Vocational students’ HOTS and HOTSEP overview in developing ITA learning model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i3.16392Keywords:
HOTS, HOTSEP, ITA learning model, Vocational studentsAbstract
Practical learning activities carried out in remote situations during the COVID-19 pandemic triggered vocational students to take advantage of the surrounding environment as a learning resource. The process also determines how their HOTS and HOTSEP are. A learning model that can accommodate the skills is needed, such as ITA (Identify problems–Think and write–Analysis and argumentation) model. This learning model utilizes environmental issues intending to guide students to understand the environment through an online platform. This study aimed to analyze the HOTS and HOTSEP of vocational students, as the basis for developing a new learning model. The research sample consisted of 61 students with 29 male students and 32 female students. The sample was selected by simple random sampling. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results showed that the total scores of students' HOTS (17.14) and HOTSEP (18.74) were suggested as very low categories. Thus, the students' skills need to improve actively with innovative learning models, such as the application of the ITA model.
Downloads
References
Abidinsyah, A., Ramdiah, S., & Royani, M. (2019). The implementation of local wisdom-based learning and HOTS-based assessment: Teacher survey in Banjarmasin. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(3), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.9910
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airiasian, W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/A_taxonomy_for_ learning_teaching_and_ass.html?id=EMQlAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Belecina, R. R., & Ocampo, J. M. (2018). Effecting change on students’ critical thinking in problem solving. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, 10(102), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.2121/ edu-ijes.v10i2.949
Börner, D., Kalz, M., & Specht, M. (2015). It doesn’t matter, but: Examining the impact of ambient learning displays on energy consumption and conservation at the workplace. Environmental Education Research, 21(6), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.921804
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10. 1080/02619768.2020.1821184
Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
Chen, C. H., & Chou, M. H. (2015). Enhancing middle school students’ scientific learning and motivation through agent-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(5), 481–492. https://doi.org /10.1111/jcal.12094
Chouhan, S., Bhatnagar, B., Suman, & Kaur, M. (2017). Assessment of environmental attitude of adolescent of Bikaner City. Studies on Home and Community Science, 11(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737 189.2017.1336308
Cutri, R. M., Mena, J., & Whiting, E. F. (2020). Faculty readiness for online crisis teaching: Transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1815702
Demiral, U. (2018). Examination of critical thinking skills of preservice science teachers: A perspective of social constructivist theory. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 179. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel. v7n4p179
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Fajarianingtyas, D. A., Akbar, N. A., & Herowati, H. (2019). Developing students’ worksheet based on scientific approach in cell as the system of life. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n1.109-121
Ferreira, S. (2012). Moulding urban children towards environmental stewardship: the Table Mountain National Park experience. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/135046 22.2011.622838
Flores, M. A., & Swennen, A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020. 1824253
Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: A critical process of Lesson Study. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3
Garcia, L. C. (2015). Environmental science issues for higher-order thinking skills (hots) development: A case study in the Philippines. In Biology Education and Research in a Changing Planet (pp. 45–54). https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-524-2
Girik Allo, M. D. (2020). Is the online learning good in the midst of COVID-19 Pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 1–10. https://sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/24
Hidayati, S., Irwandani, I., Yusandika, A. D., Anwar, C., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Science and environment for education: Measuring HOTSEP of electricity energy topic using Ichsan and Rahmayanti taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796, 012095. https://doi.org /10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012095
Ho, J. C. F., & Yao, M. Z. (2018). Encouraging learners to explore websites: Hyperlinks as invitations. Journal of Educators Online, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2018.15.2.4
Huang, X., Loo, B. P. Y., Zhao, Y., & Chow, A. S. Y. (2019). Incorporating personal experience in free-choice environmental learning: Lessons from a zoological theme park. Environmental Education Research, 25(8), 1250–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1569203
Hugerat, M., & Kortam, N. (2014). Improving higher order thinking skills among freshmen by teaching science through inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1107a
Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018). OIDDE learning model: Improving higher order thinking skills of biology teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/ 10.12973/iji.2018.11217a
Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahmayanti, H. (2020a). HOTSEP: Revised Anderson’s Taxonomy in environmental learning of COVID-19. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1257
Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahmayanti, H. (2020b). ITA: Innovation of science and environmental learning model in 21st century based on HOTS. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(4). https://doi. org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i4.2442
Istiana, R., & Awaludin, M. T. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan memecahkan permasalahan lingkungan pada mahasiswa pendidikan biologi dalam materi pengetahuan lingkungan melalui model inquiri berbasis lesson study. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 57–66. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/ biosfer/article/download/6026/4719/
Khoiriyah, A. J., & Husamah, H. (2018). Problem-based learning: Creative thinking skills, problem-solving skills, and learning outcome of seventh grade students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5804
Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020). The Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: how teacher educators moved practicum learning online. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820480
Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2018). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 4622, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13504622.2018.1442418
Lai, C. K. M., & Cheng, E. W. L. (2016). Green purchase behavior of undergraduate students in Hong Kong. Social Science Journal, 53(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.11.003
Lee, C. (2014). Worksheet usage, reading achievement, classes’ lack of readiness, and science achievement: A cross-country comparison. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.38331
Lewinsohn, T. M., Attayde, J. L., Fonseca, C. R., Ganade, G., Jorge, L. R., Kollmann, J., Overbeck, G. E., Prado, P. I., Pillar, V. D., Popp, D., da Rocha, P. L. B., Silva, W. R., Spiekermann, A., & Weisser, W. W. (2014). Ecological literacy and beyond: Problem-based learning for future professionals. AMBIO, 44(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0539-2
Madhuri, G. V., Kantamreddi, V. S. S. N., & Prakash Goteti, L. N. S. (2012). Promoting higher order thinking skills using inquiry-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 117–123. https:// doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.661701
Meyer, A. (2016). Heterogeneity in the preferences and pro-environmental behavior of college students: The effects of years on campus, demographics, and external factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3451–3463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.133
Mon, C. C., Dali, M. H., & Sam, L. C. (2016). Implementation of lesson study as an innovative professional development model among Malaysian school teachers. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2016.13.1.5
Nugraini, S. H., Choo, K. A., Hin, H. S., & Hoon, T. S. (2013). Students’ feedback of e-av biology website and the learning impact towards biology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 860–869. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.408
O’Brien, W., Adamakis, M., O’ Brien, N., Onofre, M., Martins, J., Dania, A., Makopoulou, K., Herold, F., Ng, K., & Costa, J. (2020). Implications for European physical education teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-institutional SWOT analysis. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1823963
Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H., Moreira, A., Lopes, B., & Watts, M. (2014). So much more than just a list: Exploring the nature of critical questioning in undergraduate sciences. Research in Science and Technological Education, 32(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.902811
Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. (2018). The Internet explosion, digital media principles and implications to communicate effectively in the digital space. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/2042753018754361
Runhaar, P., Wagenaar, K., Wesselink, R., & Runhaar, H. (2019). Encouraging students’ pro-environmental behaviour: Examining the interplay between student characteristics and the situational strength of schools. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 13(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/09734 08219840544
Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, S., Rinanto, Y., Afandi, A., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using stimulating higher order thinking skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a
Sivamoorthy, M., Nalini, R., & Kumar, C. S. (2013). Environmental awareness and practices among college students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(8), 11–15. https://doi.org/ 29.7722/0283011015
Taurina, Z. (2015). Students motivation and learning outcomes: significant factors in internal study quality assurance system. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 5(4), 2625–2630. https://infonomics-society.org/wp-content/uploads/ijcdse/published-papers/special-issue-volume-5-2015/Students-Motivation-and-Learning-Outcomes-Significant-Factors-in-Internal-Study-Quality-Assurance-System.pdf
Utami, W. S., Sumarmi, S., Ruja, I. N., & Utaya, S. (2016). The effectiveness of geography student worksheet to develop learning experiences for high school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p315
Yusnaeni, Y., Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative thinking of low academic student undergoing search solve create and share learning integrated with metacognitive strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.10.010
Zhang, X. H., Kubota, K., Kubota, M., & Li, K. (2020). Designing blended learning environments with thinking tool strategies: examining a Chinese teacher’s decision-making and beliefs. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1848874
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
