Factors contributing to students’ satisfaction in online learning: A proposed framework for CLIL classes

Authors

  • Khoiriyah Khoiriyah English Language Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, East java, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Firza Thoriq Sholahuddin English Language Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, East java, Indonesia
  • Ananta Benny Dele Bintang English Language Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, East java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v6i1.37256

Keywords:

Student Satisfaction, Online Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulated Learning, Online Interaction, CLIL Classes

Abstract

This research explores the factors contributing to students' satisfaction in online learning, particularly in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classes. Through a literature review, three primary factors were identified as crucial determinants of student satisfaction: online self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and online interaction. Online self-efficacy encompasses students' confidence in their abilities to complete online courses, communicate with peers and instructors, and manage course technologies. Self-regulated learning strategies, such as strategic planning, time management, and help-seeking, positively influence both student satisfaction and academic achievement. The quality and type of online interactions, including teacher-student, student-student, and student-content interactions, significantly impact satisfaction levels. The findings suggest that effective online learning environments should foster student engagement through quality interactions, provide adequate technological support, and promote self-directed learning strategies. The research also highlights the importance of classroom climate and online learning in enhancing student satisfaction. Educational institutions should prioritize enhancing the quality of online interactions, training educators in effective online teaching practices, and expanding technological resources to better meet student needs. Future research should employ mixed methods to gain deeper insights into student experiences and satisfaction, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of online learning dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab Rahman, L., Omar, N., Mohd Fatzel, F. H., & Mohd Isa, N. S. (2022). Predictors of student satisfaction and perceived learning in online distance learning: the effects of self-efficacy and interaction. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i10/14804.

Al-Amin, M., Zubayer, A. Al, Deb, B., & Hasan, M. (2021). Status of tertiary level online class in Bangladesh: students’ response on preparedness, participation and classroom activities. Heliyon, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05943

Aldhahi, M. I., Alqahtani, A. S., Baattaiah, B. A., & Al-Mohammed, H. I. (2022). Exploring the relationship between students’ learning satisfaction and self-efficacy during the emergency transition to remote learning amid the coronavirus pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10644-7

Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1

Alić Topić, A. (2022). Examining students’ interaction and satisfaction with online learning. MAP Education and Humanities, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.53880/2744-2373.2022.2.3.1

Alkodimi, K. A., & Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. (2022). Foreign language literature in the online mode: a quasi-experimental study with college efl learners in saudi arabia. World Journal of English Language, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n7p132

Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562

Amoush, K. H., & Mizher, R. A. (2023). Interaction as a predicator for efl undergraduate university students’ satisfaction with online english language courses. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1304.14

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2020.73.285.292

Basereh, N., & Pishkar, K. (2016). Self-directed learning and self-efficacy belief among iranian efl learners at the advanced level of language proficiency. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(1). www.jallr.com

Bećirović, S., Ahmetović, E., & Skopljak, A. (2022). An examination of students online learning satisfaction, interaction, self-efficacy and self-regulated learning. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2022.1.16

Bodnar, S., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2016). Evaluating the motivational impact of CALL systems: current practices and future directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.927365

Brown, M., Hoon, A. E., Edwards, M., Shabu, S., Okoronkwo, I., & Newton, P. M. (2023). A pragmatic evaluation of university student experience of remote digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on lessons learned for future practice. PLoS ONE, 18(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283742

Çakmakkaya, Ö. S., Meydanlı, E. G., Kafadar, A. M., Demirci, M. S., Süzer, Ö., Ar, M. C., Yaman, M. O., Demirbaş, K. C., & Gönen, M. S. (2024). Factors affecting medical students’ satisfaction with online learning: a regression analysis of a survey. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04995-7

Cao, X. T. (2022). Factors affecting students’ perceived outcomes and satisfaction in virtual classrooms. Vietnam Journal of Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2022.167

