Promoting student’s habits of mind and cognitive learning outcomes in science education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31840Keywords:
biology, blended learning, cognitive learning outcome, habits of mind, process oriented guided inquiry learningAbstract
: Learning must be able to develop knowledge, skills, and mindsets so that the graduates produced have attitudes, abilities and knowledge that are integrated and skilled in life. One way to achieve learning can be done through habits of mind because the success of learning is strongly influenced by habits of mind. The purpose of this study is to as certain how habits of mind and cognitive learning outcomes in biology are affected by learning process oriented guided inquiry learning with blended learning support. A pretest-postest design wih a non-equivalent control group was employed in this study. The trial ran from February to June 2022. Utilizing the habits of mind questionnaire, pupils’ thought patterns were assessed. Essay tests are also used to evaluate the results of cognitive learning. In this study, google form, LMS, and google meet were used for data collection. Statistical Product and Service Solutions software version 23 is used for data analysis and the results of covariance analysis (ANCOVA) showed a p value < 0,005, meaning that POGIL-supported blended learning can empower habits of mind and cognitive learning outcomes in biology learning. There is a substantial difference between the outcomes of the least significant difference and increasing habits of mind and cognitive learning outcomes. As a result, POGIL with moodle support can be used to enhance students’ habits of mind and cognitive learning results in biology classes.
Downloads
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
Adams, C. (2006). Powerpoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600579141
Adom, D., Mensah, J. A., & Dake, D. A. (2020). Test, measurement, and evaluation: Understanding and use of the concepts in education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20457
Alhamlan, S., Aljasser, H., Almajed, A., Almansour, H., & Alahmad, N. (2018). A aystematic review: Using habits of mind to improve student’s thinking in class. Higher Education Studies, 8(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v8n1p25
Almuntasheri, S., Gillies, R. M., & Wright T. (2016). The effectiveness of a guided inquiry-based, teachers’ professional development programme on saudi students’ understanding of density. Science Education International, 27(1), 16–39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1100181.pdf
Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills : Literature review. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 21–39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239945.pdf
Ariyati, E., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Rohman, F. (2020). Habits of mind potency of students of prospective biology teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022048
Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. (2015). Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions in biology majors and nonmajors. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094
Costa, A., & Kaliick, B. (2012). Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16 essential characterisic for succes. Asociation for Supervision and Curriculum Developmnet. https://workmax.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/LearningLeadingWithHabitsOfMind.pdf
Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (2000). Habits of mind: A developmental series. In Habits of Mind. https://repository.bbg.ac.id/bitstream/598/1/Habits_of_Mind_Across_the_Curriculum.pdf
De-Gale, S., & Boisselle, L. N. (2015). The effect of POGIL on academic performance and academic confidence. Science Education International, 26(1), 56–79. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1056455.pdf
García, T., Cueli, M., Rodríguez, C., Krawec, J., & González-Castro, P. (2015). Metacognitive knowledge and skills in students with deep approach to learning. Evidence from mathematical problem solving. Revista de Psicodidactica, 20(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.13060
Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
Gloria, R. Y., Sudarmin, Wiyanto, & Indriyati, D. R. (2017). Formative assessment with stages of understanding by design (UbD) in improving habits of mind. International Journal of Enviromental & Science Education , 11(10), 2233–2242. http://www.ijese.net/makale/1991.html
Hanson, D. M. (2007). Designing process-oriented guided-inquiry activities (Issue January 2007). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238073200_Designing_Process-Oriented_Guided-Inquiry_Activities
Hariyanto, Amin, M., Mahanal, S., & Rohman, F. (2022). Analyzing the contribution of critical thinking skills and social skills on students’ character by applying discovery learning models. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i1.2907
Haryati, S. (2018). The effectiveness of the process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model in educational psychology learning. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(2), 375. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i2.24094
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2019). The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.6
Hayat, M. S., Rustaman, N. Y., Rahmat, A., & Redjeki, S. (2019). The improvement of prospective teachers’ habits of mind during the 5E+ e inquiry learning program in horticulture course. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 14(9), 535–545. http://www.ijese.net/makale_indir/IJESE_2143_article_5d9b71999c179.pdf
Hidayati, N., & Idris, T. (2020). Students’ habits of mind profiles of biology education department at public and private universities in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13228a
Howard, P. G. (2018). Twenty-first century learning as a radical re-thinking of education in the service of life. Education Sciences, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040189
Hu, H. H., Kussmaul, C., Knaeble, B., Mayfield, C., & Yadav, A. (2016). Results from a survey of faculty adoption of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) in computer science. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 11-13-July, 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1145/2899415.2899471
Idris, T., Sriyati, S., & Rahmat, A. (2014). Pengaruh asesmen portofolio terhadap habits of mind dan penguasaan konsep biologi Siswa kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(1), 63–67. https://www.neliti.com/publications/118630/pengaruh-asesmen-portofolio-terhadap-habits-of-mind-dan-penguasaan-konsep-biolog
Ilma, S., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Saptasari, M. (2020). The correlation between science process skills and biology cognitive learning outcome of senior high school students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10794
Isfiani, R. (2016). Profil tingkatan habits of mind dan kecemasan kognitif dalam mata pelajaran biologi pada siswa SMA di kota Bandung. Biodidaktika, 11(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v11i2.1708
