Moderated effect of teachers’ attitudes to the contribution of technology competencies on TPACK

Authors

  • Hendra Yulisman Science Education, School of Post Graduates, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No.229, Bandung city, West Java http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8451-3070
  • Ari Widodo Science Education, School of Post Graduates, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No.229, Bandung city, West Java
  • R. Riandi Science Education, School of Post Graduates, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No.229, Bandung city, West Java
  • Cut Intan Evtia Nurina Science Education, School of Post Graduates, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No.229, Bandung city, West Java

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7818

Keywords:

science teacher’s TPACK, teacher’s attitudes, technology competencies

Abstract

Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) can be seen as teacher’s skills and abilities in choosing and using technology effectively. However, information about the teacher’s attitudes contribution to technology competencies and science teacher's TPACK is still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the relationship between teacher's technology competencies and their TPACK as well as the effect of teacher’s attitudes as a moderating effect on relation between these two variables. This survey research used total sampling technique which involved 88 science teachers from junior high school of Kota Banda Aceh. The instruments consisted of questionnaires and multiple-choice test which were distributed directly to the teachers. The data analysis was performed by using the Partial Least Square approach. The results showed that technology competencies have a positive relation to TPACK; likewise, the teachers’ attitudes in technology integration were able to strengthen the positive relation between technology competency and science teacher’s TPACK. Therefore, teacher's attitude is an important factor should be concerned in improving teacher's TPACK.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustin, R. R., Liliasari, Sinaga, P., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). The investigation of science teachers’ experience in integrating digital technology into science teaching. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1013). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012079

Anwar, Y., Rustaman, N. Y., Widodo, A., & Redjeki, S. (2014). Kemampuan pedagogical content knowledge guru biologi yang berpengalaman dan yang belum berpengalaman. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 19(1), 69–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i1.426

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Standar kualifikasi akademik dan kompetensi guru, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 § (2007). Indonesia: Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from http://vervalsp.data.kemdikbud.go.id/prosespembelajaran/file/Permendiknas No 16 Tahun 2007.pdf

Baturay, M. H., Gökçearslan, Ş., & Ke, F. (2017). The relationship among pre-service teachers computer competence, attitude towards computer-assisted education, and intention of technology acceptance. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(1), 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2017.10003119

Bilici, S. C., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science and Technological Education, 34(2), 237–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050

Birkollu, S. S., Yucesoy, Y., Baglama, B., & Kanbul, S. (2017). Investigating the attitudes of pre-service teachers towards technology based on various variables. TEM Journal, 6(3), 578–583. doi: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM63-20

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136–155. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1084227.pdf

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers and Education, 57(1), 1184–1193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007

Chow, P., & Pepe, T. M. (2015). Teacher’s attitudes towards technology in the classroom. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (April), 1–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201200111

Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2017). Professional development for international teachers: Examining TPACK and technology integration decision making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 117–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1314780

Dawson, J. (2019). Interpreting interaction effects. Retrieved from http://www.jeremydawson.co.uk/slopes.htm

Deng, F., Chai, C. S., So, H. J., Qian, Y., & Chen, L. (2017). Examining the validity of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework for preservice chemistry teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3508

Drajati, N. A., Tan, L., Haryati, S., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Zainnuri, H. (2018). Investigating English language teachers in developing TPACK and multimodal literacy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 575–582. doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9806

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 4(47), 47–61. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02299597

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3642866/How_to_Design_and_Evaluate_Research_in_Education

Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural equation modelling: Metode alternatif dengan Partial Least Squares (PLS) (4th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Imam_Ghozali/publication/289674653_Structural_Equation_Modeling_Metode_Alternatif_dengan_Partial_Least_Squares_PLS/links/5691e1ec08aee91f69a5224e/Structural-Equation-Modeling-Metode-Alternatif-dengan-Partial-Least-Squa

Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares, konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk penelitian empiris (2nd ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Retrieved from http://onesearch.id/Record/IOS3107.UMS:57482

Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Long Range Planning (Vol. 46). California: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Qais_Almaamari3/post/How_can_I_justify_in_a_reflective_second-order_construct_to_drop_some_dimensions_which_not_perform_well/attachment/5a79c437b53d2f0bba5042d9/AS%3A591053426008064%401517929526701/download/3b.+Hair+Bo

