Theoretical frameworks of self-efficacy in collaborative science learning practices: A systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i2.33628Keywords:
collaborative science learning, self-efficacy, systematic literature review, theoretical frameworkAbstract
Theoretical framework is one of the main parts of the research paper, so that researchers are expected to be able to determine the relevant theory that underlies their research. The purpose of conducting this systematic literature review (SLR) is to review of theoretical framework, compare, and describe various theoretical research frameworks in an investigative manner on the theme of self-efficacy in collaborative science learning that underlies publications in Scopus indexed journals in the last ten years. In this regard, we used the phrase "self-efficacy in collaborative science learning" on the disbursement menu in the Scopus database and found 711 articles. There were 63 articles that met the criteria for analysis. The inclusion and exclusion model used is PRISMA. The newly discovered aspects consist of community of practice, professional learning community, and reflection, which are as a result of the development of a theory of change and a theory of instruction constructed from theoretical frameworks in the recent collaborative science learning practices literature. Therefore, the development of this theory can be considered as a theoretical basis for developing the self-efficacy of prospective science teachers in collaborative learning in the future. The purpose of conducting this systematic literature review (SLR) is to review, compare, and describe various theoretical research frameworks in an investigative manner on the theme of self-efficacy in collaborative science learning that underlies publications in Scopus indexed journals in the last ten years. In this regard, we used the phrase "self-efficacy in collaborative science learning" on the disbursement menu in the Scopus database and found 711 articles. There were 63 articles that met the criteria for analysis. The inclusion and exclusion model used is PRISMA. The newly discovered aspects consist of community of practice, professional learning community, and reflection, which are as a result of the development of a theory of change and a theory of instruction constructed from theoretical frameworks in the recent collaborative science learning practices literature. Therefore, the development of this theory can be considered as a theoretical basis for developing the self-efficacy of prospective science teachers in collaborative learning in the future.
Downloads
References
Aldridge, J. M., Rijken, P. E., & Fraser, B. J. (2021). Improving learning environments through whole-school collaborative action research. Learning Environments Research, 24(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09318-x
Banegas, D. L., Loutayf, M. S., Company, S., Alemán, M. J., & Roberts, G. (2020). Learning to write book reviews for publication: A collaborative action research study on student-teachers’ perceptions, motivation, and self-efficacy. System, 95. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102371
Barker, K. S., Kim, D.-H., & Pendergraft, E. (2022). “It Felt Good to Be Included”: A Mixed-Methods Study of Pre-Kindergarten Teachers’ Experiences with Professional Learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(4), 593–604. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01175-4
Bennett, H., & Brunner, R. (2022). Nurturing the buffer zone: Conducting collaborative action research in contemporary contexts. Qualitative Research, 22(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120965373
Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: From theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60(5), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d
Brouwer, J., Jansen, E., Flache, A., & Hofman, A. (2016). The impact of social capital on self-efficacy and study success among first-year university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 109–118. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.016
Bükki, E., & Fehérvári, A. (2021). How do teachers collaborate in Hungarian VET schools? A quantitative study of forms, perceptions of impact and related individual and organisational factors. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-020-00108-6
Cañabate, D., Nogué, L., Serra, T., & Colomer, J. (2019). Supportive Peer Feedback in Tertiary Education: Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions. Education Sciences, 9(4), 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040280
Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 Years of the Community of Inquiry Framework. TechTrends, 64, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
Chase, A., Pakhira, D., & Stains, M. (2013). Implementing process-oriented, guided-inquiry learning for the first time: Adaptations and short-term impacts on students’ attitude and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(4), 409–416. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300181t
Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909
Cho, Y. H., & Lim, K. Y. T. (2017). Effectiveness of collaborative learning with 3D virtual worlds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12356
Compen, B., De Witte, K., & Schelfhout, W. (2021). The impact of teacher engagement in an interactive webinar series on the effectiveness of financial literacy education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 411–425. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13013
Coutts, L. (2019). Empowering students to take ownership of their learning: Lessons from one piano teacher’s experiences with transformative pedagogy. International Journal of Music Education, 37(3), 493–507. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761418810287
Cumming, M. M., Bettini, E., & Chow, J. C. (2023). High-Quality Systematic Literature Reviews in Special Education: Promoting Coherence, Contextualization, Generativity, and Transparency. Exceptional Children, 00144029221146576.
