Interactive multimedia: Enhacing students’ cognitive learning and creative thinking skill in Arthropod material

Authors

  • Ubung Darmawan Biology Education Study Program, University of Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No. 67, West Java 45512
  • Sri Redjeki Biology Education Study Program, University of Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No. 67, West Java 45512 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7301-8744
  • W. Widhorini Biology Education Study Program, University of Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No. 67, West Java 45512

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11370

Keywords:

Arthropod, cognitive learning, creative thingking skill, interactive multimedia

Abstract

Interactive multimedia based on Adobe Director, as a learning medium, is important in optimizing students’ learning outcomes. This study aimed to develop interactive multimedia in Arthropod topic as a learning media based on Adobe Director in optimizing students’ cognitive learning outcomes as well as their creative thinking skills. This Research and Development (R & D) adopted Lee and Owens model. The validity of the media developed was assessed by material and media experts. The product trial was done by involving ten of X graders. The students' cognitive learning outcomes and creative thinking skills were measured using pretest and posttest. The data obtained were then analyzed using N-gain calculation. The results showed that the interactive multimedia based on Adobe Director was categorized as feasible (based on material expert) and very feasible (based on media expert). The N-gain scores of cognitive learning outcomes of C1, C2, C3, C4 were 0.70, 0.75, 0.71, and 0.56 respectively. Moreover, the N-gain scores of creative thinking skills were 0.55 (widening), 0.43 (connecting), and 0.73 (reorganizing). It can be concluded that the interactive multimedia based on Adobe Director developed is feasible and able to improve cognitive learning outcomes and students' creative thinking skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ubung Darmawan, Biology Education Study Program, University of Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No. 67, West Java 45512

Sri Redjeki, Biology Education Study Program, University of Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No. 67, West Java 45512

W. Widhorini, Biology Education Study Program, University of Kuningan, Jl. Pramuka No. 67, West Java 45512

References

Agius, H. W., & Angelides, M. C. (2000). A method for developing interactive multimedia from their semantic content. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 34(2), 165–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-023X(00)0 0014-8

Akpinar, E. (2014). The use of interactive computer animations based on poe as a presentation tool in primary science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 527–537. doi: https://doi.org/10.10 07/s10956-013-9482-4

Angelides, M. C., & Agius, H. W. (2002). An interactive multimedia learning environment for vlsi built with cosmos. Computers & Education, 39(2), 145–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00028-3

Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computers & Education, 56(3), 839–846. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu .2010.10.025

Bayraktar, D. M., Cosgun, V., & Altan, T. (2019). Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: a systematic review. Computers & Education, 141, 103618. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103618

Dervic, D., Dapo, N., Mesic, V., & Dokic, R. (2019). Cognitive load in multimedia learning: an example from teaching about lenses. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 5(1), 102-118. doi: https://doi.or g/10.21891/jeseh.481698

Djamas, D., Tinedi, V., & Yohandri, Y. (2018). Development of interactive multimedia learning materials for improving critical thinking skills. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 14(4), 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2018100105

Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: an integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024–1033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003

Gould, S. M., & Anderson, J. (2002). Economic analysis of bilingual interactive multimedia nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34(5), 273–278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(0 6)60106-1

Gu, X., Dijksterhuis, A., & Ritter, S. M. (2019). Fostering children’s creative thinking skills with the 5-I training program. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 32, 92–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.002

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Herayanti, L., & Husein, S. (2019). Problem-based learning approach with supported interactive multimedia in physics course: its effects on critical thinking disposition. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1075–1089. doi: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.627162

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Sutrio, S. (2014). Penggunaan multimedia interaktif dalam pembelajaran fisika dan implikasinya pada penguasaan konsep mahasiswa. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 9(1), 15–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v9i1.38

Hidayat, T., Susilaningsih, E., & Kurniawan, C. (2018). The effectiveness of enrichment test instruments design to measure students’ creative thinking skills and problem-solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 161–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.011

Huang, C. (2005). Designing high-quality interactive multimedia learning modules. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 29(2), 223–233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.017

Huang, N., Chang, Y., & Chou, C. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tsc.2020.100695

Jantz, C., Anderson, J., & Gould, S. M. (2002). Using computer-based assessments to evaluate interactive multimedia nutrition education among low-income predominantly hispanic participants. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34(5), 252–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60103-6

Klerk, S. D., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2016). A methodology for applying students’ interactive task performance scores from a multimedia-based performance assessment in a bayesian network. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 264–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.071

Kuk, K., Milentijevic, I., Rancic, D., & Spalevic, P. (2012). Pedagogical agent in multimedia interactive modules for learning – mimle. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8051–8058. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.138

Lee, W. W., & Owens, D. L. (2004). Multimedia-Based Instructional design. In R. Taff (Ed.), Pfeiffer (2nd ed.). Wiley. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3lKveKF

Low, A. L. Y., Low, K. L. T., & Koo, V. C. (2003). Multimedia learning systems: a future interactive educational tool. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 25–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00160 -4

Markousis, T., Tsirikos, D., Vazirgiannis, M., & Stavrakas, Y. (2000). Www-enabled delivery of interactive multimedia documents. Computer Communications, 23(3), 242–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-3664(99)00178-4

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: a possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215

Oberholzer, C., & Hurni, L. (2000). Visualization of change in the interactive multimedia atlas of switzerland. Computers & Geosciences, 26(1), 37–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00031-X

Perry, A., & Karpova, E. (2017). Efficacy of teaching creative thinking skills: a comparison of multiple creativity assessments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 118–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.017

Rasch, T., & Schnotz, W. (2009). Interactive and non-interactive pictures in multimedia learning environments: effects on learning outcomes and learning efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 411–422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.008

Schmid, E. C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the english language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553–1568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.005

Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2014). Click versus drag: user-performed tasks and the enactment effect in an interactive multimedia ebnvironment. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 242–255. doi: https://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.chb.2014.01.012

Sukarjo. (2006). Kumpulan materi evaluasi pembelajaran. PPS UNY. Retrieved from http://library.pps.uny.ac.id/opac/inde x.php?p=show_detail&id=6607

Vagg, T., Balta, J. Y., Bolger, A., & Lone, M. (2020). Multimedia in education: what do the students think. Health Professions Education, 6(3), 325–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.04.011

Vazquez, F. L., Torres, A. J., Otero, P., Blanco, V., Lopez, L., Casal, A. G., & Arrojo, M. (2019). Cognitive-behavioral intervention via interactive multimedia online video game for active aging: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 20, 692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3859-5

Downloads

Published

2020-07-21

Issue

Section

ICT and Learning Media