Metacognitive skill profile of biology education students at institute of teachers’ education in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.20732Keywords:
Biology education students' , Metacognitive skills, Teachers’ educationAbstract
Metacognitive skills are one of the abilities required in the twenty-first century, to achieve independent learning. However, these skills still need to review whether these skills have been empowered by educators, particularly in universities. This research was aimed at determining the metacognitive skill profile of Biology Education students at the Institute of Teachers’ Education in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. This research used a descriptive quantitative method. The population of this research was all the students of the Biology Education Study Program at the non-state Institute of Teachers’ Education in South Sulawesi. The samples of this research were 356 Biology Education students in the second semester who programmed the Environmental Science course in the 2020/2021 academic year. The instrument used in this research was an essay test to measure students’ metacognitive skills in the Environmental Science course. The results of the data analysis indicate that the students’ metacognitive skills are in the category of undeveloped as much as 89.27%. Therefore, some efforts to improve students’ metacognitive skills are required by those institutes through the implementation of a learning model which can empower the metacognitive skills of the prospective Biology teacher students.
Downloads
References
Adiansyah, R. (2022). Profil keterampilan metakognitif mahasiswa calon guru biologi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Bone. Al-Nafis: Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi, 2(1), 27–37. http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al-Nafis/article/view/766
Ahmad, S. (2017). The role of LPTK in strengthening the character of educator candidates. Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 6(10), 65–70. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/oct2017/The-Role-Of-Lptk-In-Strengthening-The-Character-Of-Educator-Candidates.pdf
Amin, A. M. (2017). Pre service biology teachers’ argumentation skills in animal physiology laboratory. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v22i2.8696
Amin, A. M. (2022). Self-Efficacy mahasiswa biologi setelah penerapan model WE-ARe (Warm-up, Exploring, Argumentation, Resume). Jurnal AL-Nafis, 2(1), 117–128. http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al-Nafis/issue/view/85/showToc
Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2018). Lecturers’ perception on students’ critical thinking skills development and problems faced by students in developing their critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5181
Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2020). Identification of preservice biology teachers’ metacognitive awareness and metacognitive skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511 01202, 1–8. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012029
Amin, A. M., Ahmad, S. H., Zulkarnaim, & Adiansyah, R. (2022). RQANI : A Learning model that integrates science concepts and islamic values in biology learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15338a
Amin, A. M., & Corebima, A. D. (2016). Analisis persepsi dosen terhadap strategi pembelajaran reading questiong and answering (RQA) dan argument-driven inquiry (ADI) pada program studi pendidikan biologi di kota Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional II Tahun 2016, Kerjasama Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan Dan Kependudukan (PSLK) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, March, 333–347. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321144722
Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2017). Identifikasi kemampuan bertanya dan berpendapat calon guru biologi pada mata kuliah fisiologi hewan. Bioedukasi, 15(1), 24–31. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/321145036
Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). The correlation between metacognitive skills and critical thinking skills at the implementation of four different learning strategies in animal physiology lectures. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10. 12973/eu-jer.9.1.143
Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016a). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep dan Metode Pembelajaran dalam Pembelajaran Calon Guru Biologi di Kota Makassar. Seminar Nasional Ke-3 Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ke-3 Biologi, IPA, Dan Pembelajarannya, 1191–1200. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/322162708
Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016b). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan metode pembelajaran dalam pembelajaran calon guru biologi di Kota Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ke-3 Biologi, IPA, Dan Pembelajarannya, October 2016, 1192–1200. https://pasca.um.ac.id/ conferences/index.php/ice/article/view/20/0
Amnah, S. (2014). The Profile of Awareness and metacognitive strategies of new students of biology education of teacher training and education faculty of Universitas Islam Riau Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2897
Arfandy, H. (2014). Evaluasi Kinerja guru pasca tersertifikasi di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Samkarya Nugraha.
