Study of students' argumentation ability through scientific approach in high schools with different accreditation ratings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i3.26497Keywords:
argumentation ability, different accreditation ratings, structure and cell function materialAbstract
This study aimed to determine differences in students' argumentation abilities on the subject matter of cell structure and function through a scientific approach in high schools with different accreditation ratings. The research design used is ex post facto. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, with a total sample of 111 students consisting of high school students accredited A, namely Seputih State High School 1 Surabaya, high school students accredited B, namely Senior High School Bangun Cipta and high school students accredited C, namely Senior High School Miftahul Ulum. Research data in the form of test results describing argumentation skills were analyzed using the Anova and LSD tests at a significant level of 5%, student questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively in the form of percentages, data from teacher interviews and documentation studies were analyzed descriptively qualitatively using Miles and Huberman's model. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the ability to argue between high school students accredited A and B and C (sig. p<0.05). The argumentative abilities of senior high school students accredited B were not significantly different from senior high school students accredited C (sig. p> 0.05). The average argumentation ability of students from senior high school accredited A is higher than school accredited B and C, but most of the student scores from the senior high schools are still in the "very poor" category. Senior high school students accredited A, B and C are already able to make claims, but the grounds, warrants and backings given are not relevant to the claim. This is due to the application of learning that does not direct students to argue, the application of a scientific approach that is not optimal, and the characteristics of students’.
Downloads
References
Ambarawati, D. S. H. E., Muslim, M., & Hernani, H. (2021). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi siswa SMP pada materi pencemaran lingkungan. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v10i1.29780
Angraini, G., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa SMAN kelas x di kota solok pada konten biologi . Journal of Education Informatic Technology and Science (JeITS), 1(1), 114–124. https://ejurnal.umri.ac.id/index.php/JeITS/article/view/1242/742
Anwar, Y., Susanti, R., & Ermayanti. (2019). Analyzing scientific argumentation skills of biology education students in general biology courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166, 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012001
Budiyono, A. (2020). Analisis korelasi kemampuan memahami dengan kemampuan berargumentasi siswa melalui model pembelajaran argument based science inquiry. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2020.10.1.4539
Devi, N. D. C., Susanti VH, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of high school students’ argumentation ability in the topic of buffer solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v3i3.23308
Dewantari, T., Hasnunidah, N., & Maulina, D. (2022). Kajian kemampuan argumentasi siswa pada materi pokok animalia melalui pendekatan saintifik di SMA dengan peringkat akreditasi yang berbeda. BIOEDUSAINS:Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 5(1), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v5i1.3285
Dwiretno, G., & Setyarsih, W. (2018). Pembelajaran fisika menggunakan model argument driven inquiry (adi) untuk melatihkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v7n2p
Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim. (2015). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559
Handayani, P., Murniati, & Sardianto. (2015). Analisis argumentasi peserta didik kelas X SMA muhammadiyah 1 palembang dengan menggunakan model argumentasi toulmin. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v2i1.2355
Hasnunidah, N., Rosidin, U., & Kadaritna, N. (2018). Pendekatan saintifik dan permasalahan pembelajarannya pada mata pelajaran IPA SMP di kota Bandar Lampung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi. https://jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/SemnasBIO/article/view/681/628
Hazeltine, C. (2011). Toulmin Argumentation Rubric (pp. 1–1). https://www.ccusd93.org/cms/lib/AZ02204140/Centricity/Domain/1089/Toulmin%20Rubric.pdf
Indrawati, K. A. D., & Febrilia, B. R. A. (2019). Pola argumentasi siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal sistem persamaan linear tiga variabel (SPLTV). FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.5.2.141-154
Jiminez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A.B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
Karlina, G., & Alberida, H. (2021). Kemampuan argumentasi pada pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v5i1.31621
Kim, H., & Song, J. (2006). The features of peer argumentation in middle school students’ scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9005-2
Mahardika, A.I., Fitriah, & Zainudin. (2015). Keterampilan berargumentasi ilmiah pada pembelajaran fisika melalui model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Vidya Karya 1, 7, 755–762. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id//handle/123456789/18342
Mairing, J. P. (2016). Math problems solving ability of eighth grade students based on the accreditation level. Jurnal Kependidikan, 46(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jk.v46i2.9655
Marhamah, O. S., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry (ADI) dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berargumentasi siswa pada konsep pencemaran lingkungan di kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(02), 45. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v9i02.747
Minianur, D., Suyanto, S., & Nurcahyo, H. (2017). Increasing motivation and cognitive learning by means of a scientific approach in cell and tissue biology for students of grade X Aptr-2 In SMK Negeri 1 Pandak In 2016/2017. Jurnal Prodi Pendidikan Biologi, 6(4), 225–236.