Cheng, X., Bao, Y., Yang, B., Chen, S., Zuo, Y., & Siponen, M. (2023). Investigating students’ satisfaction with online collaborative learning during the covid-19 period: an expectation-confirmation model. Group Decision and Negotiation, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09829-x

Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three-year study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=8CEenwEACAAJ

de la Fuente, J., Sander, P., Kauffman, D. F., & Soylu, M. Y. (2020). Differential effects of self- vs. External-regulation on learning approaches, academic achievement, and satisfaction in undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.543884

Dewi, P. R. (2021). The implementation of online learning in efl classroom: its opportunities and drawbacks perceived by teachers and students. JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia), 6(3). https://doi.org/10.29210/021120jpgi0005

Dinh, C. T., & Phuong, H. Y. (2024). Examining student characteristics, self-regulated learning strategies, and their perceived effects on satisfaction and academic performance in MOOCs. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(8), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.8.3446

Dinh, T. C., & Nguyen, P. B. N. (2022). Impact of internet self-efficacy and self-regulated learning on satisfaction and academic achievement in online learning: a case study in vietnam. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(16). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i16.33819

Dong, X., Yuan, H., Xue, H., Li, Y., Jia, L., Chen, J., Shi, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024). Factors influencing college students’ self-regulated learning in online learning environment: A systematic review. In Nurse Education Today (Vol. 133). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106071

Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090

Eom, S. (2019). The effects of student motivation and self-regulated learning strategies on student’s perceived e-learning outcomes and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v19i7.2529

Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: an update*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12097

Estelami, H. (2012). An exploratory study of the drivers of student satisfaction and learning experience in hybrid-online and purely online marketing courses. Marketing Education Review, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.2753/mer1052-8008220204

Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper Fifth edition. Sage publications.

Gachigi, D. P. N., Ngunu, D. S., Okoth, E., & Alulu, L. (2023). Predictors of students’ satisfaction in online learning. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VII(VIII). https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2023.7929

Giray, G. (2021). An assessment of student satisfaction with e-learning: An empirical study with computer and software engineering undergraduate students in Turkey under pandemic conditions. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10454-x

Haghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2019). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ appropriate use of refusal: achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083

Herrador-Alcaide, T. C., Hernández-Solís, M., & Sanguino Galván, R. (2019). Feelings of satisfaction in mature students of financial accounting in a virtual learning environment: an experience of measurement in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0148-z

Hettiarachchi, S., Damayanthi, B. W. R., Heenkenda, S., Dissanayake, D. M. S. L. B., Ranagalage, M., & Ananda, L. (2021). Student satisfaction with online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study at state universities in Sri Lanka. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111749

Irfan, M., Kusumaningrum, B., Yulia, Y., & Widodo, S. A. (2020). Challenges during the pandemic: use of e-learning in mathematics learning in higher education. Infinity Journal, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p147-158

Islam, M. R., Sarker, R., Sultana, R., Faisal-E-Alam, M., Castanho, R. A., & Meyer, D. (2023). Understanding the covid-19 pandemic’s impact on e-learner satisfaction at the tertiary level. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086694

Keržič, D., Alex, J. K., Alvarado, R. P. B., da Silva Bezerra, D., Cheraghi, M., Dobrowolska, B., Fagbamigbe, A. F., Faris, M. A. I. E., França, T., González-Fernández, B., Gonzalez-Robledo, L. M., Inasius, F., Kar, S. K., Lazányi, K., Lazăr, F., Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D., Marôco, J., Marques, B. P., Mejía-Rodríguez, O., … Aristovnik, A. (2021). Academic student satisfaction and perceived performance in the e-learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence across ten countries. PLoS ONE, 16(10 October 2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258807

Kim, S. H., & Park, S. (2023). What contributed to students’ online learning satisfaction during the pandemic? Distance Education, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2150147

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001

Lei, S. I., & So, A. S. I. (2021). Online teaching and learning experiences during the covid-19 pandemic–a comparison of teacher and student perceptions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1907196

