Animal ethics in biology teaching and research in selected Asian countries

Authors

  • Robert Wallis Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research & Innovation), Federation University Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i2.25263

Keywords:

animal ethics, Asia, live animals, research

Abstract

Governance and regulation of the use of live animals in research and teaching is examined in Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, China, Japan and India. A comparison of the systems in different countries will enable the determination of best practice and fit-for-purpose regulation. The most comprehensive government regulation of animal welfare in institutions covers a broad range of animals and institutions are required to have an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, whose membership is specified in guidelines or regulations. The work of the Committees is rigorously overseen by government and facilities that use live animals are audited externally. All countries examined have legislation governing the use of live animals in research, although only Australia and Malaysia have a fully equivalent mandated oversight of teaching. Teaching that uses live animals is partly covered in the Philippines, Japan, Singapore and Thailand This paper thus aims to review the regulation of animal use in different Asian jurisdictions in order to determine best practices that are appropriate to those settings. The most comprehensive oversight is provided in Australia and Malaysia that essentially use the same regulatory framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anh, P. J., & Rho, S. (2022). Operational issues of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Korea. Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2022 Jul;23(4): e59. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.22087

Animal Welfare Board (2020). Malaysian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (MYCODE). Department of Veterinary Sciences, Putrajaya. https://awa.dvs.gov.my/KodAmalan/788993457-kodAmalan.pdf (accessed 12 Jan 2023).

ANZCAART (2022). Openness agreement. https://www.anzccart.org.nz/openness-agreement (accessed 27 May 2023).

ANZCAART (2023). Openness agreement on animal research and teaching in Australia. https://anzccart.adelaide.edu.au/openness-agreement (accessed 27 May 2023).

Bayne, K., Wang, J., & Pang, W. (2018). Oversight of animal research in China. Pp 263 – 291 in Guillén, J. (ed) (2017). Laboratory Animals. Regulations and Recommendations for the Care and Use of Animals in Research. (op. cit.). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849880-4.00009-X

Bhumibol Adulyadej, REX. (2015). Animals for Scientific Purposes Act 2015, B.E. 2558 (A.D. 2015). https://www.aaalac.org/resources/Thai_Animals_for_Scientific_Purposes_Act_English_Translated_version.pdf (accessed 24 Feb 2023).

Bishop, L. J., & Nolen. A. L. (2001). Animals in research and teaching: ethical issues. Kennedy Institute Ethics Journal 11(1), 92 – 112. DOI: 10.1353/ken.2001.0006

Cao, D. (2018). Ethical questions for research ethics: animal research in China. Journal of Animal Ethics 8 (2), 138 – 149. https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.8.2.0138

Cvek, K., Varga, O. E., Schuppli, C., Ormandy, E., Guillen, J., Gruber, F., & Fernandes, J. (2017). 5 – regulation and Legislation: Overview and Regulation. Pp 68 – 90 in Rocklinsberg et al. (2017) op. cit. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108354882.006

Gettayacamin, M., Grant, R., Davun, H., Heidrich, J. E., San, S., Paramastri, A., Winoto, I. L., Sajuthi, D., Meng, G. Y., Mutalib, A. R., Resuello, R. R. G., Estacio, A. A. C., Tuplano, J. V., Wong, H. M., Daludado, C. I., Kunjara, P., Donavanik, J., Chatikavanij, P., Pholpramool, C., Quoc, N. B., & Tiep, N. B. (2018). Pp. 319 – 373 in Guillén, J. (ed) op. cit.

Guillén, J. (ed) (2018). Laboratory animals. Regulations and Recommendations for the Care and Use of Animals in Research. Academic Press, London.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849880-4.00009-X

Hakui, Y. (2010) How the new course guidelines address raising school animals. Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association 63: 150-151. (in Japanese)

Kang, M., Long, T, Chang, C., Meng, T., Ma, H. Li, Z., Li, P., & Chen Y. (2022). A review of the ethical use of animals in functional experimental research in China based on the Four R” principles of reduction, replacement, refinement and responsibility. Medical Science Monitor.

https://doi:10.12659/MSM.938807

Koplin, J. (2022). Can we justify ethically harming animals for research? The Conversation https://theconversation.com/can-we-ethically-justify-harming-animals-for-research-196387 (accessed 27 May 2023).

Morton, R., Hebart, M. L., Ankeny, R. A., & Whittaker, A. L. (2022). An investigation into ‘community expectations’ surrounding animal welfare law enforcement in Australia. Frontiers in Animal Science 3. DOI=10.3389/fanim.2022.991042. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2022.991042 (accessed 27 May 2023).

NACLAR National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research (2004). Guidelines on the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. Singapore. http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/Research2/Grants%20Handbook/NACLARguide% 20Lines.pdf (accessed 20 Feb 2023).

Nanyang Technological University (2023). Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee – Guidelines. https://www.ntu.edu.sg/research/research-integrity-office/institutional-animal-care-and-use-committee/guidelines (accessed 26 Feb 2023).

NHMRC (2013). Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. NHMRC, Canberra. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-code-care-and-use-animals-scientific-purposes (accessed 10 Jan 2023).

PAWS The Philippine Animal Welfare Society (2023). Revised implementing rules and regulations of Republic Act 8485 otherwise known as (The Animal Welfare Act of 1998) as amended by Republic Act 10631. https://paws.org.ph/downloads/3.IRR%20of%20RA%208485%20as%20amended%20by%20RA%2010631.pdf (accessed 25 Feb 2023).

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India (2023). Animals in education and training. https://www.petaindia.com/issues/animals-experimentation/animals-in-education-and-training/ (accessed 21 Feb 2023).

Qadri, S. S. Y. H., & Ramachandra, S. G. (2018). Laws, regulations, and guidelines governing research animal care and use in India. Pp 237 – 262 in Guillén, J. (ed). Laboratory Animals. Regulations and Recommendations for the Care and Use of Animals in Research. (op. cit.)

Rocklinsberg, H., Gjerris, M., & Olsson, A. S. (2017). Animal Ethics in Animal Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108354882.002

Retnam, L., Chatikavanij, P., Kunjara, P., Paramastri, Y. A., Goh, Y. M., Hussein, F. N., Mutalib, A. R., & Poosala, S. (2016). Laws, regulations, guidelines and standards for animal care and use for scientific purposes in the countries of Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and India. ILAR Journal, 57, 312 – 323. https://doi: 10,1093/ilar/ilw038

Turner, P., & Barbee, R. W. (2020). Responsible science and research animal use. ILAR journal 60(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilz020

Understanding Animal Research (2023). Concordat on openness on animal research in the UK. https://concordatopenness.org.uk/ (accessed 27 May 2023).

Universiti Malaysia Sabah (2015) Researcher’s Guidelines on Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. https://www.ums.edu.my/ppp/files/E1.3-Pekeliling-TNCPI-201502---Researchers-Guidelines-on-Code-of-Practise-for-the-cara--use-of-animals.pdf (accessed 12 Jan 2023).

Wallis, R., & Katayama, N. (2022). Using live animals in Biology teaching and research – a comparison between Australia and Japan. Asian Journal of Biology Education, 14, 8 – 16. https://doi.org/10.57443/ajbe.14.0_8

Downloads

Published

2023-06-16

Issue

Section

Bioethics Strengthening