Developing digital multimedia of human anatomy and physiology material based on STEM education

Authors

  • Nuril Hidayati Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Exact and Sport Science Education, IKIP Budi Utomo, Jl. Citandui 46, Malang 65122
  • Farizha Irmawati Department of Physical Health Education and Recreation, Faculty of Exact and Sport Science Education, IKIP Budi Utomo, Jl. Citandui 46, Malang 65122

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.8584

Keywords:

critical thinking, multimedia, STEM education

Abstract

The development of multimedia based on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) to empower students critical thinking skills has not been optimally carried out. The purpose of this research was to develop multimedia of human anatomy and physiology material based on STEM which improve students’ critical thinking skills. This research and development (R&D) used 4D Thiagarajan development model which consisted of define, design, develop, and disseminate. The instruments used were interview guidelines, observation sheets, questionnaires, and test. The data obtained consisted of quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data was obtained from the test results and the assessments of respondents using a Likert scale, while the qualitative data in the form of experts recommendations. The results showed that the media developed were classified as valid with the scores were 96.89% (media aspects), 97.53% (usefulness), and 85.22% (readability). Furthermore, the prerequisite test results showed that the data are spread normally (p>0.05) and homogeneously (p>0.05) so that the ANACOVA test is continued. The ANACOVA test results showed that students' critical thinking skills taught with multimedia were significantly difference (sig <0.05).This study recommends the use of multimedia in learning human anatomy and physiology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aflalo, E., & Gabay, E. (2013). Learning approach and learning: Exploring a new technological learning system. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070114

Akopian, D., Melkonyan, A., Golgani, S. C., Yuen, T. T., & Saygin, C. (2013). A template-based short course concept on android application development. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 13–28. Retrieved from https://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0942852

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (Eighth). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://www.modares.ac.ir/uploads/Agr.Oth.Lib.12.pdf

Ashaver, D., & Igyuve, S. M. (2013). The use of audio-visual materials in the teaching and learning processes in colleges of education in Benue State-Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 1(6), 44–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0164455

Azizah, Z. F., Kusumaningtyas, A. A., Anugraheni, A. D., & Sari, D. P. (2018). Validasi preliminary product Fung-Cube pada pembelajaran fungi untuk siswa SMA. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 6(1), 15. doi: https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i1.7364

Bahar, M., Aydin, F., & Karakirik, E. (2009). A diagnostic study of computer application of structural communication grid. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 8(2), 5–19. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v8i2/821.pdf

Baharin, N., Kamarudin, N., & Manaf, U. K. A. (2018). Integrating STEM education approach in enhancing higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 810–821. doi: https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i7/4421

Bahri, S., Syamsuri, I., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Pengembangan modul keanekaragaman hayati dan virus berbasis model inkuiri terbimbing untuk siswa kelas X MAN 1 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 127–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i2.6113

Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2013). An instrument for assessing scientists’ written skills in public communication of science. Science Communication, 35(1), 56–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012440634

Bellanca, J., Brandt, R., Barell, J., Darling-Hammond, L., Dede, C., Dufour, R., … Seif, E. (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 1–27). Solution Tree Press. Retrieved from http://www.edugains.ca/resources21CL/Research/Readings/21stCenturySkills_Re-ThinkingHowStudentsLearn.pdf

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5

Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2016). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning: From Theory to Practice. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8

Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205

Cronje, J. (2016). Learning technology in higher education. In The Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology (pp. 131–144). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118736494.ch8

Crozat, S., Hu, O., & Trigano, P. (1999). A method for evaluating multimedia learning software. In International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems -Proceedings (Vol. June, pp. 714–719). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MMCS.1999.779287

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (Sixth). Pearson. Retrieved from http://butleratutb.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/54301965/table of contents preface intro.pdf

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(3), 55–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143

Fitriani, U., Adisyahputra, A., & Komala, R. (2018). Eco-friendly website development in biology learning based on project activities on environmental pollution. Biosfer, 11(1), 33–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.11-1.4