Lim, S. L., & Yeo, K. J. (2019). Students’ perceived learning environment for self regulation. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.00919.7

Lin, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). Unpacking the mediating role of classroom interaction between student satisfaction and perceived online learning among Chinese EFL tertiary learners in the new normal of post-COVID-19. Acta Psychologica, 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104233

Lin, Y. M., Lin, G. Y., & Laffey, J. M. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.1.a

Marmon, M., Vanscoder, J., & Gordesky, J. (2014). Online student satisfaction: An examination of preference, asynchronous course elements and collaboration among online students. Current Issues in Education, 17(3). Retrieved from https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1280

Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford: Macmillan Education, 2008.

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

Nia, H. S., Marôco, J., She, L., Fomani, F. K., Rahmatpour, P., Ilic, I. S., Ibrahim, M. M., Ibrahim, F. M., Narula, S., & Esposito, G. (2023). Student satisfaction and academic efficacy during online learning with the mediating effect of student engagement: A multi-country study. Plos One, 18(10), e0285315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285315

ÖZIŞIK, B. Z. (2021). Adaptation to emergency online education: a case of oral communication skills course in elt. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31805/acjes.937851

Palmer, S. R., & Holt, D. M. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00294.x

Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018). Online education: worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications. In Journal of Global Information Technology Management (Vol. 21, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262

Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1

Reguera, E. A. M., & Lopez, M. (2021). Using a digital whiteboard for student engagement in distance education. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107268

Roff, K. A. (2018). Student satisfaction and/or dissatisfaction in blended learning environments. Frontiers in Education Technology, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22158/fet.v1n2p149

Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001

Shih, H.-F., Chen, S.-H. E., Chen, S.-C., & Wey, S.-C. (2013). The relationship among tertiary level efl students’ personality, online learning motivation and online learning satisfaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.442

Shin, H. W., & Sok, S. (2023). Student satisfaction and perceived learning in an online second language learning environment: A replication of Gray and DiLoreto (2016). ReCALL, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000034

Teng, M. F., Wang, C., & Wu, J. G. (2023). Metacognitive strategies, language learning motivation, self-efficacy belief, and english achievement during remote learning: a structural equation modelling approach. RELC Journal, 54(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211040268

Thanh, L. P., Trang, T. N. Q., Minh, N. N., & Van Hai, H. (2024). Key determinants of student satisfaction in online learning during covid-19: evidence from vietnamese students. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024(1), 5560967. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5560967

Tilak, S., Glassman, M., Peri, J., Xu, M., Kuznetcova, I., & Gao, L. (2022). Need satisfaction and collective efficacy in undergraduate blog-driven classes: A structural equation modelling approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7963

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Emergency remote education experiment amid COVID-19 pandemic. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5113

Wang, X., Hassan, A. Bin, Shwu Pyng, H., Ye, H., & Aminuddin, A. A. (2024). The impact of perceived quality of online interaction on satisfaction of international student interactions in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2293454

Wen, L., Xu, W., Yan, X., Lin, X., Shao, C., & Zhang, L. (2024). An interaction study of online learning satisfaction with parent-child relationships and trait coping styles. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1320886

Wu, Y., Xu, X., Xue, J., & Hu, P. (2023). A cross-group comparison study of the effect of interaction on satisfaction in online learning: The parallel mediating role of academic emotions and self-regulated learning. Computers and Education, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104776

Zhang, Y., Huang, J., Hussain, S., & Dong, Y. (2023). Investigating the impact of the community of inquiry presence on online learning satisfaction: a chinese college student perspective. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S409229

Downloads

Published

2024-11-26

How to Cite

Khoiriyah, K., Sholahuddin, M. F. T., & Bintang, A. B. D. (2024). Factors contributing to students’ satisfaction in online learning: A proposed framework for CLIL classes. English Learning Innovation (englie), 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v6i1.37256

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): February

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Khoiriyah, K. et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with English Learning Innovation (englie)  agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in English Learning Innovation (englie), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License” style=

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.