Performance assessment to measure creativity through STREAM approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.20157Keywords:
Creativity, Performance assessment, STREAMAbstract
Learning online during pandemic COVID-19 must still accommodate creativity. This study aimed to identify the level of student creativity using the STREAM (Science-Technology-Religion-Engineering-Arts-Mathematics) approach. It was conducted on an online practicum in the Plant Anatomy course. The purpose of this study was to identify the level of student creativity in various indicators of creativity through a performance assessment of the product of the practicum report. The static-group comparison design was used as the research design. The target population is the fourth-semester student in the Department of Biology Education. The samples were chosen using purposive sampling, determining class IV-A (39 students) as a regular class and class IV-C (38 students) as intervention one. The research was equipped with creativity performance tasks, rubrics with a scoring of practicum reports' performance assessments, and field notes. Each student designs and makes one of the anatomical structural models of roots, stems, or leaves. The practicum report was used to identify their level of creativity. The data were analyzed by calculating the creativity level percentage in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results showed that the creativity level of the intervention class is excelling (57.89%), while the regular class the emerging (58.79%). The STREAM approach provides a better level of creativity.
Downloads
References
Religion-Engineering-Arts-Mathematics) membekalkan kebiasaan berpikir mahasiswa. EDUSAINS, 12(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.15408/ES.V12I2.17605
Agustina, T. W., Rustaman, N. Y., Riandi, R., & Purwianingsih, W. (2019). Membekalkan kreativitas mahasiswa melalui strategi pembelajaran berbasis STREAM menggunakan konten Bioteknologi Tradisional. Jurnal BIOEDUIN : Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.15575/ bioeduin.v9i1.4343
Agustina, T. W., Sholikha, M., Mas’ud, A., & Amelia, L. (2022). Creating plant anatomy structure model using Science, Technology, Religion, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics (STREAM) Approach. Islamic Research, 5(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.47076/jkpis.v5i1.106
Ahmad, D. N., Astriani, M. M., Alfahnum, M., & Setyowati, L. (2021). Increasing creative thinking of students by learning organization with STEAM education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V10I1.27146
Al-Karasneh, S. M., & Saleh, A. M. J. (2010). Islamic perspective of creativity: A model for teachers of social studies as leaders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/ J.SBSPRO.2010.03.036
Allina, B. (2018). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017. 1296392
Anindya, F. A. U., & Wusqo, I. U. (2020). The influence of PjBL-STEAM model toward students’ problem-solving skills on light and optical instruments topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042054
Annisa, R., Haris, M., Hsb, E., & Damris, M. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dengan menggunakan model Project Based Learning berbasis STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts Dan Mathematic) pada materi asam dan basa di SMAN 11 Kota Jambi. Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry (On Progress), 10(2), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.22437/jisic.v10i2.6517
Anwari, I., Yamada, S., Unno, M., Saito, T., Suwarma, I., Mutakinati, L., & Kumano, Y. (2015). Implementation of authentic learning and assessment through STEM education approach to improve students' metacognitive skills. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 123–136. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/209546/
Azizah, W. A., Sarwi, & Ellianawati. (2019). Pendekatan STREAM terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana 2019, 462–466. https://proceeding.unnes. ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/download/326/352
Basham, J. D., & Marino, M. T. (2013). Understanding STEM education and supporting students through universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 004005991304500401
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2014). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ898909
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. STEM Project-Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach, 1–210. https://link. springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
Care, E. (2018). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Research and applications. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills Research and Applications, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_1
Care, E., & Kim, H. (2018). Assessment of twenty-first century skills: The issue of authenticity. 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_2
Chandrasiri, N. R., & Weerakoon, B. S. (2021). Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions of allied health sciences undergraduates. Radiography (London, England : 1995). https://doi.org/10. 1016/J.RADI.2021.11.008
Cheng, V. M. Y. (2011). Infusing creativity into Eastern classrooms: Evaluations from student perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2010.05.001
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the code? How creativity & motivation interacts with inquiry-based learning. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 284–295. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10400419.2019.1641678
Cutri, R. M., Mena, J., & Whiting, E. F. (2020). Faculty readiness for online crisis teaching: transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1815702
Darmalaksana, W. (2021). Paradigma Wahyu Memandu Ilmu (WMI) dalam pengajaran, penelitian, dan pengabdian kepada masyarakat. In Pre-Print Kelas Menulis UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung (pp. 1–10). http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/42189/1/PARADIGMA WAHYU MEMANDU ILMU.pdf
Daud, A. M., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2012). Creativity in science education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467 – 474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302
Dong, Y., Zhu, S., & Li, W. (2021). Promoting sustainable creativity: An empirical study on the application of mind mapping tools in graphic design education. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 5373, 13(10), 5373. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13105373
