Promote collaboration skills during the COVID-19 pandemic through Predict-Observe-Explain-based Project (POEP) learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i1.17622Keywords:
21st-Century skills, Collaboration skills, Project-based learning, Innovative learning model, Predict-Observe-ExplainAbstract
It was previously found that students have low in learning collaboration, which is the learning process has not facilitated them to develop their skills. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of project-based learning (PjBL), Predict-Observe-Explain (POE), and Predict-Observe-Explain based Project (POEP) on student collaboration skills in Biology education. The pretest-posttest non-equivalent control design was used and it involved 144 tenth grade students from Tarakan, Indonesia. This research was conducted from August to December 2020, while observation sheets was used to assess the student collaborations skills. The instrument used is the student collaboration skill observation sheet refers to Greenstein, 2012. The collaboration skills observation sheet has a score of 1-4 from each aspect. The aspects used are working productively, showing respect, compromise, and responsibility. Data collection in this study was carried out using WhatsApp, and Google Classroom as learning platform. The results of the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that PjBL, POE, and POEP affected their collaboration skills (p < 0.005). The LSD test result showed that PjBL, POEP, POE, and conventional learning models were significantly different in improving the skills. The POEP class had the highest posttest score, hence it can be used to improve student collaboration skills. This research contributes to providing a learning experience that empowers students' online collaboration skills.
Downloads
References
Adebayo, F., & Olufunke, B. T. (2015). Generative and predict-observe-explain instructional strategies: Towards enhancing basic science practical skills of lower primary school pupils. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150404.12
Alibraheim, E. A., & El-Sayed, S. A. (2021). Exploring female undergraduate education students’ perceptions of collaborative online project-based learning (COPBL). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11079
Banawi, A., Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., & Solehuddin, M. (2019). Prospective primary school teachers’ conception change on states of matter and their changes through predict-observe-explain strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12322a
Boholano, H. (2017). Smart social networking: 21st Century teaching and learning skills. Research in Pedagogy, 7(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.45
Chenault, K. H. (2017). Building collaborative pedagogy: Lesson Study in higher education. College Quarterly, 20(1). http://ezproxy.hsutx.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db= eric&AN=EJ1131159&site=eds-live&scope=site
Cheruvelil, K. S., Palma-Dow, A. De, & Smith, K. A. (2020). Strategies to promote effective student research teams in undergraduate biology labs. American Biology Teacher, 82(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.1.18
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2016). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning: From Theory to Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2020). Research methods in education. In Research Methods in Education (Sixth). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053-23
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. In Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Third). Sage Publisher. http://books.google.com/books?id=bttwENORfhgC&pgis=1
Davidsen, J., Ryberg, T., & Bernhard, J. (2020). “Everything comes together”: Students’ collaborative development of a professional dialogic practice in architecture and design education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(June), 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100678
Evans, C. (2020). Measuring student success skills: A review of the literature on collaboration. Center For Assessment, 1–18. www.nciea.org
Gaggioli, A., Milani, L., Mazzoni, E., & Riva, G. (2011). Networked flow: A framework for understanding the dynamics of creative collaboration in educational and training settings. The Open Education Journal, 4, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712160
Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century skills. In Assessing 21st Century Skills (Issue September). Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13215
Guo, P., Saab, N., Wu, L., & Admiraal, W. (2021). The Community of inquiry perspective on students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and academic performance in online project-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12586
Haryono, A., & Adam, C. (2021). The implementation of mini-research project to train undergraduate students’ scientific writing and communication skills. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.15838
Hasan, A., & Pardjono, P. (2019). The correlation of higher order thinking skills and work readiness of vocational high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 25(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v25i1.19118
Havu-Nuutinen, S., Kervinen, A., Uitto, A., Laine, A., Koliseva, A., Pyykkö, L., Impiö, P., & Aittola, T. (2019). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ experiences of inquiry-based primary science teaching: A collaborative team teaching model. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.583
Hidayati, N. (2019). Collaboration skill of biology students at Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(11), 208–211. http://www.ijstr.org/final-print/nov2019/Collaboration-Skill-Of-Biology-Students-At-Universitas-Islam-Riau-Indonesia.pdf
Hilario, J. S. (2015). The use of Predict-Observe-Explain-Explore (POEE) as a new teaching strategy in general chemistry-laboratory. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(2), 37–48. http://www.ijern.com/journal/2015/February-2015/04.pdf
Hira, A., & Anderson, E. (2021). Motivating online learning through project-based learning during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.2.06
