Thinking working scaffolding sharing model to improve natural science competencies for biology pre-service teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7742Keywords:
integrated science, pre-service teacher competencies, TWSS modelAbstract
Competencies of nowadays biology pre-service teacher is an important key for the future education quality. This article aimed to discuss the effectiveness of Thinking Working Scaffolding Sharing (TWSS) model implementaton in Departement of Biology UM. This quantitative descriptive study used learning outcomes (professional and pedagogical competencies), attitudes, and group activity of biology pre-service teacher as determinant factors of the TWSS model effectiveness. The instrument to collect the data for those parameters were product assessment and observation sheet. Universitas Negeri Malang assessment guideline was utilized to determine the pre-service teachers’ competencies; meanwhile, the percentage calculation was employed as the data analysis procedure to proceed the data. The results informed: 1) the mean values of learning outcomes for professional and pedagogical competencies were 94 and 74, respectively; 2) 92% of students showed individual responsibility in completing their tasks (in which 46% was categorized as ‘excellent’ and the other 46% was considered as ‘good’); 3) 85% of students performed excellent attitude in their group work. Therefore, the implementation of TWSS model is effective to improve natural science competencies for biology pre-service teacher.Downloads
References
Abdullah, S. I. S. S., Halim, L., & Shahali, E. H. M. (2011). Integration of environmental knowledge across Biology, Physics and Chemistry subject at secondary school level in Malaysia. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 15, pp. 1024–1028). Elsevier B.V. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.233
Akhyak, Idrus, M., & Abu Bakar, Y. (2013). Implementation of teachers pedagogy competence to optimizing learners development in public primary school in Indonesia. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(9), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/September-2013/10.pdf
Alfares, N. (2017). Benefits and difficulties of learning in group work in EFL classes in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 247. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p247
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (Ninth). New York, USA: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Learning_to_Teach.html?id=B1trewAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Aslan, O., & Taşar, M. F. (2013). How do science teachers view and teach the nature of science? a classroom investigation. Education and Science, 38(167), 65–80. Retrieved from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/viewFile/1323/468
Asrizal, Ali Amran, Azwar Ananda, F. (2017). Need analysis to develop adaptive contextual learning model. In Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Teacher Education (Vol. 1, pp. 78–83). Pekanbaru. Retrieved from https://files.osf.io/v1/resources/gxqev/providers/osfstorage/5c0d14196be62d001944e02c?action=download&version=1&direct
Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., & Festiyed, F. (2018). Effectiveness of adaptive contextual learning model of integrated science by integrating digital age literacy on grade VIII students. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 335). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012067
Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education Ver. I, 5(6), 66–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670
Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding: Foundations and evolving definition. Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education: Strategies and Efficacy Evidence. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0
Bhowmik, M., Roy, B. B., & Banerjee, J. (2013). Role of pedagogy in effective teaching. Basic Research Journal of Education Research and Review, 2(1), 1–5. Retrieved from http://basicresearchjournals.org/education/pdf/Bhowmik et al.pdf
Bozhovich, E. D. (2010). Zone of proximal development. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(6), 48–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-0405470603
Browne, L., Hough, M., & Schwab, K. (2009). Scaffolding: A promising approach to fostering critical thinking. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies & Recreation Education, 24, 114–119. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sph&AN=47565351&site=ehost-live
Cave, T., Ludwar, J., & Williams, W. (2006). Brain-based learning. Retrieved from https://education.alberta.ca/apps/aisi /literature/pdfs/bbased_learning.pdf
Chiriac, E. H. (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning - students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(June), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558
Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2018). The moderating effects of group work on the relationship between motivation and cognitive load. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(1), 68–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3325
Disas, E. P. (2017). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan mengenai pengembangan dan peningkatan profesi guru. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 17(2), 158–166. Retrieved from http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JER/article/download/8251/5184
