Students’ perceptions concerning the learning environment based on biology teachers’ TPACK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7819Keywords:
biology teachers’ TPACK, learning environment, students’ perceptionsAbstract
Research about students’ perceptions concerning the learning environment based on biology teachers’ TPACK still limited. The purpose of this study was to obtain information about the impact of biology teachers’ TPACK on students’ perceptions concerning their learning environment. TPACK scores were obtained from instrument in the form of multiple-choice test questions. Furthermore, students’ perceptions of their learning environment were obtained using a Likert scale questionnaire. Two biology teachers were used as research samples determined by purposive sampling, which is referring to their TPACK score. Furthermore, students who became the research sample were students from those two teachers that consists of 64 students. The analysis results show that teachers have different TPACK ability at the level of TPACK forming components. Furthermore, there are differences in students' perceptions based on their teachers' TPACK ability. The results were indicated teacher professionalism, in this case, TPACK has the impact on learning environment. Therefore, teachers, schools, government, and education providers are expected to give special attention to teacher professionalism.
Downloads
References
Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 131–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9122-6
Agustin, R. R., Liliasari, Sinaga, P., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). The investigation of science teachers’ experience in integrating digital technology into science teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012079
Akturk, A. O., & Ozturk, H. S. (2019). Teachers’ TPACK levels and students’ self-efficacy as predictors of students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 5(1), 283–294. Retrieved from https://www.ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/543
Alt, D. (2018). Teachers’ practices in science learning environments and their use of formative and summative assessment tasks. Learning Environments Research, 21(3), 387–406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10 984-018-9259-z
Anwar, Y., Rustaman, N. Y., Widodo, A., & Redjeki, S. (2014). Kemampuan pedagogical content knowledge guru biologi yang berpengalaman dan yang belum berpengalaman. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 19(1), 69–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i1.426
Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2019). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1141–1175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z
Barr, J. J. (2016). Developing a positive classroom climate. Idea, Idea paper(October), 1–9. Retrieved from https://www.ideaedu.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/IDEA Papers/IDEA Papers/PaperIDEA_61.pdf
Borůvková, R., & Emanovský, P. (2016). Problems of education in the 21st century small group learning methods and their effect on learners’ relationships. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 70, 45–58. Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/files/pdf/vol70/45-58.Boruvkova_Vol.70_PEC. pdf
Chai, C. S., Ling Koh, J. H., Tsai, C. C., & Lee Wee Tan, L. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers and Education, 57(1), 1184–1193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
Das, K., Gryseels, M., Sudhir, P., & Tan, K. T. (2016). Unlocking Indonesia’s digital opportunity. In McKinsey Indonesia Office October. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Locations/Asia/Indonesia/Our Insights/Unlocking Indonesias digital opportunity/Unlocking_Indonesias_digital_opportunity.ashx
Deng, F., Chai, C. S., So, H. J., Qian, Y., & Chen, L. (2017). Examining the validity of the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework for preservice chemistry teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3508
Evens, M., Elen, J., Larmuseau, C., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Promoting the development of teacher professional knowledge: Integrating content and pedagogy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 244–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.001
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. Retrieved from https://saochhengpheng.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/jack_fraenkel_norman_wallen_helen_hyun-how_to_design_and_evaluate_research_in_education_8th_edition_-mcgraw-hill_humanities_social_sciences_languages2011.pdf
Gupta, A., & Fisher, D. (2012). Technology-supported learning environments in science classrooms in India. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 195–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9103-9
Huda, M. (2019). The problematic: Teachers’ pedagogical ability in using technology on mathematics learning of junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1200(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1200/1/012009
Indayani, L. (2015). Peningkatan prestasi belajar peserta didik melalui penggunaan media KIT IPA di SMP Negeri 10 Probolinggo. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 3(1), 54–60. Retrieved from http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jmkpp/article/download/2197/2346
Khalil, N., & Aldridge, J. (2019). Assessing students’ perceptions of their learning environment in science classes in the United Arab Emirates. Learning Environments Research, (0123456789). doi: https://doi.o rg/10.1007/s10984-019-09279-w
Khine, M. S., Fraser, B. J., Afari, E., Oo, Z., & Kyaw, T. T. (2018). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment in tertiary science classrooms in Myanmar. Learning Environments Research, 21(1), 135–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9250-0
King, J. (2019). Asked students to help each other understand ideas or concepts. Retrieved February 14, 2019, from IDEA website: https://www.ideaedu.org/Client-Resources/Teaching-Learning-Resources/Asked-students-to-help-each-other-understand-ideas-or-concepts
Koehler, M., Greenhalgh, S., Rosenberg, J., & Keenan, S. (1993). What the tech is going on with teachers’ digital teaching portfolios? Using the TPACK framework to analyze teachers’ technological understanding. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(1), 31–59. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173346/