Groshans, G., Mikhailova, E., Post, C., Schlautman, M., Carbajales-Dale, P., & Payne, K. (2019). Digital story map learning for STEM disciplines. Education Sciences, 9(2), 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020075

Guleker, R. (2015). Instructional strategies to foster critical thinking: Self-reported practices of the faculty in Albania. International Journal of Teaching and Education, III(4), 6–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2015.3.4.002

Hidayati, N. (2016). Pengembangan petunjuk instruksional kegiatan praktikum materi sistem gerak dan sistem koordinasi pada mata kuliah Anatomi Fisiologi Manusia. Paradigma: Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, Dan Sosial Budaya, 22(2), doi: 119–122. https://doi.org/10.33503/paradigma.v22i2.492

Himschoot, A. R. (2012). Student perception of relevance of biology content to everyday life: A study in higher education biology courses. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Capella University. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/biol_facp/2/

Huff, P. L. (2014). The goal project: A group assignment to encourage creative thinking, leadership abilities and communication skills. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 23(6), 582–594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2014.974198

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935–942. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935

Iriti, J., Bickel, W., Schunn, C., & Stein, M. K. (2016). Maximizing research and development resources: identifying and testing “load-bearing conditions” for educational technology innovations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 245–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9409-2

Irwan, I., Maridi, M., & Dwiastuti, S. (2019). Developing guided inquiry-based ecosystem module to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 51–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7287

Isaacs, S. (2012). Turning on mobile learning in Africa and the Middle East. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning. Paris. doi: https://doi.org/216358

Ismail, N. S., Harun, J., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., & Salleh, S. M. (2017). The effect of mobile problem-based science dictionary application dicscience PBL towards students’ mastery of scientific terms and critical thinking. In 2017 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE) (pp. 69–75). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2017.19

Iversen, A., Pedersen, A. S., Krogh, L., & Jensen, A. A. (2015). Learning, leading, and letting go of control: Learner-led approaches in education. SAGE Open, 5(4), 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015608423

Jack, G. U. (2013). The influence of identified student and school variables on students’ science process skills acquisition. Journal of Education Practice, 4(5), 16–23. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/4783/4862

Kiliç, D., & Saǧlam, N. (2014). Students understanding of genetics concepts: The effect of reasoning ability and learning approaches. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 63–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837402

Korres, K., & Tsami, E. (2013). Supporting the development of critical thinking skills in secondary education through the use of interdisciplinary statistics ’ and mathematics ’ problems. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(5), 491–507. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2010.10700716

Leow, F.-T., & Neo, M. (2014). Interactive multimedia learning: innovating classroom education in a Malaysian University. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 99–110. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v13i2/13211.pdf

Lestari, D. A. B., Astuti, B., & Darsono, T. (2018). Implementasi LKS dengan pendekatan STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 4(2), 202. doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i2.809

Mader, S. S., & Windelspecht, M. (2010). Human biology (12nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://epdf.pub/human-biology-11th-edition6786ec7ea69836f42fb28f57e523091873696.html

Maria, U., Rusilowati, A., & Hardyanto, W. (2019). Interactive multimedia development in the learning process of Indonesian culture introduction theme for 5-6 year old children. Journal of Primary Education, 8(3), 344–353. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v8i3.27029

McCrum, D. P. (2017). Evaluation of creative problem-solving abilities in undergraduate structural engineers through interdisciplinary problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 684–700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1216089

Mehdipour, Y., & Zerehkafi, H. (2013). Mobile learning for education: benefits and challenges. In International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (Vol. 3, pp. 93–100). New Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.ijceronline.com/papers/Vol3_issue6/part%203/P03630930100.pdf

Miharja, F. J., Hindun, I., Fauzi, A., Education, B., Malang, U. M., & Citation, S. (2019). Critical thinking, metacognitive skills, and cognitive learning outcomes: A correlation study in genetic. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 135–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.135-143

Muchlis, L. S., & Putra, F. K. (2017). Development of mobile learning based-interactive multimedia in programming language class at STAIN Batusangkar. Jurnal Ta’Dib, 20(1), 72–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v20i1.673