Ilma, S., Henie, M., Al-Muhdhar, I., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting students’ metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22083
Jasdilla, L., Fitria, Y., & Sopandi, W. (2019). Predict Observe Explain (POE) strategy toward mental model of primary students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022043
Keast, R., & Mandell, M. (2014). The collaborative push: Moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9234-5
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1044508
Khaleyla, F., Wisanti, W., Ambarwati, R., Rahayu, D. A., & Putri, E. K. (2021). Software preference for online learning of science and biology teachers under COVID-19 pandemic. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i1.14253
Koh, J. H. L., Herring, S. C., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Project-based learning and student knowledge construction during asynchronous online discussion. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.003
Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15569530
Lāma, E., & Lāma, G. (2020). Remote study process during Covid-19: Application and self-evaluation of digital communication and collaboration skills. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities …, 7(3), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v7i3.5241
Li, B., Jia, X., Chi, Y., Liu, X., & Jia, B. (2020). Project-based learning in a collaborative group can enhance student skill and ability in the biochemical laboratory: a case study. Journal of Biological Education, 54(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1600570
Lin, C. L. (2018). The development of an instrument to measure the project competences of college students in online project-based learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9708-y
Maas, T., Jochim, A., & Gross, B. (2018). Mind the gap: Will all students benefit from 21st Century learning? Center on Reinventing Public Education, October, 1–17. https://lib-ezproxy.concordia.ca/login?qurl= https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Freports%2Fmind-gap-will-all-students-benefit-21st-century% 2Fdocview%2F2461139420%2Fse2%3Faccountid%3D10246%0Ahttps://concordiauniversity.on.worldcat.org/atoztitles/link??sid=Pro
Neubert, J. C., Mainert, J., Kretzschmar, A., & Greiff, S. (2015). The assessment of 21st century skills in industrial and organizational psychology: Complex and collaborative problem solving. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 238–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.14
O’Leary, R., Choi, Y., & Gerard, C. M. (2013). The skill set of the successful collaborator. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 625–636. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41688043
Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
Pllana, D. (2019). Creativity in modern education. World Journal of Education, 9(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n2p136
Pluta, W. J., Richards, B. F., & Mutnick, A. (2013). PBL and Beyond: Trends in collaborative learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.842917
Rannikmäe, M. (2016). Some crucial areas in science education research corresponding to the needs of the contemporary society. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.04
Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1876
Sarıoğlan, A. B., & Özkaya, Ö. Ş. (2021). Predict-Observe-Explain-Do: Calculate your carbon footprint activity in distance education. JIBA) / Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi (ATED), 11(1), 30–50. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1310322.pdf
Sengul, S., & Katranci, Y. (2012). Metacognitive Aspects of Solving Function Problems. 46, 2178–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.450
Shriki, A. (2013). A model for assessing the development of students’ creativity in the context of problem posing. Creative Education, 04(07), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.47062
Shukri, A. A. M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Daud, N. (2020). Integrated STEM-based module: Relationship between students’ creative thinking and science achievement. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.12236
Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and evaluation of an integrated project-based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017–1033. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.1017
Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2020). The scientific creativity of fifth graders in a STEM project-based. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(4), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.627
Sturner, K. K., Bishop, P., & Lenhart, S. M. (2017). Developing collaboration skills in team undergraduate research experiences. Primus, 27(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1188432
Tosun, C., & Taskesenligil, Y. (2013). The effect of problem-based learning on undergraduate students’ learning about solutions and their physical properties and scientific processing skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2rp20060k
Viro, E., Lehtonen, D., Joutsenlahti, J., & Tahvanainen, V. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on project-based learning in mathematics and science. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9544
Zain, I. M. (2017). The Collaborative Instructional Design System (CIDS): Visualizing the 21st Century learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12), 2259–2266. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051216
Zanden, P. J. A. . van der, Meijer, P. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). A review study about creativity in adolescence: Where is the social context? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(May), 100702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100702
Zulkarnaen, Z., Supardi, Z. . I., & Jatmiko, B. (2017). Feasibility of creative exploration, creative elaboration, creative modeling, practice scientific creativity, discussion, reflection (C3PDR) teaching model to improve students’ scientific creativity of junior high school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.1020
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
