Interaction of the reflective ethnobiology (REBI) model and creative thinking argumentation in biodiversity material
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i3.29279Keywords:
Reflective Model, Ethnobiology Learning, Creative Thinking, argumentationAbstract
The ethnoscience-based reflective learning model has been implemented in the classroom while the learning process has its own strengths and weaknesses. The purpose of this study was to determine the interaction between learning models and arguments for creative thinking. A mixed methods research design was applied to collect both qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative data were collected using argumentation observations and essay tests which were analyzed with SPSS. Qualitative data sourced from one lecturer and 40 students of National Islamic Institute of Kerinci, Jambi Province were collected using interviews and observations. The results shows that there is an interaction between learning models and arguments for creative thinking. This can be seen from the whole learning process students have achieved indicators of creative thinking involving argumentation skills. We discussed this and formulated recommendations that can be implemented in the future.
Downloads
References
Alden, K., Andrews, P. S., Polack, F. A. C., Veiga-Fernandes, H., Coles, M. C., & Timmis, J. (2015). Using argument notation to engineer biological simulations with increased confidence. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12(104). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.1059
Almeida, L. S., Prieto, L., Fernando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrandiz, C. (2008). Torrance test of creative thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 195-199. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003
Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 21–39. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1239945
Arina, N., & Rustiadi, S. (2018). Cooperation, collaboration, and co-creation: A review of existing literature and applications. International Journal of Family Business Practices, 1(2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.33021/ijfbp.v1i2.639
Bahru, T., Asfaw, Z., & Demissew, S. (2011). Variation of indigenous botanical knowledge versus social characteristics between the Afar and Oromo nations in and around the semi-arid Awash national park , Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(1), 75–90. https://journals.ju.edu.et/index.php/ejast/article/view/825
Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspective. In Post Pressed. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Bain-3/publication /43505901_Reflecting_on_Practice_Student_Teacher
Baptista, G. C. S., & El-Hani, C. N. (2009). The contribution of ethnobiology to the construction of a dialogue between ways of knowing: A case study in a Brazilian Public High School. Science and Education, 18(3–4), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9173-3
Barrero, C. E. A., & Sánchez, H. C. R. (2018). Confronting neoliberalism in colombia: Art and collaboration in a hospital in ruins. Etnografica, 22(3), 575–603. https://doi.org/10.4000/etno gra
Brown, K. W., Cozby, P. C., Kee, D. W., & Worden, P. E. (1999). Research methods in human development, 2nd ed. In Research methods in human development (2nd ed.). Mayfield Publishing Company. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-06006-000
Bubnys, R., & Žydžiūnaitė, V. (2010). Reflective learning models in the context of higher education: Concept analysis. Problems of Education in The 21st Century, 20, 58–70. https://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/files/pdf/vol20/58-70.Bubnys_Vol.20.pdf
Carugati, F., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). Learning and instruction: Social-cognitive perspectives (J. D. B. T.-I. E. of the S. & B. S. (Second E. Wright (ed.); pp. 670–676). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92035-X
da Silva, C., Pereira, F., & Amorim, J. P. (2023). The integration of indigenous knowledge in school: a systematic review. Compare, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2184 200
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. (2013). Introducing high school biology students to argumentation about socioscientific issues. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(4), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.845322
Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2022). Developing students’ critical thinking skills and argumentation abilities through augmented reality-based argumentation activities in science classes. Science & Education, 32, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5
Diawati, C., Setiabudi, A., Liliasari, & Buchari. (2017). Development and validation of creative thinking skills test in the project of laboratory apparatus modification. Ideas for 21st Century Education, August, 229–231. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166575-46
Eduardo, J. P., & Gabriel, A. G. (2021). Indigenous peoples and the right to education: The Dumagat experience in the Provinces of Nueva Ecija and Aurora, in the Philippines. SAGE Open, 11(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211009491
Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2018). A critical review of scientific argumentation in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353
Fedele, G., Donatti, C. I., Bornacelly, I., & Hole, D. G. (2021). Nature-dependent people: Mapping human direct use of nature for basic needs across the tropics. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102368
Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The global creativity indeks 2015. Martin Prosperity Institute. http://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/mpi/content/the-global-creativity-index-2015/
Ganjari, L. E. (2020). Studi Etnobiologi Tanaman Padi. Widya Warta, 2(2), 205–218. http://portal.widyamandala.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/warta/article/view/980
Gómez-Márquez, J. (2021). What is life? Molecular Biology Reports, 48(8), 6223–6230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06594-5
Grumney, E. (2022). Argumentation in the science classroom. Learning to Teach Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Through Research and Practice, 11(1). https://openjournals.utoledo.edu/index.php/learningtoteach/article/view/576
Gültepe, N., & Kılıç, Z. (2021). The effects of scientific argumentation on high school students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(6), 183–200. https://doi.org/ 10.29329/ijpe.2021.382.13
