Analysis of innovative and inquiry biology learning design in in-service teacher students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i2.32986Keywords:
innovative learning design, inquiry-based, in-service teacherAbstract
The implementation of the Kurikulum Merdeka strongly recommends a model based on inquiry or investigations carried out actively by students. This study was conducted to analyze the tendencies of permanent teacher students in developing inquiry-based learning and its correlation with students' critical thinking skills. This survey research uses students of the biology in-service teacher at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang as a sample. The variables measured in this research include the variety of methods used, the variety of ways of perceiving problems, student collaboration activities, and the learning instructional quality. Data collection uses survey instruments that have been validated and reliable. Instrument validation uses the product moment validity test, while the reliability test uses the Alpha-Cronbach’s formula. The data obtained were analyzed using the Spearman's Rho correlation formula. The research results showed that the methods most frequently applied were group discussions (90.08%), presentations (82.64%), and questions and answers (76.86%). The most common way of apperception is by asking about experiences (70.25%) and stimulating students to share experiences (33.38%). Furthermore, teachers also provide collaboration space in most learning activities amounting to 67.77%. However, most new students disseminated definitions of terms in the project (64.46%) rather than explaining how the project was carried out (52.89%). Furthermore, the student worksheets developed have dominant problem solving activities (84.30%), have relevance to the learning model (72.73%), and evaluation questions have led to HOTS optimization. The research results also show a strong positive correlation (ρ=0.431, p<0.001) which shows that the relevance of student worksheets is strongly related to student HOTS.
Downloads
References
Aiman, U., Hasyda, S., & Uslan. (2020). The influence of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model assisted by realia media to improve scientific literacy and critical thinking skill of primary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1635
Burgess, A., Roberts, C., Ayton, T., & Mellis, C. (2018). Implementation of modified team-based learning within a problem based learning medical curriculum: A focus group study. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1172-8
Cahyaningtyas, A. P., Sari, Y., Yustiana, S., & Jupriyanto, J. (2020). Pelatihan penyusunan soal-soal berbasis HOTS dan aplikasinya dalam pembelajaran daring di sekolah dasar. Indonesian Journal of Community Services, 2(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.30659/ijocs.2.2.162-171
Casanoves, M., Salvadó, Z., González, Á., Valls, C., & Novo, M. T. (2017). Learning genetics through a scientific inquiry game. Journal of Biological Education, 51(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00219266.2016.1177569
Davidsen, J., Ryberg, T., & Bernhard, J. (2020). “Everything comes together”: Students’ collaborative development of a professional dialogic practice in architecture and design education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(June), 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100678
Demircioglu, T., Karakus, M., & Ucar, S. (2022). Developing students’ critical thinking skills and argumentation abilities through augmented reality-based argumentation activities in science classes. Science & Education, 32, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5
Dvir, B., Rutten, L., Butville, D., & Wilson, E. (2023). Partnering to support K-12 instruction of difficult topics through inquiry-based professional learning. School-University Partnerships, 16(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/sup-03-2023-0017
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(17). https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2022376118
Eslahchi, M. (2023). Leadership and collective learning: a case study of a social entrepreneurial organisation in Sweden. Learning Organization, 30(6), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-11-2022-0133
Febri, A., Sajidan, S., Sarwanto, S., & Harjunowibowo, D. (2020). Guided Inquiry Lab: Its Effect to Improve Student’s Critical Thinking on Mechanics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.4630
Fleischner, T. L., Espinoza, R. E., Gerrish, G. A., Greene, H. W., Kimmerer, R. W., Lacey, E. A., Pace, S., Parrish, J. K., Swain, H. M., Trombulak, S. C., Weisberg, S., Winkler, D. W., & Zander, L. (2017). Teaching biology in the field: Importance, challenges, and solutions. BioScience, 67(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix036
Frolova, E. V., Rogach, O. V., Tyurikov, A. G., & Razov, P. V. (2021). Online student education in a pandemic: New challenges and risks. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.1.43
Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., Kusdiastuti, M., & Herayanti, L. (2020). Improving students’ problem-solving skills using inquiry learning model combined with advance organizer. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a
Hasanah, N., Sembiring, M., Afni, K., Dina, R., & Wirevenska, I. (2022). Sosialisasi kurikulum merdeka merdeka belajar untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan para guru di SD Swasta Muhamaddiyah 04 Binjai. Ruang Cendikia : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(3), 235–238. https://jurnal.arkainstitute.co.id/index.php/ruang-cendekia/article/view/339