Dresner, M., De Rivera, C., Fuccillo, K. K., & Chang, H. (2014). Improving higher-order thinking and knowledge retention in environmental science teaching. BioScience, 64(1), 40–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bit005
Gaikhorst, L., Beishuizen, J. J. J., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & Volman, M. L. L. (2017). The sustainability of a teacher professional development programme for beginning urban teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 135–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1125449
Ghazi, S. R., Shahzada, G., Shah, M. T., & Shauib, M. (2013). Teacher’s professional competencies in knowledge of subject matter at secondary level in Southern Districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(2), 453–460. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1007.7988&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Hakim, A. (2015). Contribution of competence teacher (pedagogical, personality, professional competence and social) on the performance of learning. The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, 4(2), 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.theijes.com/papers/v4-i2/Version-3/A42301012.pdf
Harinie, L. T., Sudiro, A., Rahayu, M., & Fatchan, A. (2017). Study of the Bandura’s Social Cognitive Learning Theory for the entrepreneurship learning process. Social Sciences, 6(1), 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170601.11
Harrell, P. E. (2010). Teaching an integrated science curriculum: Linking teacher knowledge and teaching assignments. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(1), 145–165. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7f5d/fe1415bd3d985858d389e657d6d75e998b17.pdf
Hasan, R., & Ahmad, N. A. (2018). Conceptual framework of scaffolding literacy module to help remedial students mastering reading skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(11), 1031–1038. doi: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i11/4982
Kachalov, N., Kornienko, A., Kvesko, R., Nikitina, Y., Kvesko, S., & Bukharina, Z. (2015). Integrated nature of professional competence. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 206, pp. 459–463). Elsevier B.V. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.083
Kamamia, L. N., Ngugi, N. T., & Thinguri, R. W. (2014). To establish the extent to which the subject mastery enhances quality teaching to student-teachers during teaching practice. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7), 641–648. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/July-2014/51.pdf
Kane, S. N., Mishra, A., & Dutta, A. K. (2016). Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and students’ reasoning and wellbeing. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 755). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Kanokorn, S., Pongtorn, P., & Somjai, M. (2013). Teacher development program to enhance learning competency for small primary schools in Thailand. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 69, pp. 1052–1058). Elsevier B.V. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.032
Kurnia, A. R. D., Ibrahim, M., Widodo, W., & Nusantara, T. (2018). Multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary design to teach problem solving skills. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 218, pp. 161–166). Atlantis Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/icomse-17.2018.29
Malik, S. A. (2017). Revisiting and re-representing scaffolding: The two gradient model. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1331533
Masters, J. (2013). Scaffolding pre-service teachers representing their learning journeys with eportfolios. Journal of Learning Design, 6(1), 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i1.115
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan tentang kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum sekolah menengah pertama/madrasah tsanawiyah (2013). Indonesia. Retrieved from http://simpuh.kemenag.go.id/regulasi/permendikbud_68_13_lampiran.pdf
Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. Standar kualifikasi akademik dan kompetensi guru, Pub. L. No. 16 (2007). Indonesia. Retrieved from http://vervalsp.data.kemdikbud.go.id/prosespembelajaran/file/Permendiknas No 16 Tahun 2007.pdf
Mestrinho, N., & Cavadas, B. (2018). Innovation in teacher education: An integrative approach to teaching and learning science and mathematics. Proceedings, 2(21), 1343. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211343
Mishra, R. K. (2013). Vygotskian perspective of teaching-learning. Innovation: International Journal of Applied Research, 1(1), 21–28. Retrieved from http://ijar.publicationsupport.com/docs/paper/22.pdf
Nahdliyati, R., Parmin, P., & Taufiq, M. (2016). Efektivitas pendekatan saintifik model project based learning. Unnes Science Education Journal, 5(2), 1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v5i2.12146
Odumosu, Olisama, & Fisayi, A. (2018). Teachers’ content and pedagogical knowledge on students’ achievement in algebra. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(3), 83–94. Retrieved from https://www.ijern.com/journal/2018/March-2018/11.pdf
Ogunkola, B., & Samuel, D. (2011). Science teachers’ and students’ perceived difficult topics in the integrated science curriculum of lower secondary schools in Barbados. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 17–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p17
Philip, M. P., & Ramya, K. (2017). Professional competencies for effective teaching learning process. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development (IJTRD), (Special Issue), 25–29. Retrieved from http://www.ijtrd.com/papers/IJTRD12201.pdf