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Schulz, R. M. (2019). Engaging students in science: The potential role of “Narrative thinking” and “Romantic understanding.” Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/feduc.2019.00038
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2019). The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.6
Hayes, A. M., & Bulat, J. (2017). Disabilities inclusive education systems and policies guide for low- and middle-income countries (Issue July). RTI Press. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2017. op.0043.1707
Hester, S. D., Nadler, M., Katcher, J., Elfring, L. K., Dykstra, E., Rezende, L., & Bolger, M. S. (2018). Authentic inquiry through modeling in biology (AIM-Bio): An introductory laboratory curriculum that increases undergraduates’ scientific agency and skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(ar63), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-06-0090
Hoskinson, A.-M., Caballero, M. D., & Knight, J. K. (2013). How can we improve problem solving in undergraduate biology? Applying lessons from 30 years of physics education research. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-09-0149
Iyai, D. A., Murwanto, A. G., & Killian, A. M. (2011). Hunting and ethnozoology systems of monitor lizards (Fam. Varanidae) utilized by Yaur tribe at National Park of Cenderawasih Gulf. Biota : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Hayati, 16(2), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.24002/biota.v16i2.110
Kazhikenova, G., Zhumataeva, E., Kozhamzharova, М., & Aubakirova, S. (2021). The effectiveness of reflective dialogue in the development of reflective thinking in rising teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100902
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
Krell, M., Garrecht, C., & Minkley, N. (2023). Preservice biology teachers’ socioscientific argumentation: Analyzing structural and content complexity in the context of a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2023, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10364-z
Kundariati, M., Maghfiroh, L., Indriwati, S. E., Rohman, F., & Priambodo, B. (2022). Revealing the effect of local-based teaching materials toward scientific reasoning, argumentation, and problem-solving in biology classroom. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i3.21973
Landrieu, Y., De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & De Wever, B. (2023). Argumentation in collaboration: The impact of explicit instruction and collaborative writing on secondary school students’ argumentative writing. Reading and Writing, 12(May), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10439-x
Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431 4558490
Martin, J.-L., Maris, V., & Simberloff, D. S. (2016). The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22), 6105–6112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525003113
Megawan, M., & Istiyono, E. (2019). Physics creative thinking measurement using two-tier multiple choice to support science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012068
Meiarti, D., Wiyanto, & Yulianti, I. (2020). Analysis of creative thinking skill and student learning interest through mind mapping based creative problem-solving learning model. Physics Communication, 4(37), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v4i1.23846
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2013). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968
Mermelstein, A. D. (2018). Reflective teaching as a form of professional development. Mextesol Journal, 42(4). https://mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_article=4433
Mosley, A., & Baltazar, E. (2019). An introduction to logic: From everyday life to formal systems. Smith College. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context= textbooks
Mourão, J. S., Araujo, H. F. P., & Almeida, F. S. (2006). Ethnotaxonomy of mastofauna as practised by hunters of the municipality of Paulista, state of Paraíba-Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-19
Muhali, M., Asy’ari, M., & Sukaisih, R. (2020). Upaya membelajarkan peserta didik menjadi pebelajar reflektif. Jurnal Ilmiah IKIP Mataram, 7(1), 58–70. https://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/j iim/article/view/3291
Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Rineka Cipta. http://ucs.sulsellib. net//index.php?p=show_detail&id=94913
Nahdi, M. S. (2018). Improving research and biological teaching based on local wisdom (ethnobiology). In S. Yamtinah (Ed.), Isu Sosio-Saintifik: Inovasi Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 (pp. 17–21). Universitas Sebelas Maret. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/ 31915/1/MAIZER%20SAID%20NAHDI%20-%20Peningkatan%20Penel itian%20dan%20Pe mbelajaran%20Biologi%20Berbasis%20Kearifan%20Masyarakat%20(Etnobiologi)%20=%20Improving%20research%20and%20biological%20teaching%20based%20on%20local%20wisdom%20(ethno.pdf
Nappo, F., Cangiotti, N., & Sisti, C. (2023). Confirming mathematical conjectures by analogy. Erkenntnis, 0(0), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00683-6
Nasimova, Z., Mukumov, I. U., & Tashpulatov, Y. S. (2023). Anti-Ecology of the “ Lavon ” Lily Variety in Different Growing Conditions of the Samarkand Region , Uzbekistan. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 14, 968–975. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2023.148065
Nur, F. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar matematika kelas VII SMP berdasarkan model pembelajaran Kolb-Knisley berbantuan geogebra sebagai upaya meningkatkan higher …. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2017v5n1a7
Nuswowati, M., & Taufiq, M. (2015). Developing creative thinking skills and creative attitude through problem based green vision chemistry environment learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i2.4187
Opdal, P. A. (2022). To do or to listen? Student active learning vs. the lecture. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 41(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-021-09796-3
Orr, Y., Lansing, J. S., & Dove, M. R. (2015). Environmental anthropology: Systemic perspectives. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014159
Pang, N. S. K. (2022). Teachers’ reflective practices in implementing assessment for learning skills in classroom teaching. ECNU Review of Education, 5(3), 470–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2096531120936290
Pease, A., Aberdein, A., & Martin, U. (2019). Explanation in mathematical conversations: An empirical investigation. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 377(2140), 20180159. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0159
