Innovating sustainable agriculture: Perspectives from economy and biology professionals

Albert Gamot Malau; April Gunawan Malau; Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak

doi:10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.32587

Authors

Albert Gamot Malau Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Science and Technology, Open University (Universitas Terbuka-Jakarta), Indonesia
April Gunawan Malau Research Department of Science, Research Department and Applied Postgraduate Degree, Maritime Institute (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran-Jakarta), Indonesia
Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak Research Department of Science, Research Department and Applied Postgraduate Degree, Maritime Institute (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran-Jakarta), Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.32587

Keywords:

biology professionals, economy professionals, multidisciplinary innovations, sustainable agriculture

Abstract

In the realm of agricultural development, the pursuit of sustainability stands as a paramount objective, necessitating an integration of multifaceted expertise from diverse disciplines. Amidst this pursuit, understanding the perspectives of professionals in both the realms of economy and biology becomes imperative, serving as a cornerstone for innovative strategies. This study examines the viewpoints of economy and biology professionals on multidisciplinary innovations for sustainable agricultural development. Through qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups, the research identifies key themes and challenges. Participants recognise the need for integrating diverse disciplines to address agricultural sustainability, emphasising the importance of economic viability and technological innovation. However, barriers such as high costs and limited access to resources hinder widespread adoption. Policy recommendations include incentivising sustainable practices and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. The results underscore the significance of multidisciplinary approaches in advancing sustainable agriculture, with implications for policy and practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abas, A. (2021). A systematic review on biomonitoring using lichen as the biological indicator: A decade of practices, progress and challenges. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107197.

Altieri, M. A. (2018). Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. CRC Press.

Anderson, J. A., Gipmans, M., Hurst, S., Layton, R., Nehra, N., Pickett, J., Shah, D. M., Souza, T. L. P. O., & Tripathi, L. (2016). Emerging agricultural biotechnologies for sustainable agriculture and food security. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 64(2), 383–393.

Antràs, P., & Chor, D. (2022). Global value chains. Handbook of International Economics, 5, 297–376.

Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596

Barrios, E., Gemmill-Herren, B., Bicksler, A., Siliprandi, E., Brathwaite, R., Moller, S., Batello, C., & Tittonell, P. (2020). The 10 Elements of Agroecology: enabling transitions towards sustainable agriculture and food systems through visual narratives. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 230–247.

Board, M., Board, O. S., & Council, N. R. (2014). Responding to oil spills in the US Arctic marine environment. National Academies Press.

Bröring, S., Laibach, N., & Wustmans, M. (2020). Innovation types in the bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121939.

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815.

Chatterjee, S., & Tandon, A. (2020). Climate Change Impact on Eco-biology and Socio-economy—A Concise Discussion. Socio-Economic and Eco-Biological Dimensions in Resource Use and Conservation: Strategies for Sustainability, 527–546.

Clark, D., Sampson, V., Stegmann, K., Marttunen, M., Kollar, I., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Weinberger, A., Menekse, M., & Laurinen, L. (2010). Online learning environments, scientific argumentation, and 21st century skills. In E-Collaborative Knowledge Construction: Learning from Computer-Supported and Virtual Environments. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-729-9.ch001

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.

D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., Leskinen, P., Matthies, B. D., & Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716–734.

Deguine, J.-P., Aubertot, J.-N., Bellon, S., Côte, F., Lauri, P.-E., Lescourret, F., Ratnadass, A., Scopel, E., Andrieu, N., & Bàrberi, P. (2023). Agroecological crop protection for sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 178, 1–59.

Diagne, C., Leroy, B., Vaissière, A.-C., Gozlan, R. E., Roiz, D., Jarić, I., Salles, J.-M., Bradshaw, C. J. A., & Courchamp, F. (2021). High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature, 592(7855), 571–576.

Domingues, F. C. (2013). 907 Maritime History and Maritime Archaeology. In B. Ford, D. L. Hamilton, & A. Catsambis (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Maritime Archaeology (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336005.013.0039

Fiksel, J. (2009). Design for environment: a guide to sustainable product development. McGraw-Hill Education.

Fischer, F., & Miller, G. J. (2017). Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods. Routledge.

Giller, K. E., Hijbeek, R., Andersson, J. A., & Sumberg, J. (2021). Regenerative agriculture: an agronomic perspective. Outlook on Agriculture, 50(1), 13–25.

Hardy, I., & Woodcock, S. (2015). Inclusive education policies: Discourses of difference, diversity and deficit. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(2), 141–164.

Jagannathan, S. V, Manemann, E. M., Rowe, S. E., Callender, M. C., & Soto, W. (2021). Marine actinomycetes, new sources of biotechnological products. Marine Drugs, 19(7), 365.

Judit, O., Péter, L., Péter, B., Mónika, H.-R., & József, P. (2017). The role of biofuels in food commodity prices volatility and land use. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(4), 81–93.

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42.

Kim, S.-K. (2020). Encyclopedia of marine biotechnology. John Wiley & Sons.

Lebeničnik, M., & Starčič, A. I. (2020). Examining the contemporary digital divide of university students with specific reference to students with special educational needs. In British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 51, Issue 6, pp. 2422–2441). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12920

Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Sablynski, C. J. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 161–187.

Lewandowski, I. (2018). Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, biobased economy. Springer nature.

McKinley, E., Acott, T., & Yates, K. L. (2020). Marine social sciences: Looking towards a sustainable future. Environmental Science & Policy, 108, 85–92.

Naydenov, K. (2018). Circular tourism as a key for eco-innovations in circular economy based on sustainable development. Proceeding of the 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 30, 18–132.

Notohadiprawiro, I. T., Utami, I. S. N. H., Purwanto, I. B. H., MP, M., Nurudin, M., Nasih Widya Yuwono, M. P., Pulungan, N. A. H. J., Rizqi, F. A., Putra, E. T. S., & Wulandari, A. C. (2022). Pertanian Setelah Revolusi Hijau: Teknologi Masukan Rendah (Low External Input For Sustainable Agriculture). Deepublish.

Omariba, A. (2021). Technology-Enhanced Classroom to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills. In Research Anthology on Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students (pp. 488–506). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3022-1.ch025

Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research (Vol. 36). Sage publications.

Prost, L., Berthet, E. T. A., Cerf, M., Jeuffroy, M.-H., Labatut, J., & Meynard, J.-M. (2017). Innovative design for agriculture in the move towards sustainability: scientific challenges. Research in Engineering Design, 28(1), 119–129.

Singh, C., Tiwari, S., Singh, J. S., & Yadav, A. N. (2020). Microbes in agriculture and environmental development. CRC Press.

Small, K. A. (2013). Urban transportation economics. Regional and Urban Economics Parts 1 & 2, 251–439.

Snapp, S., & Pound, B. (2017). Agricultural systems: agroecology and rural innovation for development: agroecology and rural innovation for development. Academic Press.

Social Infrastructure Needs: Financing Through Digital Platform. (2019). In International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (Vol. 8, Issue 11, pp. 220–226). Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Engineering and Sciences Publication - BEIESP. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.k1045.09811s19

Van der Ryn, S., & Cowan, S. (2013). Ecological design. Island press.

Vanloqueren, G., & Baret, P. V. (2017). How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations 1. In Food sovereignty, agroecology and biocultural diversity (pp. 57–92). Routledge.

Velten, S., Leventon, J., Jager, N., & Newig, J. (2015). What is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability, 7(6), 7833–7865.

Zakaria, F. B. (2017). Sacral Ecologies of the North Sumatran Highlands: An Environmental History of Conversions, c. 1800 to 1928. Yale University.