Mobile learning student worksheet based on socio-scientific-issues: Enhancing students’ scientific literacy skills in biology

Authors

  • Aga Arizen Biology Education, Graduate Program, Yogyakarta State University, Colombo Street No 1, Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta
  • S. Suhartini Biology Education, Graduate Program, Yogyakarta State University, Colombo Street No 1, Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.11196

Keywords:

mobile learning, scientific literacy, socio-scientific-issues, student worksheet

Abstract

The 21st-century science and technology rapid development requires suitable educational tools to meet the expected learning outcomes desired. This study aimed at producing a mobile learning student worksheet based on Socio-Scientific-Issues (SSI) which is feasible to use in biology teaching activity as well as finding out its effectiveness in enhancing students' scientific literacy skills. This study research and development (R&D) used the ADDIE model. The effectiveness test of mobile learning student worksheet in enhancing students’ scientific literacy skills was done by using a one-group pretest-posttest design. The research findings indicated that the developed mobile learning student worksheet based on SSI is feasible to use in biology teaching activity and become the considerable tool in enhancing students’ scientific literacy skills based on the n-gain score of 0.75 (high category). Thus, it is suggested for science teachers, particularly biology teachers, to adopt this tool to support the learning activity they conduct.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aga Arizen, Biology Education, Graduate Program, Yogyakarta State University, Colombo Street No 1, Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta

S. Suhartini, Biology Education, Graduate Program, Yogyakarta State University, Colombo Street No 1, Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta

References

Ardianto, A. D., & Priyono, B. (2014). Penerapan pembelajaran dengan praktikum pembuatan kompos terhadap karakter dan hasil belajar siswa. Unnes Journal of Biology Education, 3(3), 355–363. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe/article/view/4536

Darmodjo, H., & Kaligis, J. R. E. (1992). Pendidikan IPA 2. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Retrieved from http://library.fip.uny.ac.id/opac/index.php?p=show_detail&id=6604

Dewi, I. N., Ibrahim, M., Poedjiastoeti, S., Prahani, B. K., Setiawan, D., & Sumarjan, S. (2019). Effectiveness of local wisdom integrated (LWI) learning model to improve scientific communication skills of junior high school students in science learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. doi: http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022014

Dewi, I. N., Poedjiastoeti, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2017). ELSII learning model based local wisdom to improve students’ problem solving skills and scientific communication. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(1), 107–118. Retrieved from https://www.ijern.com/journal/2017/January-2017/09.pdf

Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. (2010). Juknis penyusunan perangkat penilaian afektif di SMA. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. Retrieved from http://regulasi.sman1jember.sch.id/Peraturan Pemerintah & Menteri/Petunjuk Teknis dan Pedoman/31. Juknis Penilaian Afektif__ISI-Revisi__1111.pdf

Dwianto, A., Wilujeng, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2017). The development of science domain based learning tool which is integrated with local wisdom to improve science process skill and scientific attitude. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. doi: http://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7205

Ghani, I. B. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Yahaya, N. A., & Surif, J. (2017). Enhancing students’ HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 849–874. doi: http://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00120g

Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Bloomington, USA: American Educational Research Association’s Division D, Measurement and Research Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf

Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., Kangas, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2015). Sociocultural perspectives on collaborative learning. The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning. London: Routledge. doi: http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837290.ch3

Heong, Y. M., Yunos, J. M., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Tee, T. K., & Mohamad, M. M. (2012). The needs analysis of learning higher order thinking skills for generating ideas. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (59), 197–203. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.265

Huang, Y. M., Liao, Y. W., Huang, S. H., & Chen, H. C. (2013). A jigsaw-based cooperative learning approach to improve learning outcomes for mobile situated learning. Educational Technology and Society, 17(1), 128–140. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.1.128?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers and Education, 56(4), 1023–1031. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002

Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. (2016). STEM virtual lab: an alternative practical media to enhance student’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239–246. doi: http://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5492

Kemendikbud, T. G. (2017). Panduan gerakan literasi nasional. (L. A. Myani, Ed.). Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Retrieved from https://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/panduan-gln.pdf

Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1). doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84

Lin, S., Lin, H., Lee, L., & Yore, L. D. (2014). Are science comics a good medium for science communication? The case for public learning of nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, (May 2015), 37–41. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.941040

Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, C. H., Jian, P. H., & Liou, P. Y. (2012). The dynamics of motivation and learning strategy in a creativity-supporting learning environment in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 172–180. Retrieved from http://tojet.net/articles/v11i1/11116.pdf

Mehdipour, Y., & Zerehkafi, H. (2013). Mobile learning for education: benefits and challenges. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 3(6), 93–101. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.604802

Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Schellens, T., & De Marez, L. (2015). Teaching and learning with mobile technology: A qualitative explorative study about the introduction of tablet devices in secondary education. PLoS ONE, 10(12), 1–17. doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144008

Nuangchalerm, P. (2010). Engaging students to perceive nature of science through Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 34–37. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508531.pdf

OECD. (2015). OECD Economic surveys: Brazil November 2015. Oecd. doi: http://doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-jpn-2009-en

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 insight and interpretations. OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations FINAL PDF.pdf

Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Johnson, D. M., Witzig, S. B., Izci, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues based education. Science Educator, 22(1). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062183.pdf

Rohmawati, E., Widodo, W., & Agustini, R. (2018). Membangun kemampuan literasi sains siswa melalui pembelajaran berkonteks Socio-Scientific Issues berbantuan media weblog. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 3(1). doi: http://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v3n1.p8-14

Rundgren, Chang, S.-N., Rundgren, & Johan, C. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socio-scientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–24. Retrieved from http://journaldatabase.info/articles/see-sep_from_separate_holistic_view.html

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4–27.doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101

Wishart, J. (2015). Assimilate or accommodate? The need to rethink current use of the term “Mobile learning.” In IThe Mobile Learning Voyage - From Small Ripples to Massive Open Waters (pp. 229–238). Springer, Cham. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_17

Yuen Fook, C., & Nazamud-Din, A. (2017). Strategies to enhance assignment and feedback practices in the 21st century classroom: a case study. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 25, 155–166. Retrieved from http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/Pertanika PAPERS/JSSH Vol. 25 (S) Jan. 2017/15 JSSH(S)-0316-2016-4thProof.pdf

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2008). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. JRST, 46(1), 74–101. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

Issue

Section

ICT, Learning Media, and Learning Resources