Framework problem solving based augmented reality media to empower scientific explanation skill
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i2.32387Keywords:
augmented reality, framework problem solving, scientific explanationAbstract
Development of scientific explanation abilities in students is an important aspect in science education. However, traditional learning methods such as textbooks and PowerPoint presentations are often less effective in improving skills due to lack of student interactivity and involvement in the learning process. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of using augmented reality media based on problem-solving frameworks to empower scientific explanation. The research design was used a Nonrandomized Control Group, Pretest-Posttest Design. The study used a quasi-experimental method with a factorial design of 2 x 2. The research sample was 72 students, one of senior high school in Indonesia. The sample was divided into two groups: the control group using two-dimensional learning media based on books, PowerPoints, and videos. The treatment group used augmented reality learning media based on problem-solving frameworks. The material used in the study is the human circulation system in biology subjects. The instrument used to obtain scientific explanation data is an essay test developed from scientific explanation indicators adapted from McKneill et al. Data analysis using ANCOVA (p=0.05%) with pre-test values as covariates. The results showed that augmented reality media based on problem-solving frameworks could empower and more significantly improve the ability of scientific explanation, this is evidenced by the average value of scientific explanation skills in the experimental class is higher than the control class.
Downloads
References
Abdinejad, M., Talaie, B., Qorbani, H. S., & Dalili, S. (2020). Student Perceptions Using Augmented Reality and 3D Visualization Technologies in Chemistry Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020
Al-Balushi, S. M., Al-Musawi, A. S., Ambusaidi, A. K., & Al-Hajri, F. H. (2017). The Effectiveness of Interacting with Scientific Animations in Chemistry Using Mobile Devices on Grade 12 Students’ Spatial Ability and Scientific Reasoning Skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9652-2
Alkhatib, O. J. (2019). A Framework for Implementing Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Decision-Making) in Engineering & Humanities. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8714232
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V, Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
Cari, Nasir, M., Sunarno, W., & Rahmawati, F. (2022). Flipped classroom using e-module to improve understanding of light concepts: Needs analysis of e-module development to empower scientific explanation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2165(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012040
Ceberio, M., Almudí, J. M., & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9615-7
Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Chiu, B.-C., Liu, C.-C., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Wen, C.-T., Hwang, F.-K., Wu, Y.-T., Chao, P.-Y., Lai, C.-H., Wu, S.-W., Chang, C.-K., & Chen, W. (2017). An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations. Computers & Education, 114, 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.008
Chen, S.-Y., & Liu, S.-Y. (2020). Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106418. https://awspntest.apa.org/record/2020-56842-001
Chin, K.-Y., & Wang, C.-S. (2021). Effects of augmented reality technology in a mobile touring system on university students’ learning performance and interest. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5841
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Fikriana, M. F., Wiyanto, W., & Haryani, S. (2023). Development of the Diary Book of Science with the STEM Approach of Discovery in Improving Students' Concept Understanding and Scientific Communication Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1641-1649. https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/article/download/3032/2426
Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., & Sánchez, A. (2014). Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 434–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.006
Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2018). Relations between student motivation, immersion and learning outcomes in location-based augmented reality settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 173–181. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563218303868
Gnidovec, T., Žemlja, M., Dolenec, A., & Torkar, G. (2020). Using Augmented Reality and the Structure–Behavior–Function Model to Teach Lower Secondary School Students about the Human Circulatory System. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 774–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09850-8
Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018). Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(2), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills. In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 37–56). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2
Hoban, G., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Creating a narrated stop-motion animation to explain science: The affordances of “Slowmation” for generating discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 42, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.04.007
Hong, Y.-S., Huang, S.-W., Chen, Y.-H., Sie, J.-J., Wang, Y.-P., & Chiu, P.-S. (2020). Design and Development of the Blood Cell Hazard AR Game. In International Conference on Frontier Computing (pp. 438–443). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3250-4_54
Kamarainen, A. M., Thompson, M., Metcalf, S. J., Grotzer, T. A., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2018). Prompting connections between content and context: blending immersive virtual environments and augmented reality for environmental science learning. International Conference on Immersive Learning, 36–54. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/education_facpubs/114/
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1893702
Kyza, E. A., & Georgiou, Y. (2019). Scaffolding augmented reality inquiry learning: The design and investigation of the TraceReaders location-based, augmented reality platform. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 211–225. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1205136
Laksmi, M. L., Sari, D. P., Rinanto, Y., & Sapartini, R. R. (2021). Implementation of Problem Based Learning to Increase Scientific Explanation Skill in Biology Learning about the Environment. 8(3), 532–540. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v8i3.531
Newman, D. L., Stefkovich, M., Clasen, C., Franzen, M. A., & Wright, L. K. (2018). Physical models can provide superior learning opportunities beyond the benefits of active engagements. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(5), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21159
Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-Based Higher Education – Is the Learning Styles ‘Myth’ Important? Frontiers in Psychology, 8(MAR), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444
Nielsen, B. L., Brandt, H., & Swensen, H. (2016). Augmented Reality in science education–affordances for student learning. NorDiNa, 12(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.5617/nordina.2399
Nikolai, J. R. A., Bennett, G., Marks, S., & Gilson, G. (2019). Active Learning and Teaching through Digital Technology and Live Performance: ‘Choreographic Thinking’ as Art Practice in the Tertiary Sector. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 38(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12181
Nuanmeesri, S. (2018). The Augmented Reality for Teaching Thai Students about the Human Heart. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(06), 203. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8506
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results Combined Executive Summaries Volume I, II & III.
Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., Kazanidis, I., & Wells, D. (2019). Augmenting the learning experience in primary and secondary school education: A systematic review of recent trends in augmented reality game-based learning. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 329–346. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10055-018-0347-2
Rashed, Z. N., & Mohd. Hanipah, N. R. B. (2022). Challenges and Best Practices of Teaching and Learning among Islamic Education Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 5(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v5i2.57195
Rohwer, Y., & Rice, C. (2015). How are Models and Explanations Related? Erkenntnis, 81(5), 1127–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9788-0
Shaturaev, J. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Public Education System of Indonesia and Uzbekistan. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications, 14(5), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.21786/bbrc/14.5/18
Shojaei, D., Olfat, H., Rajabifard, A., & Briffa, M. (2018). Design and development of a 3D digital cadastre visualization prototype. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7100384
Štampar, M., Tomc, J., Filipič, M., & Žegura, B. (2019). Development of in vitro 3D cell model from hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell line and its application for genotoxicity testing. Archives of Toxicology, 93(11), 3321–3333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02576-6
Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Qualitative
Wahyu, Y., Suastra, I. W., Sadia, I. W., & Suarni, N. K. (2020). The Effectiveness of Mobile Augmented Reality Assisted Stem-Based Learning on Scientific Literacy and Students' Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 343-356. https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2020_3_24.pdf
Wijayanto, T., Singgih Bektiarso, dan, Studi Pendidikan Fisika, P., Pendidikan MIPA, J., Jember Jl Kalimantan No, U., Timur, K., Sumbersari, K., & Jember -Jawa Timur, K. (2020). Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terstruktur terhadap Kemampuan Scientific Explanation Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika di SMA. In Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online (JPFT) (Vol. 8, Issue 2). https://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/108587
Yamani, H. A. (2021). A conceptual framework for integrating gamification in elearning systems based on instructional design model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 16(4), 14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i04.15693
Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). Constructing a Scientific Explanation—A Narrative Account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1902–1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.880527
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