Huda, I., Yulisman, H., Nurina, C. I. E., Erni, F., & Abdullah, D. (2018). Investigating pre-service teachers about their competencies, experiences, and attitudes towards technology integration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1), 012033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012033

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology and Society, 21(3), 48–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00623-5

Karaca, F., Can, G., & Yildirim, S. (2013). A path model for technology integration into elementary school settings in Turkey. Computers and Education, 68, 353–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.017

Kimmons, R. (2015). Examining TPACK’s theoretical future. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 53–77. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1051712

Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2018). How useful are our models? Pre-service and practicing teacher evaluations of technology integration models. TechTrends, 62(1), 29–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0227-8

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science, 41(4), 793–809. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9249-y

Latan, H., & Ramli, N. A. (2013). The results of Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation modelling analyses (PLS-SEM). SSRN Electronic Journal, (October 2017), 2–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364191

Magana, S., & Marzano, R. J. (2014). Enhancing the art & science of teaching with technology (classroom strategies). Bloomington: Marzano Research. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/18474733-enhancing-the-art-science-of-teaching-with-technology

Mahdum. (2015). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) of English teachers in Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 168–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p168

Miskiah, M., Suryono, Y., & Sudrajat, A. (2019). Integration of information and comunication technology into Islamic Religious Education Teacher Training. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 130–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.23439

Niederhauser, D. S., & Lindstrom, D. L. (2018). Instructional technology integration models and frameworks: Diffusion, competencies, attitudes, and dispositions. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Handbook on Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 335–355). Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_23

Nofrion, N., Wijayanto, B., Wilis, R., & Novio, R. (2018). Analisis Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) guru geografi di Kabupaten Solok, Sumatera Barat. JURNAL GEOGRAFI, 10(2), 105–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v10i2.9070

Pusparini, F., Riandi, R., & Sriyati, S. (2017). Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in animal physiology. In Journal of Physics: Conf. Series (Vol. 895, p. 012052). IOP Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012059

Ringle, C., Wende, W. S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GMBH. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com

Saifullah, M. (2017). Ini terobosan bidang pendidikan 100 hari kerja Irwandi-Nova. Retrieved from http://portalsatu.com/read/news/ini-terobosan-bidang-pendidikan-100-hari-kerja-irwandi-nova-36478

Sánchez, A.-B., Marcos, J.-J. M., González, M., & GuanLin, H. (2012). In service teachers’ attitudes towards the use of ICT in the classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1358–1364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.302

Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003

Sholihah, M., & Yuliati, L. (2016). Peranan TPACK terhadap kemampuan calon guru Fisika dalam pembelajaran post-pack. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 144–153. Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/6115

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan (Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta. Retrieved from http://pustaka.unm.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=35458

Supriyadi, S., Bahri, S., & Waremra, R. S. (2018). Kemampuan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) mahasiswa pada matakuliah strategi belajar mengajar fisika. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 8(2), 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.21067/jip.v8i2.2632

Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Sointu, E. (2018). Differences in pre-service teachers’ knowledge and readiness to use ICT in education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(2), 174–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12225

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ Twenty-First Century Skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 15–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Kukkonen, J. (2015). Developing a TPACK measurement instrument for 21 st century pre-service teachers. Retrieved from https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/seminar/article/view/2353

Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers and Education, 118, 70–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009

Widodo, A. (2017). Experienced biology teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) on photosynthesis. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1848, p. 060017). American Institute of Physics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983985

Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24, 1–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e328332f801

Yanti, H., Setiawan, A., Nurhabibah, & Yannuar. (2018). Teacher’s perception about the use of E-Learning/Edmodo in educational activities. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 306). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012055

Yavuz, S. (2005). Developing a technology attitude scale for pre-service chemistry teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 4(1), 17–25. Retrieved from http://tojet.net/articles/v4i1/412.pdf

Yerdelen-Damar, S., Boz, Y., & Aydın-Günbatar, S. (2017). Mediated effects of technology competencies and experiences on relations among attitudes towards technology use, technology ownership, and self efficacy about Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(4), 394–405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9687-z

Yulisman, H. (2017). Perceptions of education lecturers in the implementation of mobile learning. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(9), 518–524. doi: https://doi.org/DOI: 10.18768/ijaedu.370413

Yurdakul, I. K., & Coklar, A. N. (2014). Modeling preservice teachers’ TPACK competencies based on ICT usage. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 363–376. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12049

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): JULY

Section

Teacher Professional Profile and Development

License

Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.