Prodi Pendidikan Biologi-FKIP bekerjasama dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan dan Kependudukan (PSLK) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Retrieved from

PISA. (2015). Draft science framework. Retrieved from PISA 2015 Science Framework .pdf

Prabowo, D. L., Nurmiyati, & Maridi. (2016). Pengembangan modul berbasis potensi lokal pada materi ekosistem sebagai bahan ajar di SMA N 1 Tanjungsari, Gunungkidul. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference (Vol. 13, pp. 192–195). Surakarta: Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS. Retrieved from

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. doi:

Schwartz, K., Tessman, D., & Mcdonald, D. (2013). The value of relevant, project-based learning to youth development (Vol. 8). Retrieved from

See, Y. G., Rashid, A. M., & Bakar, A. R. (2015). The effect of project based learning on level of content knowledge of pre-vocational subject. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 369–375. doi:

Skills, T. P. for 21st C. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. P21 Framework Definitions. The Partnership for 21st Century Skill. Retrieved from

Sookpatdhe, T., & Soranastaporn, S. (2016). Simulation and project based learning for developing creativity: From classroom to real life. ThaiSim Journal: Learning Development (TSJLD), 1(1), 85–105. Retrieved from

Speros, C. (2005). Health literacy: concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(6), 633–640. doi:

Speth, E. B., Shaw, N., Momsen, J., Reinagel, A., Le, P., Taqieddin, R., & Long, T. (2014). Introductory biology students’ conceptual models and explanations of the origin of variation. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 529–539. doi:

Spraragen, M., Hanneman, L., Madni, A. M., Richey, M., Hubbard, W., & Nance, M. (2014). A complex sociotechnical systems approach to provisioning educational policies for future workforce. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 28, pp. 857–864). Elsevier Masson SAS. doi:

Swain, M. S. (2012). Perceived responsibility for learning in college students: A construct validity study. James Madison University. Retrieved from

Talat, A., & Chaudhry, H. F. (2014). The effect of PBL and 21st century skills on students’ creativity and competitiveness in private schools. The Lahore Journal of Business, 2(2), 89–114. Retrieved from Talat and Chaudhry FINAL.pdf

Tan, J. P. L., Choo, S. S., Kang, T., & Liem, G. A. D. (2017). Educating for twenty-first century competencies and future-ready learners: research perspectives from Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 425–436. doi:

Tantrarungroj, P., & Suwannatthachote, P. (2012). Enhancing pre-service teacher’s self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge in designing digital media with self-regulated learning instructional support in online project-based learning. Creative Education, 3(8B), 77–81. doi:

Tindangen, M. (2018). Inquiry-based learning model to improve higher order thinking skills. Asian Social Science, 14(7), 39–46. doi:

Trna, J., Trnova, E., & Sibor, J. (2012). Implementation of inquiry-based science education in science teacher training. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, 2(4), 199–209. Retrieved from

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. doi:

Uswatun, D. A., & Widiyanto, R. (2018). Analisis aktivitas peserta didik dalam pembelajaran berbasis scientific approach di sekolah dasar sebagai implementasi 21st century skills. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 2(2), 174–188. doi:

Vattam, S. S., Goel, A. K., Rugaber, S., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Steven, G., & Sinha, S. (2011). Understanding complex natural systems by articulating structure-behavior-function models. Educational Technology and Society, 14(1), 66–81. Retrieved from

Wilborn, J. W. (2013). Teacher self-efficacy: Common core state standards within a 21st century skills framework. Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. Liberty University. Retrieved from

Yap, W. L., Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2016). The impact of the role of teacher and balance of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in Malaysian institution of higher education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(4), 1849–1868. Retrieved from impact of the role of teacher and balance of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in Malaysian institution of higher education.pdf

Young, M. (2013). Curriculum theory: What it is and why it is important. In Proceeding of the first meeting of the European Association of Curriculum Studies (pp. 191–201). Braga: University of Minho. doi:

Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dengan tema “Isu-Isu Strategis Pembelajaran MIPA Abad 21" (pp. 1–17). Sintang-Kalimantan Barat: Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa. Retrieved from

DOI: | Abstract views : 769 | PDF views : 769 |


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Hernawati et al

License URL:

View JPBI Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.