Mubarok, O. S., Muslim, & Danawan, A. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah dengan pendekatan saintifik terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMA pada materi pengukuran. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS), 381–388. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.sc.id/index.php/snps/article/view/9862/7292
Okumus, S., & Unal, S. (2012). The effects of argumentation model on students’ achievement and argumentation skills in science. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.141
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Permendiknas. (2007). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana. Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi. http://ditpsd.kemendikbud.go.id/upload/filemanager/2020/10/lampiran%20Permen%2024%202007%20Standar%20Sarana%20Prasarana.pdf
Pitorini, D. E., Suciati, S., & Ariyanto, J. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi siswa: perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog socrates. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.27761
Rahman, A. (2021). Argumentative skill: sebuah hasil dari proses pembelajaran melalui model inquiry pada siswa madrasah aliyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Undiksha, 8(3), 110–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jjpg.v8i3.28006
Ramadanti, V. (2022). Analisis kesulitan belajar peserta didik pada materi sel kelas XI [Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/60951/1/11170161000060_Vidia%20Ramadanti%20%28watermark%29.pdf
Rhosalia, L. A. (2017). Pendekatan saintifik (scientific approach) dalam pembelajaran tematik terpadu kurikulum 2013 versi 2016. JTIEE (Journal of Teaching in Elementary Education), 1(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.30587/jtiee.v1i1.112
Safahi, L., Akbar, B., Selvianah, A., Astuti, Y., & Anugrah, D. (2019). Perbedaan keterampilan proses sains biologi siswa sekolah menengah atas berdasarkan tingkat akreditas sekolah. BIOEDUSCIENCE: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 3(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.29405/j.bes/32106-1113651
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
Siregar, N., & Pakpahan, R. A. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi IPA siswa melalui pembelajaran argumentasi driven inquiry (ADI). LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i2.113
Siswanto., Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 10(2), 104–116. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPFI/article/view/3347/3318
Sitirahayu, S., & Purnomo, H. (2021). Pengaruh sarana belajar terhadap prestasi belajar siswa sekolah dasar. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v4i3.242
Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x
Suwono, H., Yulianingrum, E., & Sulisetijono, S. (2017). Peningkatan argumentasi ilmiah siswa sekolah menengah atas melalui model pembelajaran ESAR (Engage, Study, Activate, Reflect). Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v23i1
Syaidah, U., Suyadi, B., & Ani, H. M. (2018). Pengaruh kompetensi guru terhadap hasil belajar ekonomi di SMA Negeri Rambipuji Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EKONOMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial, 12(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpe.v12i2.8316
Waluyo, E., Naparin, A., & Arsyad, S. W. (2021, July). Hubungan latar belakang pendidikan guru IPA SMPN dengan kemampuan mengelola kelas di kabupaten Hulu Sungkai Selatan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA. https://jbse.ulm.ac.id/index.php/PMPIPA/article/download/31/45
Zulainy, F., Rusdi, R., & Marzal, J. (2021). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis realistic mathematics education untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 812–828. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.440
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