Ping, I. L. L., Halim, L., & Osman, K. (2020). Explicit teaching of scientific argumentation as an approach in developing argumentation skills, science process skills and biology understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.33225 /jbse/20.19.276
Pitrou, P. (2015). An anthropology beyond nature and-culture-Tim Ingold and Gilsi Palsson. Somatosphere: Science, Medicine, and Anthtropology, 2015, 1–13. https://hal.science/hal-03131148
Probosari, R. M., Sajidan, S., Suranto, S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2022). Integrating reading as evidence to enhance argumentation in scientific reading-based inquiry: A design-based research in biology classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10. 15294/jpii.v11i1.29350
Purwati, R., Suranto, S., Sajidan, S., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Analysis of argumentation skills in biology learning at Surakarta Senior High School. International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-3-2019.2284903
Putri, M. D., & Rusdiana, D. (2017). Identifying students’ scientific argumentation skill at Junior High School 1 Argamakmur, North Bengkulu. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, III(9), 556–572. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370424
Rahayu, W. E., & Sudarmin. (2015). Pengembangan modul IPA terpadu berbasis etnosains tema energi dalam kehidupan untuk menanamkan jiwa konservasi siswa. Unnes Science Education Journal, 4(2), 919–926. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v4i2.7943
Reiss, J., & Sprenger, J. (2014). Scientific objectivity (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity/
Rist, S., & Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2006). Ethnosciences - A step towards the integration of scientific and indigenous forms of knowledge in the management of natural resources for the future. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8(4), 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10 668-006-9050-7
Santoro, F. R., Nascimento, A. L. B., Soldati, G. T., Ferreira Júnior, W. S., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2018). Evolutionary ethnobiology and cultural evolution: opportunities for research and dialog. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 14(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0199-y
Sasmita, Z. A. G., Widodo, W., & Indana, S. (2021). Contextual based learning media development to train creative thinking skill in primary school. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(4), 468–476. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i4.124
Savoirs, N. (2021). Human-environment relationships in Siberia and Northeast China . Knowledge , rituals , mobility and politics among the Tungus peoples , followed by Varia (Issue July). https://doi.org/10.4000/emscat.2984
Saxena, A., & Behari, A. (2021). ‘Engaging in an argumentative discourse’- narratives from biology classrooms. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 14–32. https://d oi.org/10.30935/scimath/9418
Schen, M. (2013). A comparison of biology majors written arguments across the curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 47(4), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.788542
Schleigh, S. (2015). Scientific argumentation in biology: 30 classroom activities. In Scientific Argumentation in Biology: 30 Classroom Activities. https://doi.org/10.2505/9781936137275
Sellars, M., Fakirmohammad, R., Bui, L., Fishetti, J., Niyozov, S., Reynolds, R., Thapliyal, N., Liu-Smith, Y.-L., & Ali, N. (2018). Conversations on critical thinking: Can critical thinking find its way forward as the skill set and mindset of the century? In Education Sciences (Vol. 8, Issue 4, p. 205). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040205
Simion, M. (2022). The epistemic normativity of conjecture. Philosophical Studies, 179(11), 3447–3471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-022-01829-y
Song, Y., Deane, P., & Fowles, M. (2017). Examining students’ ability to critique arguments and exploring the implications for assessment and instruction. ETS Research Report Series, 2017(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12166
Sumartias, S., Unde, A. A., Wibisana, I. P., & Nugraha, A. R. (2020). The importance of local wisdom in building national character in the industrial age 4.0. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 397(Icliqe 2019), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k .200129.159
Throsby, D., & Petetskaya, E. (2016). Sustainability concepts in indigenous and non-indigenous cultures. International Journal of Cultural Property, 23(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0940739116000084
Torrance, E. P. (2018). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Interpretive manual. Scholastic Testing Service, Inc. https://www.ststesting.com/gift/TTCT_InterpMOD.2018.pdf
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambrige University Press. https://www.cambridge. org/core/books/uses-of-argument/26CF801BC12004587B66778297 D5567C.
Vieira, R. D., Melo, V. F. de, Avraamidou, L., & Lobato, J. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing scientific literacy: The role of students’ epistemological profiles. Education Sciences, 7(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020047
Volbers, J. (2012). Wittgenstein, Dewey, and the practical foundation of knowledge. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, IV(2), 0–14. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap. 724
Walsh, R. (2015). What is wisdom? Cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary syntheses. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000045
Wang, J., Seyler, B. C., Ticktin, T., Zeng, Y., & Ezhu, Z. (2019). Indigenous botanical nomenclature used by the Yi people in Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China. Economic Botany, 73(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-019-09461-4
Wolverton, S., Nolan, J. M., & Ahmed, W. (2014). Ethnobiology, political ecology, and conservation. Journal of Ethnobiology, 34(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-34.2.125
Zhang, J. (2019). Educational diversity and ethnic cultural heritage in the process of globalization. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41 257-019-0022-x
Zidny, R, Solfarina, S., Aisyah, R. S. S., & Eilks, I. (2021). Exploring indigenous science to identify contents and contexts for science learning in order to promote education for sustainable development. Education Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030114
Zidny, Robby, Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science and Education, 29(1), 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
