Developing guided inquiry module in animal reproductive system material

Authors

  • Nosi Qadariah Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl Semarang No.5 Malang, East Java 65145
  • Sri Rahayu Lestari Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl Semarang No.5 Malang, East Java 65145 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2208-4156
  • Fatchur Rohman Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl Semarang No.5 Malang, East Java 65145 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-0892

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.12207

Keywords:

animal reproductive system, cognitive learning outcomes, guided inquiry module, science process skills

Abstract

Guided inquiry module is one of alternative to improve students’ science process skills and cognitive learning outcomes. The aim of this research was to produce guided inquiry module in animal reproductive system material as well as improving student science process skills and cognitive learning outcomes. The research used ADDIE development model which consists of the following stages: analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluation. The research instruments for collecting the data included material and media expert validation sheets, field practitioner questionnaire, module practicality questionnaire, pretest and posttest question sheets (used to measure science process skills and cognitive learning outcomes). The data analysis technique used were quantitative and qualitative descriptions as well as quade's rank analysis of covariance. The results of content and media expert validations were 94.84%  and 92.43%  respectively. In addition, the field practitioner response reached 95.7% and the module practicality value was 91.3%. Furthermore, the module has significantly improved students’ science process skills [F(1,78) = 42.509, p < 0.05] and  cognitive learning outcome  [F(1,78) = 7.480, p < 0.05]. Hence, the module is recommended to be implemented in delivering animal reproductive system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nosi Qadariah, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl Semarang No.5 Malang, East Java 65145

Sri Rahayu Lestari, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl Semarang No.5 Malang, East Java 65145

Fatchur Rohman, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl Semarang No.5 Malang, East Java 65145

References

Acar, O. (2014). Scientific reasoning, conceptual knowledge, & achievement differences between prospective science teachers having a consistent misconception and those having a scientific conception in an argumentation-based guided inquiry course. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 148–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.002

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran. Retrieved from https://rosda.co.id/pendidikan-keguruan/378-instrumen-perangkat-pembelajaran.html%0Ahttps://bit.ly/35ofYNZ%0A

Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the clasification of educational goal: handbook 1 cognitive domain. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/35hhvp1

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: the ADDIE approach. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Buck, G. A., Latta, M. A. M., & Pelecky, D. L. (2007). Learning how to make inquiry into electricity and magnetism discernible to middle level teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(3), 377–397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9053-8

Cho, M.-H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. H. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001

Conn, C. A., Bohan, K. J., Pieperc, S. L., & Musumeci, M. (2020). Validity inquiry process: practical guidance for examining performance assessments and building a validity argument. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100843

Curtis, E., Brownlee, J., & Spooner-Lane, R. (2020). Teaching perspectives of philosophical inquiry: changes to secondary teachers’ understanding of student learning and pedagogical practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100711

Donohoe, A. (2019). The blended reflective inquiry educators framework; origins, development and utilisation. Nurse Education in Practice, 38, 96–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.06.008

Ekici, M., & Erdem, M. (2020). Developing science process skills through mobile scientific inquiry. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100658

Elfeky, A. I. M., Masadeh, T. S. Y., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100622

Faot, M. M., Zubaidah, S., & Kuswantoro, H. (2016). Pengembangan modul teknik budidaya tanaman kedelai sebagai bahan ajar sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan, 1(7), 1421–1426. doi: https://doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i7.6587

Graaf, J., Segers, E., & Jong, T. (2020). Fostering integration of informational texts and virtual labs during inquiry-based learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsy ch.2020.101890

Gultepe, N. (2016). High school science teachers’ views on science process skills. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(5), 779–800. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.348a

Kefi, S., & Uslu, M. (2015). The effects of supportive scientific activities education program on pre-school teachers’ usage levels of basic scientific process skills. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 23(11), 2619–2626. doi: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2015.23.11.22389

Kovanovic, V., Gasevic, D., Joksimovic, S., Hatala, M., & Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Practical research: planning and design, 11th edition. Retrieved from https://pcefet.com/common/library/books/51/2590_[Paul_D._Leedy,_Jeanne_Ellis_Ormrod]_Practical_ Res(b-ok.org).pdf