Arnett, C., & Suner, F. (2019). Leveraging cognitive linguistic approacher to grammar teaching with multimedia animation. Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(3), 365–399. https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2019. 20.3.365
Aurah, C. M. (2013). The effects of self-efficacy beliefs and metacognition on academic performance: a mixed method study. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(8), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.12691/ education-1-8-11
Azhar, A. (2009). The condition of LPTK as a professional teacher education institution. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS UNIMED, 6(1), 1–13. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/696/1/Kondisi LPTK sebagai pencetak guru yang profesional.pdf
Bahri, A. (2015). Pengaruh strategi problem based learning (PBL) terintegrasi reading, questioning, and answering (RQA) pada perkuliahan biologi dasar terhadap motivasi belajar, keterampilan metakognitif, hasil belajar kognitif, retensi, dan karakter mahasiswa berkemampuan [PPS State University of Malang]. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/11381/1/abstrak disertasi.pdf
Bahri, A. (2016). Strategi pembelajaran reading questioning and answering (RQA) pada perkuliahan fisiologi hewan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif mahasiswa. Jurnal Bionature, 17(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.35580/bionature.v17i2.2840
Bahri, A., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). The Contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcome of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.487
Chalmers, D. J. (2011). A computational foundation for the study of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 323–357. https://philpapers.org/rec/CHAACF-2
Corebima, A. . (2009). Metacognitive skill measurment integrated in achievement test. Paper Presented at The Third CosMED in Penang, Malaysia., 5(1). https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?q=related:qSBZNG Rozq4J:scholar.google.com/&scioq=&hl=id&as_sdt=0,5
Corebima, A. D. (2006a). Metakognisi: Suatu ringkasan kajian. Paper Presented at Metacognitive Strategy Training on Biology Learning for Senior High School Biology Teachers in Palangkaraya, 23 Ausgust 2006. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=EobB1ssAAAAJ&citatio n_for_view=EobB1ssAAAAJ:lvd772isFD0C
Corebima, A. D. (2006b). Pembelajaran biologi yang memberdayakan kemampuan berpikir siswa [Biology learning which empowers students’ thinking ability. Paper Presented at Metacognitive Strategy Training on Biology Learning for Senior High School Biology Teachers. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations? view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=EobB1ssAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citation_for_view=EobB1ssAAAAJ:tH6gc1N1XXoC
Coutinho, S. . (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate Journal, 7(1), 39–47. https://www.educatejournal.org/index.php/educate/article/view/116
Downing, K. . (2009). Self-Efficacy and metacognitive development. The International Journal of Learning, 16(4), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494%2FCGP%2FV16I04%2F46214
Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak. (1996). Strategies for teachers. Allyn and Bacon.
Fitriani, R. (2016). Perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif mahasiswa biologi yang menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri dan group investigation. Bioedusiana, 1(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/ 10.3428 9/277879
Green, R. (2007). Better Thingking better learning an introduction to cognitive education. http://curriculum. pgwe.gov.za/curr_dev_home/better_think/indeks.htm.
Hardianto. (2014). Identifikasi permasalahan belajar mahasiswa program studi pendidikan biologi fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan Universitas Pasir Pengaraian. Jurnal Ilmiah Edu Research, 3(2), 81–88. https://e-journal.upp.ac.id/index.php/EDU/article/view/131
Herlanti, Y., Rustaman, N. ., Rohman, I., & Fitriani, A. (2012). Kualitas argumentasi pada diskusi sosiosaintifik mikrobiologi melalui weblog. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.15294/ jpii.v1i2.2135
Howard, J. B. (2004). Metacognitive inquiry. School of Education Elon University. https://org.elon.edu /t2project/pdf_docs/sp_metacognitive.pdf.