Hendri, S., Handika, R., Kenedi, A. K., & Ramadhani, D. (2021). Pengembangan modul digital pembelajaran matematika berbasis science, technology, engineering, mathematic untuk calon guru sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1172
Ilma, S., Henie, M., Al-Muhdhar, I., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting students’ metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.11591 /ijere.v11i1.22083
Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., Samala, A. D., Riyanda, A. R., & Adi, N. H. (2022). Relevansi kurikulum merdeka belajar dengan model pembelajaran abad 21 dalam perkembangan era society 5.0. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3011–3024. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2589
Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active Learning in STEM Education with Regard to the Development of Inquiry Skills. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686
Jovanka, D. R., Sumantri, M. S., Dhieni, N., & Karnadi. (2021). Early Childhood Educators’ Attitude toward STEAM and Online Learning as 21-st Century Skills. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 10(2), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijeces.v10i2.47862
Kambeyo, L., & Csapo, B. (2018). Scientific reasoning skills: A theoretical background on science education. Reform Forum, 26(1), 27–36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329196813_ scientific_reasoning_skills_a_theoretical_background_on_science_education
Karunanayaka, S. P., Rajendra, J. C. N., Ratnayake, H. U. W., & Naidu, S. (2016). Peer-facilitated discussions to enhance OER-based e-learning. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0022
Kazhikenova, G., Zhumataeva, E., Kozhamzharova, М., & Aubakirova, S. (2021). The effectiveness of reflective dialogue in the development of reflective thinking in rising teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100902
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1044508
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
Koh, J. H. L., Herring, S. C., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Project-based learning and student knowledge construction during asynchronous online discussion. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.003
Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15569530
Lafifa, F., Parno, P., Hamimi, E., & Setiawan, A. M. (2022). Development of STEM animation learning media with feedback to facilitate students’ critical thinking ability on global warming materials. Proceedings of the Eighth Southeast Asia Design Research (SEA-DR) & the Second Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture, and Humanity (STEACH) International Conference (SEADR-STEACH 2021), 627, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211229.002
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Lee, Y. A., & Takahashi, A. (2011). Lesson Plans and the Contingency of Classroom Interactions. Human Studies, 34, 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9181-1
Lelinge, B. (2023). Predicting challenges to student learning in a learning study: Analysing the intended object of learning. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 12(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-03-2022-0032
Li, B., Jia, X., Chi, Y., Liu, X., & Jia, B. (2020). Project-based learning in a collaborative group can enhance student skill and ability in the biochemical laboratory: a case study. Journal of Biological Education, 54(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1600570
Mohammad, R. F., & Kamran, M. (2023). Examining the efficacy of online learning in nurturing students’ learning: an analysis of students’ experiences. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 18(3), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2022-0163
Nareswari, N. L. P. S. R., Suarjana, I. M., & Sumantri, M. (2021). Belajar Matematika dengan LKPD Berbasis Kontekstual. Mimbar Ilmu, 26(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v26i2.35691
OECD, O. (2023a). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. In PISA: Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.31244/9783830998488
OECD, O. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During – and From – Disruption. In OECD Publishing: Vol. II. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-ii_a97db61c-en
Oğuz-Ünver, A., & Arabacioğlu, S. (2011). Overviews on inquiry based and problem based learning methods. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), Selected papers presented at WCNTSE, 303–310. http://webb.deu.edu.tr/baed/giris/baed/ozel_sayi/303-310.pdf
Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2022). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: a case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00110a
Pang, N. S. K. (2022). Teachers’ reflective practices in implementing assessment for learning skills in classroom teaching. ECNU Review of Education, 5(3), 470–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096 531120936290
Patilima, S. (2022). Sekolah penggerak sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas pendidikan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, 0(0), 228–236. http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.ph p/PSNPD/article/view/1069
