The application of blended learning with rADI model to improve argumentation skills and concept mastery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i3.25416Keywords:
argumentation skills, blended learning, concept mastery, rADI modelAbstract
Post-pandemic policies encourage teachers and students to carry out learning in offline, where they used to go online before. One learning strategy that can be applied in this condition is blended learning, which combines the advantages of offline and online learning. In improving the quality of learning outcomes and developing students' 21st-century skills, especially argumentation skills, blended learning strategies can be combined with inquiry-based learning models, one of which is the revised Argument-Driven Inquiry (rADI). This study aims to obtain an analysis of data related to the application of blended learning with rADI model in improving students' argumentation skills and concept mastery in Monera materials, especially regarding Bacteria. The research method used in this study was pre-experimental with a one-group pretest-posttest design. This research was conducted on students of class X MIPA at a high school in Bandung which consisted of 26 students. The data were obtained from the pre-test and post-test results of argumentation skills and concept mastery, and questionnaires on students' responses to learning. The results showed an increase in students’ argumentation skills with an N-Gain score of 0.81 and students’ concept mastery with an N-Gain score of 0.78 after applying blended learning with rADI model. The increase in argumentation skills and concept mastery was significant with N-Gain scores included in the high category. In addition, students' response data showed a good response to the application of blended learning with rADI model.
Downloads
References
Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Al Refaai, I. K., Bader Eddin, E. A., & Aziz Al-Rahman, F. H. (2013). EFL students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment: Advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p95.
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (2 ed.). PT. Bumi Aksara. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Dasar_Dasar_Evaluasi_Pendidikan_Edisi_3.html?id=j5EmEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Astira, S., Sajidan, & Dwiastuti, S. (2019). Analysis of argumentation skills in biological learning in senior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1338(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1338/1/012032.
Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701411567
Damhuri et al. (2014). Upaya meningkatkan penguasaan konsep mata pelajaran biologi dan matematika berbasis lesson study. Seminar Nasional XI Pendidikan FKIP UNS. Universitas Sebelas Maret. https://www.neliti.com/publications/173540/upaya-meningkatkan-penguasaaan-konsep-mata-pelajaran-biologi-dan-matematika-berb#cite
Divena, M. S., Hamdiyati, Y., & Aryani, A. (2021). Effectiveness of argument-driven inquiry (ADI) on students’ concept mastery and argumentation skills in reproductive system. Biosfer, 14(2), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.20513
Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan kemampuan penalaran dengan keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada konsep sistem pencernaan melalui PBL (Problem Based Learning). Biodidaktika, Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v13i2.3677.
Ermi, N. (2015). Penggunaan metode diskusi untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar materi perubahan sosial pada siswa kelas XII SMA Negeri 4 Pekanbaru. Sorot, 10(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.31258/sorot.10.2.3212.
Fatkhulloh, S., & Haryanto. (2020). Can blended learning replace conventional learning in terms of mastery learning and cognitive attainment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012025.
Febriansyah, A. (2022) . Penerapan blended learning model problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan memecahkan masalah dan berpikir kreatif siswa sma pada materi lingkungan. [Skripsi]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. http://repository.upi.edu/77560/
Febrina, A. (2012) . Penerapan model pembelajaran revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi dan penguasaan konsep pencemaran lingkungan siswa SMA melalui strategi online learning [Skripsi]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. http://repository.upi.edu/64447/
Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2013). Argumentation and debate. Cengage Learning. https://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132303692/pendidikan/__Argumentation_and_Debate__Critical_Thinking_for_Reasoned_Decision_Making.pdf
Hadiyanto, H., Failasofah, F., Armiwati, A., Abrar, M., & Thabran, Y. (2021). Students’ practices of 21st century skills between conventional learning and blended learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.3.7.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Dept. of Physics, Indiana University. https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v1.i1.a10
Hasan, A. M. (2022). Penerapan blended learning berbasis pendidikan karakter di sekolah dasar. Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 2(2), 50-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.51454/decode.v2i2.4
Herlanti et al. (2012). Kualitas Argumentasi pada diskusi isu sosiosaintifik mikrobiologi melalui weblog. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 1(2):168-177. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/article/view/2135
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Using blended learning evidence-based practices (Vol.20). Singapore: Springer. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/41587/1/614.Khe%20Foon%20Hew.pdf
Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8
Lahadisi. (2014). Inkuiri: Sebuah strategi menuju pembelajaran bermakna. Jurnal Al-Ta’dib. 7(2): 85-98. https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/al-tadib/article/view/319
Lin, S. S., & Mintzes, J. J. (2010). Learning argumentation skills through instruction in socioscientific issues: The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 993-1017. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10763-010-9215-6.
Llewellyn, D. (2013). Teaching high school science through inquiry and argumentation. London: SAGE Publications. https://dokumen.pub/teaching-high-school-science-through-inquiry-and-argumentation-2nbsped-1452244456-9781452244457.html
Maisari & Pranoto. (2021). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada materi monera. Biology Education Science & Technology. 4(2):87-100. https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/best/article/view/4322
Nasution, N., Jalinus, N., & Syahril, S . (2019). Buku model blended learning. Padang: Unilak Press. http://repository.unp.ac.id/id/eprint/26576
Puspitarini, D. (2022). Blended Learning sebagai model pembelajaran abad 21.Ide Guru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru. 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v7i1.307
Riyanti, V. (2022). Pengaruh Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) terhadap keterampilan argumentasi dan penguasaan konsep siswa pada materi sistem ekskresi manusia. [Skripsi]. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. http://repository.upi.edu/76919/
Sari, I.P. (2018). Analisis keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah siswa kelas XI IPA menggunakan model Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) dengan penerapan metode problem solving. [Skripsi]. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Batusangkar. http://repo.iainbatusangkar.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12834
Sugiyono. (2007). Statistika untuk penelitian (E. Mulyatiningsih, Ed.). Bandung:Alfabeta. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=509888
Suprabhan, K; & Subramonian, G. (2015). Blended learning approach for enhancing students. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology. 11(4), 1–8. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098578
Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry ( rADI ) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education. 5(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x
Wijiastuti, T. N., & Nurhayati, S. (2021). Effectiveness of discovery blended learning on concept understanding and student motivation. Research Horizon, 1(4), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.1.4.2021.150-156
Zeidler, D. L., Florida, S., Nichols, B. H., & Florida, S. (2009). Socioscientific issues : Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education. 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