Ramdhani, N., Ancok, D., Swasono, Y., & Suryanto, P. (2013). Teacher quality improvement program: empowering teachers to increasing a quality of Indonesian’s education. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 69, pp. 1836–1841). Elsevier B.V. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.134
Ramlawati, Mun’Im, A., & Yunus, S. R. (2018). Improving pedagogical competences of prospective science teachers to develop learning materials through jigsaw cooperative model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1028) doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012209
Sainsbury, E., & Walker, R. (2009). Motivation, learning and group work–the effect of friendship on collaboration. In UniServe Science Proceedings (pp. 118–124). Retrieved from http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/IISME/article/view/6213
Sarfo, S. (2013). The relation between teacher trainees’ background in science and success in the end of first year first semester integrated science examination (a case study at St . Louis College of Education , Kumasi ). Merit Research Journal of Education and Review, 1(2), 50–57. Retrieved from https://www.meritresearchjournals.org/er/content/2013/March/Sarfo.pdf
Schleigh, S. P., Bossé, M. J., & Lee, T. (2011). Redefining curriculum integration and professional development: In-service teachers as agents of change. Current Issues in Education, 14(3), 1–14. Retrieved from https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/693
Semmar, Y., & Al-Thani, T. (2015). Piagetian and Vygotskian approaches to cognitive development in the kindergarten classroom. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v5n2p1
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237
Sinaga, P., & Suhandi, A. (2015). The effectiveness of scaffolding design in training writing skills Physics teaching materials. International Journal, 8(1), 19–34. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085295
Soewarno, S., & Hidayat, A. (2012). The implementation of integrated science learning in junior high schools in Banda Aceh. Jurnal Serambi Ilmu, 13(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.32672/si.v13i1.1042
Sudjito, D. N., Keliat, N. R., & Hastuti, S. P. (2018). Integrated science learning using scientific approach in junior high schools in Semarang Regency. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 2(1), 69–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v2i1.583
Surya, P. (2016). Student teacher recruitment in Indonesia: An initial step to promote teacher professionalism and teaching professionalization. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational, Management, Administration and Leadership (Vol. 14, pp. 457–462). Paris, France: Atlantis Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/icemal-16.2016.94
Syafitri, R. (2017). Meningkatkan tanggung jawab belajar melalui strategi giving questions and getting answers pada siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 1(2), 57–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v1i2.12623
Syifahayu. (2017). Inquiry-based integrated science education: implementation of local content “soil washing” project to improve junior high school students’ environmental literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 012082 doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012082
Thitima, G., & Sumalee, C. (2012). Scientific thinking of the learners learning with the knowledge construction model enhancing scientific thinking. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 46, pp. 3771–3775). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.144
Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). The four scaffolding modules for collaborative problem-based learning through the computer network on moodle lms for the computer programming course. International Education Studies, 6(5), 47–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n5p47
Tolessa, M. D., Sorale, J. E., & Sultan, A. (2017). Student perception on group work and group assignments in classroom teaching: The case of Bule Hora university second year biology students, South Ethiopia: An action research. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(17), 860–866. doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.3006
Triwinarni, E. (2017). Evaluasi program Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) Pendidikan Agama Islam di UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. In Prosiding Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Student Conference (pp. 219–223). Retrieved from http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/8545
Vrioni, R. (2011). Effects of group learning on the academic performance of university students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 33, 111-. Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/files/pdf/vol33/111-117.Vrioni_Vol.33.pdf
Yenni, R., Hernani, & Widodo, A. (2017). The implementation of integrated science teaching materials based socio-scientific issues to improve students scientific literacy for environmental pollution theme. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1848). AIP Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983970
Yusnani, Y. (2018). Theoretical perspectives on cooperative learning. In KnE Social Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 976–986). https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.2005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
