The correlation between learning styles and biology learning performance of Nigerian students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.11206Keywords:
biology senior secondary school, learning style, students’ performanceAbstract
Learning style has been considered as one of determining factors for learning processes. This study aimed at observing the correlation between students’ learning style and performance of Nigerian students in biology. The sample of this study consisted of 100 students which were randomly selected from the secondary schools in Ifelodun LGA, Kwara State, Nigeria. The two validated instrument used for data collection were Grasha & Reichmann’s Student Learning Scale and VAK/VARK Learning Style. The data gained were analyzed using percentage, Pearson correlation, and Chi-Square test. The study findings indicated that: (i) there was a negative correlation between students’ academic performance and visual (-0.061) and kinesthetic learning style (-0.50), as well as positive correlation between the performance and auditory learning style (0.108). (ii) There were no significant differences between the study of learning styles, either visual (t(99) = 1.60, p = 0.11), auditory (t(99) = 1.33, p = 0.18), or kinesthetic (t(99) = 0.59, p = 0.55), of male and female biology students’ performance. Thus, it is suggested that teachers choose the most proper learning methods which accommodate the students’ need based on their learning styles.
Downloads
References
Adesoji, F. A., & Olatunbosun, S. (2008). Student, teacher and school environment factors as determinants of achievement in senior secondary school chemistry. The Journal of Inetrnational Social Research, 1(2), 13–34. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt1/sayi2/sayi2pdf/Adesoji_and_Olatunbosun.pdf
Alfonseca, E., Carro, R. M., Martín, E., Ortigosa, A., & Paredes, P. (2006). The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: A case study. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16(3-4), 377–401. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-006-9012-7
Alon, S., & Diprete, T. A. (2015). Gender differences in the formation of a field of study choice set. Sociological Science, 2(February), 50–81. doi: http://doi.org/10.15195/v2.a5
Buch, K., & Bartley, S. (2002). Learning style and training delivery mode preference. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(1), 5–10. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/13665620210412795
Eren, C. D., Bayrak, B. K., & Benzer, E. (2015). The examination of primary school students’ attitudes toward science course and experiments in terms of some variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1006–1014. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1245
Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1–19. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00125.x
Klement, M. (2014). How do my students study? An analysis of students’ of educational disciplines favorite learning styles according to VARK classification. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 384–390. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.326
Kumari, S. N., & Saraladevi, K. (2014). Gender differences in attitude towards science teaching and learning styles among adolescents. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN, 3(10), 50–58. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i10/T0NUMTQ1MQ==.pdf
Meyers-Levy, J., & Loken, B. (2015). Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 129–149. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCPS.2014.06.003
Michael, M. C. (2012). Essential biology for senior secondary school. Lagos, Nigeria: Tonad Publishers Limited. Retrieved from https://olist.ng/books-games/Essential-Biology-for-senior-secondary-school-by-M-39118161707009.html?city_name=Nigeria
Ojeh, N., Sobers-Grannum, N., Gaur, U., Udupa, A., & Majumder, M. A. A. (2017). Learning style preferences: A study of pre-clinical medical students in Barbados. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5(4), 185–194. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979913
Omar, N., Mohamad, M. M., & Paimin, A. N. (2015). Dimension of Learning Styles and Students’ Academic Achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 172–182. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.130
Omorogbe, E. and Ewansiha, J. (2013). The challenge of Effective Science Teaching in Nigerian Secondary schools. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(7), 181–188. doi: http://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n7p181
Osagie, R. O., & Alutu, A. N. (2016). Factors affecting gender equity in the choice of science and technology careers among secondary school students in Edo State, Nigeria. International Education Studies, 9(10), 231–236. doi: http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n10p231
Papadatou-Pastou, M., Gritzali, M., & Barrable, A. (2018). The learning styles educational neuromyth: Lack of agreement between teachers’ judgments, self-assessment, and students' intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 3(November), 1–5. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00105
Reddy, L. (2017). Gender differences in attitudes to learning science in grade 7. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), 26–36. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1279450
Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2020). Providing instruction based on students’ learning style preferences does not improve learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(February), 1–7. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00164
Saido, G. M., Siraj, S., Nordin, A. B. Bin, & Amedy, O. S. A. (2015). Higher order thinking skills among secondary school students in science learning. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3), 13–20. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i10/T0NUMTQ1MQ==.pdf
Salter, D. W., Evans, N. J., & Forney, D. S. (2006). A longitudinal study of learning style preferences on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Learning Style Inventory. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 173–184. doi: http://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0022
Steigerwald, J. (2019). The science of biology. In Experimenting at the Boundaries of Life (pp. 323–390). University of Pittsburgh Press.doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk8w1cn.11
Sweeney, B., & Costello, F. (2009). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making: An empirical examination of undergraduate accounting and business students. Accounting Education, 18(1), 75–97. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/09639280802009454
Syofyan, R., & Siwi, M. K. (2018). The impact of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles on economics education teaching. Advances in Ecinomics, Bussiness and Management Research, 57, 642–649. doi: http://doi.org/10.2991/piceeba-18.2018.17
van der Vleuten, M., Jaspers, E., Maas, I., & van der Lippe, T. (2016). Boys’ and girls’ educational choices in secondary education. The role of gender ideology. Educational Studies, 42(2), 181–200. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1160821
Veloo, A., Perumal, S., & Vikneswary, R. (2013). Inquiri-based instruction, students’ attitudes and teachers' support towards science achievement in rural primary schools. In F. Odabasi (Ed.), Procedia (pp. 65–69). Elsevier Ltd. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.153
Yamtinah, S., Masykuri, M., & Syahidul Shidiq, A. (2017). Gender differences in student’s attitudes toward science: an analysis of students' science process skill testlet instrument. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 4, pp. 030003–1–030003–6). New York: American Institute of Physics. doi: http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995086
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.