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science, 41(4), 793–809. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9249-y
Kusuma, A. W. (2018). Meningkatkan kerjasama siswa dengan metode Jigsaw. Konselor, 7(1), 26–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.24036/02018718458-0-00
Lestari, S. (2015). Analisis kemampuan technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pada guru biologi SMA dalam materi sistem saraf. In A. Saputra (Ed.), Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 2015 (Vol. 1, pp. 123–136). Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/7006
McKemmish, S., Anwar, M., & Ardianto, D. (2017). IT empowering communities: How social media and mobile technologies shape Indonesia’s community landscape. Retrieved February 14, 2019, from Monash Doctoral Information Day website: https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/1442855/IT-Empowering-Communities-How-social-media-and-mobile-technologies-shape-Indonesias-community-landscape.pdf
Nofrion, Wijayanto, B., Wilis, R., & Novio, R. (2018). Analisis technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) guru geografi di Kabupaten Solok, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Geografi, 10(2), 105–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v10i2.9070
Nurina, C. I. E. (2017). Science education teaching and learning activity in Islamic boarding school. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(9), 484–491. Retrieved from http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org/tr/download/article-file/390136
Pielmeier, M., Huber, S., & Seidel, T. (2018). Is teacher judgment accuracy of students’ characteristics beneficial for verbal teacher-student interactions in classroom? Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 255–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.002
Poushter, J., Bishop, C., & Chwe, H. (2018). Social media use continues to rise in developing countries but plateaus across developed ones: Digital divides remain, both within and across countries. Retrieved from https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/06/15135408/Pew-Research-Center_Global-Tech-Social-Media-Use_2018.06.19.pdf
Pusparini, F., Riandi, R., & Sriyati, S. (2017). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in animal physiology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012052. doi: https://doi.org /10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012052
Rehmat, A. P., & Bailey, J. M. (2014). Technology integration in a science classroom: Preservice teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 744–755. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007 /s10956-014-9507-7
Rosegard, E., & Wilson, J. (2013). Capturing students’ attention: An empirical study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 1–20. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017063.pdf
Rosita, I., & Leonard, L. (2015). Meningkatkan kerja sama siswa melalui pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think pair share. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3(1), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3 i1.108
Salam, U., Lee, S., Fullerton, V., Yusuf, Y., Krantz, S., & Henstridge, M. (2018). Indonesia case study: Rapid technological change – challenges and opportunities. (No. No. 8). Retrieved from https://pathwayscommission.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-09/indonesia_case_study_rapid_technological_change.pdf
Sandilos, L. E., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Cohen, J. J. (2017). Warmth and demand: The relation between students’ perceptions of the classroom environment and achievement growth. Child Development, 88(4), 1321–1337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12685
Sartika, W., Said, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2013). Masalah-masalah interaksi sosial siswa dengan teman sebaya di sekolah. KONSELOR: Jurnal Ilmiah Konseling, 2(1), 141–145. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/konselor/article/view/877/736
Srisawasdi, N. (2014). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in using computerized science laboratory environment: An arrangement for science teacher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(1), 123–143. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/14f0/7d71ad66ea44d58b23d10f6a2344afc08c2c.pdf
Sulisworo, D., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Nursulistiyo, E., & Handayani, T. (2019). Mobile learning infusion through enhancing teachers’ perception: Case study in eastern of Indonesia. International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity (STEACH 2018), 277, 85–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/steach-18.2019.19
Swallow, M. J. C., & Olofson, M. W. (2017). Contextual understandings in the TPACK framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 228–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017. 1347537
Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Sointu, E. (2018). Differences in pre-service teachers’ knowledge and readiness to use ICT in education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34, 174–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12225
Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 15–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518
Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Kukkonen, J. (2015). Developing a TPACK measurement instrument for 21 st century pre-service teachers. International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 11(2), 87–100. Retrieved from https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/seminar/article/view/2353/2182
Widodo, A. (2017). Experienced biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) on photosynthesis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848, 060017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983985
Widodo, A., Maria, R. A., & Fitriani, A. (2017). Constructivist learning environment during virtual and real laboratory activities. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(1), 11-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i1.7959
Yeh, Y. F., Lin, T. C., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Hwang, F. K. (2015). Science teachers’ proficiency levels and patterns of TPACK in a practical context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 78–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