Fatmah, H. (2021). Kreativitas peserta didik dalam pembelajaran Bioteknologi dengan PjBL berbasis STEAM. Pedagonal : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.55215/PEDAGONAL.V5I1.2574
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8a ed.) McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265086460_How_to_Design_and_ Evaluate_Research_in_Education
Gomes, D. M., & McCauley, V. (2021). Creativity in science: A dilemma for informal and formal education. Science Education, 105(3), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.21614
Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, M. I. A., & Maris, I. M. (2018). Revisiting generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 355–363. https://doi. org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438
Haviz, M., Lufri, L., & Maris, I. M. (2020). Assessing prospective biology teachers (PBTs) perceptions on thinking as a 21st century skill: A case study at Islamic University. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24077
Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM Journal, 1(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20140102.15
Hunter-Doniger, T., & Sydow, L. (2016). A journey from STEM to STEAM: A middle school case study. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(4–5), 159–166. https://doi. org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1170461
Jacques, L. A., Cian, H., Herro, D. C., & Quigley, C. (2019). The impact of questioning techniques on STEAM instruction. Action in Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848
Liao, C., Motter, J. L., & Patton, R. M. (2016). Tech-Savvy girls: Learning 21st-century skills through STEAM digital artmaking. Art Education, 69(4), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176492
Muhibbuddin, M., Safrida, S., & Hasanuddin, H. (2018). Plant anatomy learning on based practices through the inquiry strategy: Efforts to equip the ability of the science process and skills of the use of microscope equipment student of biology education. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 4(11), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.455618
Muspiroh, N. (2012). Analisis kemampuan generik sains mahasiswa calon guru biologi pada praktikum anatomi tumbuhan. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/sc. educatia.v1i1.503
Nuraeni, E., Redjeki, S., Riandi, R., & Rahmat, A. (2015). Perkembangan literasi kuantitatif tumbuhan berbasis dimensi belajar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(2), 127–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jip.v21i2. 5836
Oner, A. T., Nite, S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2016). From STEM to STEAM: Students’ beliefs about the use of their creativity. The STEAM Journal, 2(2). https://scholarship.claremont.edu/steam/vol2/iss2/6
Pahlelawati, N., Putri, A. N., & Hindrasti, N. E. K. (2020). Media tiga dimensi model kayu pada materi struktur dan fungsi jaringan tumbuhan Kelas VIII. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Undiksha, 7(1), 8–17. https:// ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPB/article/view/23496/14972
Patresia, I., Silitonga, M., & Ginting, A. (2020). Developing biology students’ worksheet based on STEAM to empower science process skills. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) , 6(1), 147–156. https://doi. org/10.22219/JPBI.V6I1.10225
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Putri, C. D., Pursitasari, I. D., & Rubini, B. (2020). Problem based learning terintegrasi STEM di era pandemi Covid-19 untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 4(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v4i2.17859
Rachmawati, Y., Ridwan, A., & Hadinugrahaningsih, T. (2018). Keterampilan abad 21 dan steam project dalam pembelajaran kimia. CV Campustaka. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=11962 65
Rohman, A., Ishafit, I., & Husna, H. (2021). Pengaruh penerapan model Project Based Learning terintegrasi STEAM terhadap berpikir kreatif ditinjau dari pemahaman konsep fisika Siswa SMA pada materi dinamika rotasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online, 9(1), 15–21. http://jurnal.fkip.untad.ac.id/ index.php/jpft
Rustaman, N. Y., Afianti, E., & Maryati, S. (2018). STEM based learning to facilitate middle school students’ conceptual change, creativity and collaboration in organization of living system topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012021
Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/ J.TSC.2018.08.001
Septiani, A., & Rustaman, N. Y. (2017). Implementation of performance assessment in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) education to detect science process skill. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 812, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012052
Sugianto, S., Fitriani, A., Angraeni, S., & Setiawan, W. (2020). Corelation of multiple intelegence profiles on initial conditions of plant anatomy practicum to the needs of a blended learning digital microscope. Mangifera Edu, 4(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.31943/mangiferaedu.v4i2.82
Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom: What research says to the teacher. https://eric.ed.gov/?id= ED132593
Wandari, G. A., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Agustin, R. R. (2018). The effect of STEAM-based learning on students’ concept mastery and creativity in learning light and optics. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i1.12878
Yakob, M., Hamdani, H., Sari, R. P., Haji, A. G., & Nahadi, N. (2021). Implementation of performance assessment in STEM-based science learning to improve students’ habits of mind. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(2), 624–631. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE. V10I2.21084
Yuhanna, W. L., & Retno, R. S. (2016). The learning of science basic concept by using scientific inquiry to improve student’s thinking, working, and scientific attitude abilities. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v2i1.2703
Zubaidah, S. (2019). STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics): Pembelajaran untuk memberdayakan keterampilan abad ke-21. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Sains, September, 1–18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336065211_STEAM_Science_Technology_Engineering _Arts_and_Mathematics_Pembelajaran_untuk_Memberdayakan_Keterampilan_Abad_ke-21
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
