The WE-ARe model’s potential to enhance digital literacy of preservice biology teachers

Authors

  • Astuti Muh Amin Tadris Biology, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate
  • Fitriyah Karmila Tadris Biology, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate
  • Zainal A. Laode Tadris Biology, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate
  • E. Ermin Department of Biology Education, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Kie Raha
  • Adjar Yusrandi Akbar Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Health Science, Asia University
  • Mulkah Adebisi Ahmed Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i1.23061

Keywords:

biology education, digital literacy, preservice biology teachers, WE-ARe model

Abstract

In the era of globalization, digital literacy has become one of the competencies that students must possess. Rarely can one find research that examines the effect of the WE-ARe model on digital literacy in biology education. WE-ARe is a constructivist-based active learning model consisting of Warm-up, Exploring, Argumentation, and Resume phases that emphasize students’ collaborative and elaborative qualities. The objective of the study was to determine the impact of the WE-ARe model on the digital literacy of future biology teacher candidates. This is a quasi-experimental study using the Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The research population comprised all Tadris Biology students from IAIN Ternate and STKIP Kie Raha in the City of Ternate, North Maluku, Indonesia. The research sample contained 60 fourth-semester students from the Department of Tadris Biology. The validity score for the literacy digital instrument was 3.89 (very valid), while the correlation value (r-calculated) was 0.585. The Cronbach-Alpha analysis showed a score of 0.939, indicating that the literacy digital instrument was valid and reliable for use in data collection. This study was conducted during the even semester of the 2021/2022 academic year. The data were analyzed through ANACOVA using 5% level of significance. The results demonstrated that the WE-ARe model had an impact on the preservice biology teachers’ digital literacy. The findings of this study provide an insight on the use of a new learning model that can be used to enhance students’ 21st century skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduh, M., & Istiqomah, A. (2021). Analisis muatan hots dan kecakapan abad 21 pada buku siswa kelas V tema ekosistem di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2069–2081. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1124.

Acun, I. (2020). The relationship among university students’ trust, self-esteem, satisfaction with life and social media use1. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1313a

Adeoye, A. A., & Adeoye, B. J. (2017). Digital literacy skills of undergraduate students in Nigeria Universities. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 1665, 1–23. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4736&context=libphilprac

Ambarwati, R., Faizah, U., & Rahayu, D. A. (2019). Enhancing the digital literacy of pre-service biology teacher through animal systematics course. Advances in Computer Science Research, 95, 197–201. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-19.2019.46

Amin, A. M. (2022a). Self-Efficacy mahasiswa biologi setelah penerapan model WE-ARe (warm-up, exploring, argumentation, resume). Jurnal AL-Nafis, 2(1), 117–128. http://journal.iain-ternate.ac.id/index.php/Al-Nafis/article/view/768

Amin, A M, Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2020). The correlation between metacognitive skills and critical thinking skills at the implementation of four different learning strategies in animal physiology lectures. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.143

Amin, A. M. (2022b). Model WE-ARe dalam tantangan pembelajaran abad 21. Akademia Pustaka. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=02Z9EFQAAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=02Z9EFQAAAAJ:OU6Ihb5iCvQC

Amin, A. M., & Corebima, A. D. (2016). Analisis persepsi dosen terhadap strategi pembelajaran reading questioning and answering (RQA) dan argumment-driven inquiry (ADI). Prosiding Seminar Nasional II Tahun 2016, Kerjasama Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Dengan Pusat Studi Lingkungan Dan Kependudukan (PSLK) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, November 2017, 333–347. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321144722_Analisis_Persepsi_Dosen_terhadap_Strategi_Pembelajaran_Reading_Questiong_and_Answering_RQA_dan_Argument-Driven_Inquiry_ADI_pada_Program_Studi_Pendidikan_Biologi_di_Kota_Makassar

Amin, H., Malik, M. A., & Akkaya, B. (2022). Development and validation of digital literacy scale (DLS) and its implication for higher education. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v7i1.2224

Argentin, G., Pennisi, A., Vidoni, D., Abbiati, G., & Caputo, A. (2014). Trying to raise (low) math achievement and to promote (rigorous) policy evaluation in Italy: Evidence from a Large-scale randomized trial. Evaluation Review, 38(2), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X14529125.