Llewellyn, D. J. (2013). Teaching high school science through inquiry and argumentation. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bks4DQAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

Mahfudhillah, H. T., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., & Sueb, S. (2017). Pengembangan modul kawasan rumah pangan lestari (KRPL) berbasis proyek untuk siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan, 2(3), 400–408. doi: https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i3.8655

Mamun, M. A. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695

Martin, D. J., Sigur, R. J., & Schmidt, E. (2005). Process-oriented inquiry-a constructivist aproach to early childhood science education: teaching teacher to do science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(2), 13–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174678

Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum yang disempurnakan: pengembangan standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar. Retrieved from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=40139#

Newton, X. A., & Tonelli, E. P. (2020). Building undergraduate stem majors’ capacity for delivering inquiry-based mathematics and science lessons: an exploratory evaluation study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100833

Ozgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283–292. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2 012.846a

Pambudiono, A., Suarsini, E., & Amin, M. (2016). Pengembangan buku ajar bioteknologi berbasis penelitian bioremidiasi logam berat kadmium untuk mahasiswa s1 biologi universitas negeri malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan., 1(6), 1077–1085. doi: https://doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i6. 6389

Pantiwati, Y., Permana, F. H., & Kusniarti, T. (2020). The relationship between capability dimension and cognitive dimension ability of grade vii middle school students. The 3rd International Conference On Mathematics And Science Education (ICOMSE) 2019: Strengthening Mathematics and Science Education Research for the Challenge of Global Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000556

Pantiwati, Y., Permana, F. H., Kusniarti, T., & Miharja, F. J. (2020). The characteristics of literacy management in school literacy movement (SLM) at junior high school in malang – indonesia. Asian Social Science, 16(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v16n4p15

Parmin, P., & Peniati, E. (2012). Pengembangan modul mata kuliah strategi belajar mengajar IPA berbasis hasil penelitian pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 1(1), 8–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v1i1.2006

Post, L. S., Guo, P., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Effects of remote labs on cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in higher education. Computers & Education, 140. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103596

Qadariah, N., Lestari, S. R., & Rohman, F. (2019). Modul berbasis inkuiri terbimbing berdasarkan hasil penelitian pada materi sistem rerproduksi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan., 4(5), 634–639. doi: https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i5.12426

Qadariah, N., Lestari, S. R., & Rohman, F. (2020). Single bulb garlic (Allium sativum) extract improve sperm quality in hyperlipidemia male mice model. Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan, 14(1), 7–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.21157/j.ked.hewan.v14i1.13562

Seeley, R. R., Tate, P., & Stephens, T. D. (2008). Anatomy & physiology. Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/11441222/version/39028821

Susongko, P. (2010). Perbandingan keefektifan bentuk tes uraian dan teslet dengan penerapan graded response model (GRM). Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(2), 269–288. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.21831/pep.v14i2.1082

Tasir, Z., & Pin, O. C. (2012). Trainee teachers’ mental effort in learning spreadsheet through self-instructional module based on cognitive load theory. Computers & Education, 59(2), 449–465. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.009

Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003

Ucar, S., & Trundle, K. C. (2011). Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1571–1582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2011.02.007

Uiterwijk-Luijk, L., Kruger, M., Zijlstra, B., & Volman, M. (2019). Teachers’ role in stimulating students’ inquiry habit of mind in primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.tate.2019.102894

Warin, B., Kolski, C., & Sagar, M. (2011). Framework for the evolution of acquiring knowledge modules to integrate the acquisition of high-level cognitive skills and professional competencies: principles and case studies. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1595–1614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2011.02.013

Zhang, L. (2019). “Hands-on” plus “inquiry”? effects of withholding answers coupled with physical manipulations on students’ learning of energy-related science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 60, 199–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.001

Downloads

Published

2020-07-21

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): JULY

Section

ICT, Learning Media, and Learning Resources

License

Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.