Developing the guided inquiry-based module on the circulatory system to improve student's critical thinking skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i1.16512Keywords:
Critical thinking skills, Guided inquiry model, Learning innovationAbstract
The limitations of inquiry-based teaching modules impact the low critical thinking skills of students. The research objective is to develop an inquiry-based module to improve students' critical thinking skills. This development research uses the Borg and Gall model in designing and testing the module. The development was carried out in February - November 2020 at Batik Senior High School 1 of Surakarta, Central Java. The subjects of this study were students of class XI-Science Batik Senior High School 1 of Surakarta. The assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of the module uses a validation instrument by linguists, material experts, and learning experts. Assessment of students' critical thinking skills using HOTS questions. The effectiveness of the module was tested using the Z test. The results concluded that the module was feasible to use in learning with a feasibility score of 3.83 (linguistic aspect), 3.92 (material aspect), and 3.80 (learning aspect). Furthermore, this module effectively improves students' critical thinking skills as indicated by the results of the Z test (α<0.05). This study recommends the development of inquiry-based modules in improving students' critical thinking skills.
Downloads
References
Abosalem, Y. (2016). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11
Adeyemi, S. B. (2012). Developing critical thinking skills in students: A mandate for higher education in Nigeria. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 155–161. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ EJ1086348.pdf
Adnan, A., & Bahri, A. (2018). Beyond effective teaching: Enhancing students’ metacognitive skill through guided inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 954, 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012022
Alhassora, N. S. A., Abu, M. S., & Abdullah, A. H. (2017). Newman error analysis on evaluating skills. Man In India. http://home.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/cice/wp-content/uploads/publications/Journal9-1/9-1-9.pdf
Amin, A. M., Duran Corebima, A., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2017). The critical thinking tkills profile of preservice biology teachers in animal physiology. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and Training (ICET 2017), November, 179–183. https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-17.2017.30
Anstey, L. M. (2017). “Applying anatomy to something I care about”: Authentic inquiry learning and student experiences of an inquiry project. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(6), 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1690
Bahri, A., Idris, I. S., Muis, H., Arifuddin, M., & Fikri, M. J. N. (2020). Blended learning integrated with innovative learning strategy to improve self-regulated learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14147A
Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300
Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.18200/JGEDC.2015214253
Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2016). Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0158-7
Broekhuis, M., van Velsen, L., De Franco, D., Pease, A., & Hermens, H. (2022). Contextual health information behavior in the daily lives of people with type 2 diabetes: A diary study in Scotland. Health Communication, 37(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1837426
Budiarti, S., Nuswowati, M., & Cahyono, E. (2016). Guided inquiry berbantuan e-modul untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 1(1), 1–9. http://journal.unnes.ac. id/sju/index.php/jise
Cargas, S., Williams, S., & Rosenberg, M. (2017). An approach to teaching critical thinking across disciplines using performance tasks with a common rubric. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.005
Casanoves, M., Salvadó, Z., González, Á., Valls, C., & Novo, M. T. (2017). Learning genetics through a scientific inquiry game. Journal of Biological Education, 51(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.10 80/00219266.2016.1177569
Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2016). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning: From Theory to Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
Criollo-C, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2019). Encouraging student motivation through gamification in engineering education. In M. E. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), Mobile Technologies and Applications for the Internet of Things (pp. 204–211). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11434-3_24
Danantyo, H., ES, S. M., & Lisdiana, L. (2020). Religion-based science modul on human circulatory system. Journal of Innovative Science …, 9(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v8i3.33016
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking : an outline of critical thinking dispositions. Sixth International Conference on Thinking at MIT, 1–8. https://education.illinois.edu/docs/default-source/ faculty-documents/robert-ennis/thenatureofcriticalthinking_51711_000.pdf
Ferreira, M. M., & Trudel, A. R. (2012). The impact of problem based learning (PBL) on student attitudes toward science, problem-solving skills, and sense of community in the classroom. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 47(1), 23–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43858871
Fisher, M. R. (2016). Wastewater treatment provides for authentic inquiry-based experiences in the lab and beyond. American Biology Teacher, 78(9), 739–745. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2016.78.9.739
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction, 7th edition. In Educational Research: An introduction. Pearson A&B Education. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Gall-Educational-Research-An-Introduction-7th-Edition/9780321081896.html
Hossain, Z., Bumbacher, E., Brauneis, A., Diaz, M., Saltarelli, A., Blikstein, P., & Riedel-Kruse, I. H. (2018). Design guidelines and empirical case study for scaling authentic inquiry-based science learning via open online courses and interactive biology cloud labs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 478–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0150-3
Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92
Irwan, I., Maridi, M., & Dwiastuti, S. (2019). Developing guided inquiry-based ecosystem module to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7287
Isaacs, S. (2012). Turning on mobile learning in Africa and the Middle East. In UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning. https://doi.org/10.216358
Jasti, C., Hug, B., Waters, J. L., & Whitaker, R. J. (2014). How do small things make a big difference? Activities to teach about human–microbe interactions. The American Biology Teacher, 76(9), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2014.76.9.6
Khasanah, A. N., Sajidan, S., & Widoretno, S. (2017). Effectiveness of critical thinking indicator-based module in empowering student’s learning outcome in respiratory system study material. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.8490
Kim, S. (2015). An analysis of teacher question types in inquiry-based classroom and traditional classroom settings [University of Lowa]. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567634
Kristiani, N., Susilo, H., Rohman, F., & Aloysius, D. C. (2015). The contribution of students’ metacognitive skills and scientific attitude towards their academic achievements in biology learning implementing Thinking Empowerment by Questioning (TEQ) learning integrated with inquiry learning (TEQI). International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 2(9), 113–120. https:// journalissues.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Kristiani-et-al.pdf
Lestari, D. A. B., Astuti, B., & Darsono, T. (2018). Implementasi LKS dengan pendekatan STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 4(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i2.809
Maas, T., Jochim, A., & Gross, B. (2018). Mind the gap: Will all students benefit from 21st Century learning? Center on Reinventing Public Education, October, 1–17. https://lib-ezproxy.concordia.ca/login ?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Freports%2Fmind-gap-will-all-students-benefit-21st-century%2Fdocview%2F2461139420%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D10246%0Ahttps://concordiauniversity. on.worldcat.org/atoztitles/link??sid=Pro
Maniotes, L. K., & Kuhlthau, C. C. (2014). Making the shift: From traditional research to guiding inquiry learning. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 8–17. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1045936.pdf
Mas’ud, A., Haerullah, A., Husen, I., Pagala, J., Papuangan, N., & Sundari. (2019). The development of lesson design to improve collaboration activities and scientific work of student at SMAN 6 Ternate based on lesson study for learning community. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139793
Masek, A., & Yamin, S. (2011). The effect of problem based learning on critical thinking ability: A theoretical and empirical review. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 215–221.