Pattimura, S. ., Maimunah, M., & Hutapea, N. M. (2020). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika menggunakan pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk memfasilitasi pemahaman matematis peserta didik. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 800–812. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.286
Peffer, M. E., Beckler, M. L., Schunn, C., Renken, M., & Revak, A. (2015). Science Classroom Inquiry (SCI) simulations: A novel method to scaffold science learning. PLoS ONE, 10(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120638
Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM education: Inovasi dalam pembelajaran sains. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 23-. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/9810
Pluta, W. J., Richards, B. F., & Mutnick, A. (2013). PBL and Beyond: Trends in collaborative learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.842917
Rajendra, M. I., & Sudana, M. I. (2018). The influence of interactive multimedia technology to enhance achievement students on practice skills in mechanical technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(012104), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012104
Raymundo, M. R. D. R. (2020). Fostering creativity through online creative collaborative group projects. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2019-0048
Sari, R. S., Ningsi, N., Nasarudin, N., & Hakim, A. R. (2022). Free inquiry learning model with experimental methods on the learning outcomes of class X students of senior high school on the subject of motion. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10. 15294/jpfi.v18i2.28083
Schleicher, A. (2023). PISA 2022: Insights and Interpretations. In OECD 2023. https://www.hm.ee/ sites/default/files/documents/2023-12/PISA%202022%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations_OE CD.pdf
Sellars, M., Fakirmohammad, R., Bui, L., Fishetti, J., Niyozov, S., Reynolds, R., Thapliyal, N., Liu-Smith, Y.-L., & Ali, N. (2018). Conversations on critical thinking: Can critical thinking find its way forward as the skill set and mindset of the century? In Education Sciences (Vol. 8, Issue 4, p. 205). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040205
Selvaretnam, G. (2024). Facilitating feedback generation and group skill development through assessment design. Journal of Work-Applied Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2023-0103
Shore, A., & Dinning, T. (2023). Developing student’s skills and work readiness: an experiential learning framework. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 15(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-02-2023-0016
Sumartias, S., Unde, A. A., Wibisana, I. P., & Nugraha, A. R. (2020). The importance of local wisdom in building national character in the industrial age 4.0. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 397(Icliqe 2019), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.159
Suriswo, Aulia, F., & Utami, W. B. (2023). Development of the life skills learning model for elementary school students as strengthening the Pancasila student profile. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(2), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i2.37532
Syafi’i, F. F. (2021). Merdeka belajar: Sekolah penggerak. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar “Merdeka Belajar Dalam Menyambut Era Masyarakat 5.0,” November, 46–47. https://ejurnal. pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/PSNPD/article/view/1049
Syafii, W., & Yasin, R. M. (2013). Problem solving skills and learning achievements through problem-based module in teaching and learning biology in high school. Asian Social Science, 9(12 SPL ISSUE), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p220
Syahrial, S., Asrial, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Pratama, R. A. (2019). Towards improving the critical thinking skills of pre-service teachers in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(4), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i4.13613
Teo, T. W., Tan, A. L., Ong, Y. S., & Choy, B. H. (2021). Centricities of STEM curriculum frameworks: Variations of the S-T-E-M Quartet. STEM Education, 1(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme. 2021011
Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
Tuamsuk, K. (2013). Information literacy instruction in Thai higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.034
Utomo, A. P., Hasanah, L., Hariyadi, S., Narulita, E., Suratno, & Umamah, N. (2020). The effectiveness of steam-based biotechnology module equipped with flash animation for biology learning in high school. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020 .13232a
Yi, C., Zhu, R., & Wang, Q. (2021). Exploring the interplay between question-answering systems and communication with instructors in facilitating learning. Internet Research, 32(7), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2020-0459
Ylostalo, J. H. (2020). Engaging students into their own learning of foundational genetics concepts through the 5E learning cycle and interleaving teaching techniques. Journal of Biological Education, 54(5), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1620311
Zhou, C. (2021). The effectiveness of 5E model to improve the scientific creativity of teachers in rural areas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(May), 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100900
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
