The Violation of Cooperative Principle in Conversational of Presidential Debate Indonesia 2019

Authors

  • Rossy Halimatun Rosyidah Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v1i1.13165

Abstract

Politician will use various style of political languages to influence and convince people to achieve a victory in campaign. Indonesia has conducted debate as a form of campaign in the presidential election. Therefore, violating the cooperative principle in political language often occurs. The researcher conducts this research to know how does the President and Vice President candidates violate cooperative principle, especially in quality and relevance maxim, to know what is the function of the violation, and to know what is the meaning of violation. The method of this research is descriptive qualitative. The subject of this research is the dialogue of President and Vice President candidate in debate. The object of this research is violation of maxim quality and relevance. The instrument of this research is the table indicator. The data obtained from the utterances of President and Vice President candidate. the researcher analyzed the data by using literature study, document study, and content analysis. Then, the validity of data used triangulation method. The result of this study is the President and Vice President candidate number 01 violated maxim relevance and maxim quality. The function of violation are; commisive and assertive. The meaning of the utterances is promising and giving an opinion. Then, the candidate number 02 violated maxim quality with assertive function. The meaning of the utterances is boasting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basra, S. M., & Thoyyibah,. L. (2017). A Speech Act Analysis of Teacher Talk in an EFL Class Room. Intenational Journal Education, 10(1), 73-81. Retrieved on December 7, 2019. From https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ije/article/view/6848/pdf

Carter Nancy, et. al. 2014. The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Oncol Nurs Forum. Retrieved on December 7, 2019. From http://pubmed.ncblnlm.nih.gov/25158659

Fatikhatis, L, S. 2017. “An Ana;yisis Types of Speech Act Used By English Teacher in English Teaching Learning Process at MTS Al-Wahhab Bago Kradenan in Academic Year 2016/2017 (Pragmatic Analysis)”. English Education. IAIN Surakarta. Surakarta.

Grundy, Peter. 2000. Doing Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kiuk, P.Y., & Ghozali I. 2018. Speech Act Analysis in Desmond’s`Conversation in Hacksaw Ridge Movie. Journal JELLT, Vol.2,(1).Jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id. Retrieved on December 7, 2019. From http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/JELLT/article/view/2715

Nordquist, R. 2019. An Introduction to Semantic. Retrieved on December 7, 2019. From http://www.thoughtco.com/semantics-linguistics-1692080.

Pfister, Jonas. 2007. The Metaphysics and the Epistemology of Meaning. Germany: Buch bucher dd ag

Sugiono, 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Trask, R. L. 1994. Language Change. London: Routledge.

Undang – Undang Pilpres tahun 2008

Yule, George. 2006. Pragmatic (edisi terjemahan oleh Indah Fajar Wahyuni dan Rombe Mustajab). Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar

Downloads

Published

2020-08-06

How to Cite

Rosyidah, R. H. (2020). The Violation of Cooperative Principle in Conversational of Presidential Debate Indonesia 2019. English Learning Innovation, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v1i1.13165

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): August

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Rosyidah, R. H.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with English Learning Innovation (englie)  agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in English Learning Innovation (englie), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License” style=

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.