Mastur, M. (2017). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran di SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v4i1.10131
Nurhikmayati, I. (2019). Efektivitas bahan ajar berbasis saintifik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 3(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v3i2.1171
Opara, J. A., & Oguzor, N. S. (2011). Inquiry instructional method and the school science currículum. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 188–198. https://maxwellsci.com/print/crjss/v3-188-198.pdf
Parmin, P., & Savitri, E. N. (2020). The influence of science, environment, technology, and society in creative industries on scientific based business designing skills of pre-service science teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 8(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i1.15362
Pluta, W. J., Richards, B. F., & Mutnick, A. (2013). PBL and Beyond: Trends in collaborative learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.842917
Prayitno, B. A., Aloysius, D. C., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closing the science process skills gap between students with high and low level academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.266.
Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Schaap, L., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J., & van Gog, T. (2018). Training self-regulated learning skills with video modeling examples: do task-selection skills transfer? Instructional Science, 46(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9434-0
Ramadhani, Y., Helendra, H., Farma, S. A., & Syamsurizal, S. (2021). Validity of the human circulatory system booklets as an independent teaching material for natural science in class VIII junior high school. Bioeducation Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v5i1.288
Rofieq, A., Hindun, I., Shultonnah, L., & Miharja, F. J. (2021). Developing textbook based on scientific approach, critical thinking, and science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012030
Sajidan, S., & Afandi, A. (2019). High level thinking skills empower students primary education through innovative learning. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series, 1(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v1i2.26724
Sandika, B., & Fitrihidajati, H. (2018). Improving creative thinking skills and scientific attitude through inquiry-based learning in basic biology lecture toward students of biology education. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5326
Sari, D. E., Hindun, I., Mahmudati, N., Miharja, F. J., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Are male and female students different in high-order thinking skills? JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 42. https://doi. org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.17575
Sari, F. K., Farida, F., & Syazali, M. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran (modul) berbantuan geogebra pokok bahasan turunan. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i2.24
Setiawati, H., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). Empowering critical thinking skills of the students having different academic ability in biology learning of senior high school through PQ4R - TPS strategy. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 4(5), 3521–3526. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v4i5.09
Shofiyah, N., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Jatmiko, B. (2013). Mengembangkan penalaran ilmiah (scientific reasoning) siswa melalui model pembelajaran 5E pada siswa kelas X SMAN 15 Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2514
Su’udiah, F., Degeng, I. N. S., & Kuswandi, D. (2016). Pengembangan buku teks tematik berbasis kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(9), 1744–1748. https://doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i9.6743
Sufairoh, S. (2016). Pendekatan saintifik dan model pembelajaran K-13. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesional, 5(3). http://www.jurnalpendidikanprofesional.com/index.php/JPP/article/view/186
Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329
Suryawati, E., Suzanti, F., Suwondo, S., & Yustina, Y. (2018). The implementation of school-literacy-movement: Integrating scientific literacy, characters, and HOTS in science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6876
Susilana, R., & Ihsan, H. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan kajian teori psikologi belajar. Edutech, 1(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.17509/edutech.v13i2.3095
Vong, S. A., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss. 2016.05.002
Weinberger, Y., & Shonfeld, M. (2018). Students’ willingness to practice collaborative learning. Teaching Education, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1508280
West, D. M. (2015). Connected learning: How mobile technology can imporve education. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, December, 1–8. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/ 2016/07/west_connected-learning_v11.pdf
Wijayaningputri, A. R., Widodo, W., & Munasir, M. (2018). The effect of guided-inquiry model on science process skills indicators. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 8(1), 1542–1546. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpps/article/view/3856/2187
Yücel, Ü. A. I., & Usluel, Y. K. (2016). Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers and Education, 97, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.015
Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Mistianah. (2015). Asesmen berpikir kritis terintegrasi tes essay. Symbion: Symposium on Biology Education, 200–213. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322315188_ Asesmen_Berpikir_Kritis_Terintegrasi_Tes_Essay
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