Nithyanantham, V., Paulmony, R., & Hasan, S. R. (2019). Self-perspective of 21st Century educators: A challenge in the globalised educational world. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 325–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.573869

Nurrohmah, F., Putra, F. G., & Farida, F. (2018). Development of sparkol video scribe assisted learning media. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 8(3), 233–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v8i3.2613

Nusir, S., Alsmadi, I., Al-Kabi, M., & Sharadgah, F. (2013). Studying the impact of using multimedia interactive programs on children’s ability to learn basic math skills. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(3), 305–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.3.305

Oakes, D. J., Hegedus, E. M., Ollerenshaw, S. L., Drury, H., & Ritchie, H. E. (2019). Using the jigsaw method to teach abdominal anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(3), 272–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1802

Pang, C., Lau, J., Seah, C. P., Cheong, L., & Low, A. (2018). Socially challenged collaborative learning of secondary school students in Singapore. Education Sciences, 8(24), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010024

Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Schaap, L., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J., & van Gog, T. (2018). Training self-regulated learning skills with video modeling examples: do task-selection skills transfer? Instructional Science, 46(2), 273–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9434-0

Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Aris, B., Ahmad, M. H., Sejzi, A. A., & Shamsudin, N. A. (2015). E-learning and social media motivation factor model. International Education Studies, 9(1), 20. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n1p20

Rufii, R. (2015). Developing module on constructivist learning strategies to promote students’ independence and performance. International Journal of Education, 7(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v7i1.6675

Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st Century? Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002429/242996E.pdf

Siagian, S., Mursid, M., & Wau, Y. (2014). Development of interactive multimedia learning in learning instructional design. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(32), 44–51. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/16711/17075

Song, D., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838

Suwono, H. (2016). School literary movement in Indonesia: Challenges for scientific literacy. Paper Presented at International Conference on Education, 309–317. Retrieved from http://pasca.um.ac.id/conferences/index.php/ice/article/view/44

Talat, A., & Chaudhry, H. F. (2014). The effect of PBL and 21st century skills on students’ creativity and competitiveness in private schools. The Lahore Journal of Business, 2(2), 89–114. Retrieved from http://www.lahoreschoolofeconomics.edu.pk/businessjournals/V2issue2/05 Talat and Chaudhry FINAL.pdf

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Council for Exceptional. Children, 1920 Association Drive, Reston, Virginia 22091. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf

Thompson, C. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: Process over output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol._1_No._9_Special_Issue_July_2011/1.pdf

Torlakson, T. (2014). Innovate: A blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in California Public Education. Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation. Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation All. Retrieved from https://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ca/sc/documents/innovate.pdf

Tsuneyoshi, R. (2016). Models of schooling in the global age: the case of Japan. Revue Internationale D’education de Sevres, (September), 1–5. Retrieved from http://ries.revues.org/3899

Umachandran, K., Corte, V. Della, Amuthalakshmi, P., Ferdinand-James, D., Said, M. T., Sawicka, B., … Jurcic, I. (2019). Designing learning-skills towards industry 4.0. World Journal on Educational Technology, 11(2), 12–23. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332978312_Designing_learning-skills_towards_industry_40

Valerio, K. M. (2012). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2(1), 30–35. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/jseem/vol2/iss1/6/

Vieira, R. D., Melo, V. F. de, Avraamidou, L., & Lobato, J. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing scientific literacy: The role of students’ epistemological profiles. Education Sciences, 7(4), 47. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020047

Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the deteminants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x

West, D. M. (2015). Connected learning: How mobile technology can imporve education. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, (December), 1–8. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/west_connected-learning_v11.pdf

Yusuf, M. M., Amin, M., & Nugrahaningsih, N. (2017). Developing of instructional media-based animation video on enzyme and metabolism material. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 3(3), 254–257. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi. v3i3.4744

Downloads

Published

2019-11-30

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2019): NOVEMBER

Section

ICT and Learning Media

License

Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.