Jaffe, L., Gibson, R., & D’Amico, M. (2015). Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning: A natural fit for occupational therapy education. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 29(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2015.1010030
Janssen, F. J. J. M., Tigelaar, D. E. H., & Verloop, N. (2009). Developing biology lessons aimed at teaching for understanding: A domain-specific heuristic for student teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9118-3
Kalin, B., & Namdar, B. (2022). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning and scientific habits of mind: A case of hydroelectric power plants. Turkish Journal of Education, 11(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.980874
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
Lara Nieto-Márquez, N., Baldominos, A., & Pérez-Nieto, M. Á. (2020). Digital Teaching Materials and Their Relationship with the Metacognitive Skills of Students in Primary Education. Education Sciences, 10(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040113
Listiana, L., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Suarsini, E. (2016). Empowering students’ metacognitive skils through new teaching strategy (group investigation integrated with think talk write) in biology classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.391
Mägi, K., Männamaa, M., & Kikas, E. (2016). Profiles of self-regulation in elementary grades: Relations to math and reading skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.028
Mahanal, S. (2012). Strategi pembelajaran biologi, gender dan pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Seminar Nasional IX Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 1–7. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/prosbio/article/view/1040
Marita, R. A. S. (2014). Profil habits of mind siswa SMA kelas XI pada pembelajaran biologi menggunakan metode praktikum dan diskusi. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences Forum, 441–448. https://prosiding.upgris.ac.id/index.php/masif2014/masif2014/paper/view/519
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED461665
Morosanova, V. I., & Fomina, T. G. (2017). Self-regulation as a mediator in the relationship between anxiety and academic examination performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(June 2016), 1066–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.156
Noreen, S., Whyte, K. E., & Dritschel, B. (2015). Investigating the role of future thinking in social problem solving. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 46(March), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.08.004
Ongardwanich, N., Kanjanawasee, S., & Tuipae, C. (2015). Development of 21st century skill scales as perceived by students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 737–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.716
Padmanabha, C. H. (2020). Metacognition: Conceptual framework. I-Manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 14(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.14.1.16710
Prachagool, V., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). Investigating understanding the nature of science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 719–725. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20282
Pradiyanasari, N. W. E., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Doyan, A. (2020). The effect of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model on students’ concepts mastery. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 8(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v8i1.2776
Qadarsih, N. D. (2017). Pengaruh kebiasaan pikiran (habits of mind) terhadap penguasaan konsep matematika. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 2(2), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v2i2.2091
Ramalingam, D., Anderson, P., Duckworth, D., Scoular, C., & Heard, J. (2020). Creative thinking : Definition and structure. In Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=ar_misc
Rege, P., Havaldar, F., & Shaikh, G. (2016). An Effective use of POGIL in improving academic Performance of students and their approach in organic chemistry. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology, 4(1), 45–61. https://ijsrm.humanjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/6.Pralhad-Rege-Freddy-Havaldar-Gulshan-Shaikh.pdf
Soltis, R., Verlinden, N., Kruger, N., Carroll, A., & Trumbo, T. (2015). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning strategy enhances students’ higher level thinking skills in a pharmaceutical sciences course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79111
Soule, H., & Warrick, T. (2015). Defining 21st century readiness for all students: What we know and how to g...: Discovery service for FRESNO PACIFIC UNIV. American Psychological Association, 9(2), 178–186. http://0-eds.a.ebscohost.com.librarycatalog.fresno.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=0952ae08-6f01-4c16-897d-94fdd7019518%40sessionmgr4010
Sriyati, S., & Haka, N. B. (2016). Peran asesmen kinerja dalam meningkatkan habits of mind siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi 2016, 468–472. https://adoc.pub/queue/peran-asesmen-kinerja-dalam-meningkatkan-habits-of-mind-sisw.html
Suwono, H., Rofi’Ah, N. L., Saefi, M., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2021). Interactive socio-scientific inquiry for promoting scientific literacy, enhancing biological knowledge, and developing critical thinking. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 944–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2006270
Trevathan, J., Myers, T., & Gray, H. (2014). Scaling-up process-oriented guided inquiry learning techniques for teaching large information systems courses. Journal of Learning Design, 7(3), 23–38. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1048776.pdf
Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students’ chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395
Usmeldi. (2016). The development of research-based physics learning model with scientific approach to develop students’ scientific processing skill. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5802
Wang, A. Y. (2012). Exploring the relationship of creative thinking to reading and writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.09.001
Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27(November 2017), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
Zorluoğlu and Güven. (2020). Developing achievement test for 5th grade “‘electrical circuit elements.’” In International Journal of Current Approaches in Language Education and Social Sciences (p. 58). https://doi.org/10.35452/caless.2021.7
Zubaidah, S. (2020). Keterampilan abad ke-21: keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran online. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dengan Tema “Isu-Isu Strategis Pembelajaran MIPA Abad 21At: Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang – Kalimantan Barat, 2, 1–17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318013627_KETERAMPILAN_ABAD_KE-21_KETERAMPILAN_YANG_DIAJARKAN_MELALUI_PEMBELAJARAN
Zurita, G., Hasbun, B., Baloian, N., & Jerez, O. (2015). A blended learning environment for enhancing meaningful learning using 21st century skills. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, 9783662441879, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
