Peer Review Process

The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed by one reviewer. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process. The language used in this journal is  English. The Editor shall inform you about the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully in 30 to 60 days.

Peer review is designed to assess the contribution, validity, relevance, quality, and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor-quality articles.

From a publisher’s perspective, peer review functions as a filter for content, directing better quality articles to better quality journals and so creating journal brands.

Running articles through the process of peer review adds value to them. For this reason, publishers need to make sure that peer review is robust.

Editor Feedback
"Pointing out the specifics about flaws in the paper’s structure is paramount. Are methods valid, is data clearly presented, and are conclusions supported by data?” (Editor feedback)

“If an editor can read your comments and understand clearly the basis for your recommendation, then you have written a helpful review.” (Editor feedback)