Kinshuk, L., T.C, & Graf, S. (2009). Coping with mismatched courses: Students’ behaviour and performance in courses mismatched to their learning styles. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(6), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9116-y
Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. ETR & D, 49(2), 23–40. https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/BF02504926
Louca, E. P. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530300200184
Mesaros, P., Mesarosova, M., & Mesarosova, L. (2012). Learning to learn competency, metacognitive learning strategies and academic self concept of university students. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 5(2), 489–497. http://splet03.izum.si:2105/docview/1285162030/fulltextPDF?accountid=31 309
Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rochman, F. (2016). Pengembangan model pembelajaran reading mind mapping sharing (rms) dan pengaruhnya terhadap penguasaan konsep, keterampilan berpikir kritis, keterampilan metakognitif, serta retensi mahasiswa berkemampuan akademik berbeda [Malang: PPS State University of Malang]. http://repository.um.ac.id/id/eprint/64654
Naimnule, L., & Corebima, A. D. (2018). The correlation between metacognitive skills and criticak thinking skills toward students’ process skills in biology learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2(2), 122–134. https://www.ijopr.com/volume-2/issue-2
Nurman, R., Hala, Y., & Bahri, A. (2018). Profil keterampilan metakognitif dan sikap ilmiah mahasiswa Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM. Proceeding at Seminar Nasional Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 371–376. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/semnasbio/article/view/6988
Peters, M. (2000). Does contructivist epistemology have a place in nurse education. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(4), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20000401-07
Pratama, A. . (2018). Peningkatan hasil belajar kognitif menggunakan strategi pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) pada pembelajaran biologi di Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Jurnal Biolokus, 1(2), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v1i2.372
Rahayu. (2012). Kompetensi pedagogik dan kepribadian guru biologi bersertifikat pendidik di SMA 3 Semarang. Jurnal Unnes, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15294/jbe.v1i2.1155
Ramdiah, S., & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning strategy equalizing students’ achievement, metacognitive, and critical thinking skills. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 577–584. https://doi.org/ 10.12691/education-2-8-3
Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan keterampilan abad Ke-21 dalam pembelajaran kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2239–2253. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK/article/view/17824
Reid, R. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction. University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Department of Special Education and Communication. http://www.unl.edu/csi/index.shtml.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assesing metacognitive awareness contenporary. Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for 21st century? UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, Paris. (ERF Working Papers Series, No. 14). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ ark:/48223/pf0000242996
Setiawan, D., & Susilo, H. (2015). . Peningkatan keterampilan metakognitif mahasiswa program studi biologi melalui penerapan jurnal belajar dengan strategi Jigsaw dipadu PBL berbasis lesson study pada mata kuliah biologi umum. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi 2015 UMM, 359–369. https://biology.umm.ac.id/files/file/359-369 Deny Setiawan .pdf
Shovkova, O., & Pasichnyk, I. (2019). The illusion of thinking in metacognitive monitoring of university students. Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(1), 79–110. https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2019.20.1.79
Slavin, R. E. (2000). Educational psychology. Sixth Edition. Allyn and Bacon. https://www.biblio.com/ book/educational-psychology-theory-practice-6th-edition/d/120372478
Soetjipto, & Kosasi, R. (1994). Profesi keguruan. Rineka Cipta.
Stolp, S., & Zabrucky, K. . (2009). Contributions of metacognitive and self-regulated learning theories to investigations of calibration of comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 7–31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1052046
Suryawati, E., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). The effectiveness of rangka contextual teaching and learning on students’ problem solving skills and scientific attitude. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1717–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.389
Tsai, C. C. & Huang, C. M. (2002). Exploring students cognitive structures in learning science: a review of relevant methods. Journal Biology Education, 36(4), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266 .2002.9655827
Tze, V. M. C., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10648-015-9301-y
Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2009). University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science, 38(4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9088-z
Yustina, P., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2011). Developing positive attitudes towards environmental management: constructivist approach. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 4048-4052. https://repository.unri.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/5730/Jurnal ScienceDirect 2011.pdf?seq uence=1&isAllowed=y
Yustina, P., & Vebrianto, R. (2009). The students learning of science biology at SMPN 5 Pekanbaru by using constructivism approach. Proceedings of Seminar Serantau Ke 4. Seremban.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