Arjaya, I. B. A., Hermawan, I. M. S., Ekayanti, N. W., & Paraniti, A. A. I. (2023). Metacognitive contribution to biology pre-service teacher’s digital literacy and self-regulated learning during online learning. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16125a

Aslan, S. (2021). Analysis of digital literacy self-efficacy levels of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.46328/ijte.47

Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve students digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613

Bahri, A., Jamaluddin, A., Novia, A. A., & Saparuddin. (2022). Students’ and teachers’ digital literacy skill: A comparative study between schools, classes, and genders in urban and rural areas. International Journal of Science and Research, 11(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR22130101519

Beckmann, J., & Weber, P. (2015). Cognitive presence in virtual collaborative learning: Assessing and improving critical thinking in online discussion forums. International Association for Development of the Information Society, 13(1), 51–58. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562486.pdf

Chan, B. S. K., Churchill, D., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Digital literacy learning in higher education through digital storytelling approach. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v13i1.9907

Curran, V., Gustafson, D. L., Simmons, K., Lannon, H., Wang, C., Garmsiri, M., Fleet, L., & Wetsch, L. (2019). Adult learners’ perceptions of self-directed learning and digital technology usage in continuing professional education: An update for the digital age. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 25(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971419827318

Davidson, C. (2012). Seeking the green basilisk lizard: Acquiring digital literacy practices in the home. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 12(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411416788

Dominggus, R., Kristin, S., Martha M, B., Since Y, K., Vera V, K., & CorneliLatu, P. (2021). Resource based learning design thinking (RBLDT): A model to Improve students’ creativez thinking skills, concept gaining, and digital literacy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5528

Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2019). Preparing for life in a digital world: The IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018 international report. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-11/ICILS 2019 Digital final 04112019.pdf

Gruszczynska, A., & Pountney, R. (2013). Developing the concept of digital literacy in the context of schools and teacher education. Enhancing Lerning in the Social Science, 5(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2013.05010025

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(February), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Harris, C., Straker, L., & Pollock, C. (2017). A socioeconomic related “digital divide” exists in how, not if, young people use computers. PLoS ONE, 12(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175011

Hazar, Z. (2019). An analysis of the relationship between digital game playing motivation and digital game addiction among children. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2019.51.31.38

Helsper, E. J., & Smahel, D. (2019). Excessive internet use by young Europeans: Psychological vulnerability and digital literacy? Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1563203

Iman, J. N., & Angraini, N. (2019). Discussion task model in EFL classroom: EFL learners’ perception, oral proficiency, and critical thinking achievements. Pedagogika, 133(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2019.133.3

Karagul, B. I., Seker, M., & Aykut, C. (2021). Investigating students’ digital literacy levels during online education due to COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(11878). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111878

Khan, N., Sarwar, A., Chen, T. ., & Khan, S. (2022). Connecting digital literacy in higher education to the 21st Century workforce. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 14(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.004

Kranzow, J., & Hyland, N. (2011). Marketing climate: New considerations for target marketing in graduate student enrollment management. Journal of College Admission, 211, 22–25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ926820.pdf

Le, B., Lawrie, G. A., & Wang, J. T. H. (2022). Student self-perception on digital literacy in STEM blended learning environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09956-1

Lembani, R., Gunter, A., Breines, M., & Dalu, M. T. B. (2020). The same course, different access: The digital divide between urban and rural distance education students in South Africa. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1694876

Makur, A. P. (2019). The influence of PQ4R strategy and mathematical reasoning ability towards mathematical communication skills. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 3(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v3i1.1467

Mnyanda, L., & Mbelani, M. (2018). Are we teaching critical digital literacy ? grade 9 learners ’ practices of digital communication. Reading & Writing, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v9i1.188

Mudra, H. (2020). Digital literacy among young learners: How do efl teachers and Learners view its benefits and barriers ? Teaching English with Technology, 20(3), 3–24. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-b96ae22d-d0db-4654-8326-ff613391cb2a

Nancy, L., Woo, D., de la Torre, J., & Wong, G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. In UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf

Norte, P., Negreiros, J., & Correia, A. (2017). Cultivating students’ reading literacy using digital lexile based reading in a Chinese Primary School. International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2017), 2, 51–59. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED579453.pdf

Pepito, M. J. T., & Acledan, M. Y. (2022). Influence of digital literacy and self-directed learning in the online learning success of STEM college students. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 9(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0901007

Perdana, R., Jumadi, J., Rosana, D., & Riwayani, R. (2020). The online laboratory simulation with concept mapping and problem based learning (OLS-CMPBL): Is it effective in improving students’ digital literacy skills? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.31491

Persky, A. M., Medina, M. S., & Castleberry, A. N. (2019). Developing critical thinking skills in pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(2), 7033–7042. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7033

Pratolo, B. W., & Solikhati, H. A. (2021). Investigating teachers’ attitude toward digital literacy in EFL classroom. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.15747

Purnamasari, L., Herlina, K., Distrik, I. W., & Andra, D. (2021). Students’ digital literacy and collaboration abilities: An analysis in Senior High School students. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i1.8452

Purwanti, A., Hujjatusnaini, N., Septiana, N., Jasiah, J., & Amin, A. M. (2022). Analisis keterampilan berpikir Kritis mahasiswa melalui model blended-project based learning terintegrasi keterampilan abad 21 berdasarkan students skill. JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA), 6(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v6i3.25128

Radovan, V. (2014). Digital literacy as a prerequisite for achieving good academic performance. Information Literacy. Lifelong Learning and Digital Citizenship in the 21st Century, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14136-7_17

Rini, R., Mujiyati, Sukamto, I., & Hariri, H. (2022). The Effect of self-directed learning on students’ digital literacy levels in online learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15318a

Rundel, C., & Salemink, K. (2021). Education sciences bridging digital Inequalities in rural schools in Germany: A geographical lottery ? Education Sciences, 11(181), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5528

Sadaf, A., Wu, T., & Martin, F. (2021). Cognitive presence in online learning: A systematic review of empirical research from 2000 to 2019. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100050

Samson, N. L., Boyles, L. Z., & Arnado, A. A. (2021). Spiral progression approach: digital literacy and competency in teaching science. International Journal of Education and Research, 9(9), 111–120. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2021/September-2021/09.pdf

Saxena, P., Gupta, S. K., Mehrotra, D., Kamthan, S., Sabir, H., Katiyar, P., & Sai Prasad, S. V. (2018). Assessment of digital literacy and use of smart phones among Central Indian dental students. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 8(1), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.10.001

Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2019). The relation between students’ socioeconomic status and ICT literacy: Findings from a meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 138(0317), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.011

Selfa S. M., & Llovera M. L. (2016). Scientific studies on literacy and digital literacy indexed in scopus: A literature review (2000-2013). Actualidades Pedagógicas, 67, 197. https://doi.org/10.19052/ap.3579

Setiawan, D., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2021). RICOSRE: Effect and potential to enhance biology students’ digital literacy at Universitas Negeri Malang. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(030041). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043139

Statistik, B. P. (2020). Statistik telekomunikasi Indonesia 2019. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/12/02/be999725b7aeee62d84c6660/statistik-telekomunikasi-indonesia-2019.html

Utama, C., Sajidan, Nurkamto, J., & Wiranto. (2019). Investigating biology pre-service teacher perception of general biology and digital literacy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243(012046), 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012046

Visser, R., & Flynn, A. B. (2018). What are students’ learning and experiences in an online learning tool designed for cognitive and metacognitive skill development? Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v11i0.5039

Vodă, A. I., Cautisanu, C., Grădinaru, C., Tănăsescu, C., & de Moraes, G. H. S. M. (2022). Exploring digital literacy skills in economics and social sciences and humanities students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(5), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052483

Waldrip B, & Prain, V. (2016). Using multimodal representations to support learning in the science classroom. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16450-2

Watson, F. F., Castano Bishop, M., & Ferdinand-James, D. (2017). Instructional strategies to help online students learn: Feedback from online students. TechTrends, 61(5), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0216-y

Downloads

Published

2023-02-17 — Updated on 2023-02-17

Issue

Section

Research Literacy and Trend