Reinforcement analyze and evaluate of higher-order thinking skills using problem-based learning in ecosystem material
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i3.28604Keywords:
Ecosystem, higher-order thinking skills, problem-based learningAbstract
Higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) is one of the skills needed for 21st century challenges, especially for students. The aim of this study was to describe HOTS in students, especially the cognitive domain of analyzing and evaluating. This is a descriptive quantitative study employing a Pretest-Posttest One Group research design. The experiment was limited to 34 students heterogeneously from class X-C SMAN 1 Nglames. The research instruments used include learning observation sheets and posttests for student academic score also analyze and evaluate skills. The findings revealed that the average of analyze and evaluate of HOTS Completeness was 79.40% with a good category. The classical completeness of students in learning was 82.35% with a very complete category. Thus, the problem-based learning model can reinforce students' analysis(C4) and evaluate(C5) in higher order thinking skills of ecosystem material.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, S., Prahmana, R. C. I., Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Arianil, Y., & Zainil, M. (2018). The instruments of higher order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012053
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (1st ed.). Longman. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235465787_A_Taxonomy_for_Learning_Teaching_and_Assessing_A_Revision_of_Bloom’s_Taxonomy_of_Educational_Objectives
Andriani, R., & Rasto, R. (2019). Motivasi belajar sebagai determinan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 4(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v4i1.14958
Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Avvisati, F., Echazarra, A., Givord, P., & Schwabe, M. (2018). Programme for international student assessment (PISA). In OECD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_69
Bayley, S. H. (2022). Learning for adaptation and 21st-century skills: Evidence of pupils’ flexibility in Rwandan primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 93(June), 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102642
Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.18200/jgedc.2015214253
Carson, S. H. (2019). Creativity and mental illness. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity: Second Edition (pp. 297–318). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.016
Dewi, N. W. I. S., Suarsana, I. M., & Suryawan, I. P. P. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kolaboratif berbantuan masalah autentik terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Matematika, Sains, Dan Pembelajarannya, 12(1), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v12i1.13828
Dini, M., Wijaya, T. T., & Sugandi, A. I. (2018). Pengaruh self confidence terhadap kemampuan pemahaman matematik siswa SMP. JURNAL SILOGISME : Kajian Ilmu Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24269/js.v3i1.936
Ellis, D., & Boyd, W. E. (2014). Procedural skills, sketchUp and vodcasting: Distance teaching of design drawing skills and student learning autonomy. Creative Education, 05(12), 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.512125
Facione, P. A. (2020). Advancing thingking worldwide. In Insight assessment: Vol. XXVIII (Issue 1). http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/what&why2007.pd%0Ahttp://www.eduteka.org/PensamientoCriticoFacione.php
Fink, A., & Benedek, M. (2021). The neuroscience of creativity. Neuroforum, 25(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1515/nf-2019-0006
Forgeard, M. (2021). Creativity and healing. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 319–332). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.017
Herman, H., Rahim, A. R., & Syamsuri, A. S. (2021). Analisis Instrumen Tes Hasil Belajar Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots). Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(3), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i3.65
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
Jaenudin, R., Chotimah, U., Farida, F., & Syarifuddin, S. (2020). Student development zone: higher order thinking skills (Hots) in critical thinking orientation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(9), 11. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i9.1884
Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to the test...or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9
Karmila, W., Achmad, S., & Utami, U. (2023). High-Order questions improve students’ critical thinking skills in elementary schools. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.61607
Leite, M., Infante, V., & Andrade, A. R. (2022). Using expert judgement techniques to assess reliability for long service-life components: An application to railway wheelsets. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 236(5), 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X211034650
Lu, K., Yang, H. H., Shi, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00238-7
Lukitasari, W., Handhika, J., & Murtafiah, W. (2018). Higher order thinking skills: Using e-portfolio in project-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012047
McMurry, B., Williams, D. D., & Rich, P. (2016). An Evaluation framework for CALL. Tesl-Ej, 20(2), 1–13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1113897.pdf
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). International Results in Reading. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580353.pdf
Nurrohmah, I., Sensuse, D. I., & Santoso, H. B. (2018). The expert-judgement validation and finalization of proposed interaction design process maturity instrument: Case study: E-commerce in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2017, 2018-Janua, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2017.8280647
Octoria, D., Sudiyanto, Witurachmi, S., & Wardana, D. K. (2016). The implementation of bloom’s taxonomy in the assessment instrument for economics learning to improve the students’ cognitive competence. Proceeding The 2ad International Conference on Teacher Training and Education Sebelas Maret University, 2(1), 655–665. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ictte/article/view/7226
Phang, F. A., Yusof, K. M., Aziz, A. A., Nawi, N. D., & Musa, A. N. (2018). Cooperative problem-based learning to develop 21st century skills among secondary school students through STEM Education. Proceedings - 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum, WEEF 2017- In Conjunction with: 7th Regional Conference on Engineering Education and Research in Higher Education 2017, RCEE and RHEd 2017, 1st International STEAM Education Conference, STEAMEC 201, November, 405–409. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467122
Purbaningrum, K. A. (2017). Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa smp dalam pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya belajar. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 10(2), 40–49. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/JPPM/article/view/2029
Putra, I. G. D., Sujana, I. W., & Wiyasana, I. K. N. (2020). Hasil belajar IPS menggunakan kolaborasi model discovery learning berbasis media animasi. Journal of Education Technology, 4(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i2.25099
Saputri, D. A., & Febriani, S. (2017). Pengaruh model problem based learning(Pbl) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik pada mata pelajaran biologi materi pencemaran lingkungan kelas X MIA SMAN 6 Bandar Lampung. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 8(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosf.v8i1.1262
Setiawaty, B. T., Sunarno, W., & Sugiyarto, S. (2019). Profil kemampuan berpikir analisis siswa sekolah menengah pertama di Surakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 234–238. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/12840
Somatanaya, A. G., & Nugraha, D. A. (2018). Pemetaan high order thingking (Hot) matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama se-kota Tasikmalaya. TEOREMA : Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 3(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v3i2.1170
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta. https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?q=Sugiyono.+2013.+Metode+Penelitian+Kuantitatif,+Kualitatif+dan+R%26D.+Bandung:+Penerbit+Alfabeta.&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
Ulger, K. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on the creative thinking and critical thinking disposition of students in visual arts education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1649
Varenina, L., Vecherinina, E., Shchedrina, E., Valiev, I., & Islamov, A. (2021). Developing critical thinking skills in a digital educational environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100906
Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Penilaian hasil pembelajaran di sekolah. Pustaka Pelajar. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=vB0UsJsAAAAJ&citation_for_view=vB0UsJsAAAAJ:-f6ydRqryjwC
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and krathwohl bloom’s taxonomy revised understanding the new version of bloom’s taxonomy. In The Second Principle (pp. 1–8). https://quincycollege.edu/content/uploads/Anderson-and-Krathwohl_Revised-Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf%0Ahttps://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cognitive-taxonomy-revised/%0Ahttp://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cog
Yulianto, T., Pramudya, İ., & Slamet, İ. (2019). Effects of the 21st century learning model and problem-based models on higher order thinking skill. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4, 749–755. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.629084
Yusmanto, & Herman. (2016). The Influence of the application of discovery learning model on the improvement of critical thinking ability of mathematics and self confidence of grade V students of primary schools, Eduhumura. Journal of Basic Education, 7(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v7i2.2705
Zohar, A., & Cohen, A. (2016). Large scale implementation of higher order thinking (HOT) in civic education: The interplay of policy, politics, pedagogical leadership and detailed pedagogical planning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