Darlow, B., Coleman, K., McKinlay, E., Donovan, S., Beckingsale, L., Gray, B., Neser, H., Perry, M., Stanley, J., & Pullon, S. (2015). The positive impact of interprofessional education: A controlled trial to evaluate a programme for health professional students Approaches to teaching and learning. BMC Medical Education, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0385-3
De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., De Smedt, F., Merchie, E., & Valcke, M. (2022). Identifying regulation profiles during computer-supported collaborative learning and examining their relation with students’ performance, motivation, and self-efficacy for learning. Computers & Education, 179, 104421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104421
De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2022). The functions of shared metacognitive regulation and their differential relation with collaborative learners’ understanding of the learning content. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101527
Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 53–66. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011
EL-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM integration in schools: Views from in-service science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2459–2484. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01235A
Esparza, D., Lynch-Arroyo, R. L., & Olimpo, J. T. (2022). Empowering Current and Future Educators: Using a Scalable Action Research Module as a Mechanism to Promote High-Quality Teaching and Learning in STEM. Frontiers in Education, 6. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.754097
Frantz, K. J., Demetrikopoulos, M. K., Britner, S. L., Carruth, L. L., Williams, B. A., Pecore, J. L., DeHaan, R. L., & Goode, C. T. (2017). A Comparison of Internal Dispositions and Career Trajectories after Collaborative versus Apprenticed Research Experiences for Undergraduates. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(1), ar1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-06-0206
Gambo, Y., & Shakir, M. Z. (2021). Review on self-regulated learning in smart learning environment. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00157-8
Goldstein, O. (2016). A project-based learning approach to teaching physics for pre-service elementary school teacher education students. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1200833. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1200833
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Heikonen, L., Pietarinen, J., Toom, A., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2020). The development of student teachers’ sense of professional agency in the classroom during teacher education. Learning: Research and Practice, 6(2), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1725603
Ho, H. C. Y., Poon, K.-T., Chan, K. K. S., Cheung, S. K., Datu, J. A. D., & Tse, C. Y. A. (2023). Promoting preservice teachers’ psychological and pedagogical competencies for online learning and teaching: The T.E.A.C.H. program. Computers & Education, 195, 104725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104725
Hou, X., Bai, Y., Xie, Y., Ge, H., Li, Y., Shang, C., & Shen, Q. (2023). Deep collaborative learning with class-rebalancing for semi-supervised change detection in SAR images. Knowledge-Based Systems, 264, 110281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110281
Hsu, T.-C., Abelson, H., Patton, E., Chen, S.-C., & Chang, H.-N. (2021). Self-efficacy and behavior patterns of learners using a real-time collaboration system developed for group programming. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16(4), 559–582. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09357-3
Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022a). Action competencies for sustainability and its implications to environmental education for prospective science teachers: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Eduaction, 18(8), em2138.
Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022b). The development and validation of environmental literacy instrument based on spirituality for prospective science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2206.
Ibbotson, L., & See, B. H. (2021). Delivering Music Education Training for Non-Specialist Teachers through Effective Partnership: A Kodály-Inspired Intervention to Improve Young Children’s Development Outcomes. Education Sciences, 11(8), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080433
James, M., Baptista, A. M. T., Barnabas, D., Sadza, A., Smith, S., Usmani, O., & John, C. (2022). Collaborative case-based learning with programmatic team-based assessment: A novel methodology for developing advanced skills in early-years medical students. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03111-5
Ke, F., Dai, Z., Pachman, M., & Yuan, X. (2021). Exploring multiuser virtual teaching simulation as an alternative learning environment for student instructors. Instructional Science, 49(6), 831–854. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09555-4
Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
Kholifaturrohmah, R., & Mulasiwi, C. M. (2021). Analysis of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) to the Economics and Accounting Teachers. Dinamika Pendidikan, 16(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v16i2.30419
Kivunja, C. (2018). Distinguishing between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework: A Systematic Review of Lessons from the Field. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 44–53.
Kropf, D. C. (2013). Connectivism: 21st Century’s New Learning Theory. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 16(2), 13–24.
Liljenberg, M. (2021). A professional development practice to enhance principals’ instructional leadership – enabling and constraining arrangements. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 6(4), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-12-2020-0102
Manalu, J. B., Sitohang, P., & Henrika, N. H. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Prosiding Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.34007/ppd.v1i1.174
Marlina, R., Suwono, H., Yuenyong, C., Ibrohim, I., & Hamdani, H. (2023). Reflection Practice in Microteaching: Evidence from Prospective Science Teachers. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v8i1.15846
Marlina, R., Suwono, H., Yuenyong, C., Ibrohim, I., & Hamdani, H. (2024). Video-based microteaching to facilitate the basic teaching skills of preservice biology teacher. 3106, 030047. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0215234
Marlina, R., Suwono, H., Yuenyong, C., Ibrohim, I., Mahanal, S., Saefi̇, M., & Hamdani̇, H. (2023). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Preservice Biology Teachers: Two Insights More Promising. Participatory Educational Research, 10(6), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.99.10.6
Matinde, E. (2019). Students’ perceptions on reciprocal peer tutorial assessment in an undergraduate course in process metallurgy. Education Sciences, 9(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010027
Md Sari, N., & Yin Yin, K. (2021). The Effect of Google Classroom-Assisted Learning on Self-Efficacy among Form Six Economics Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), Pages 1922-1938. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11527
Mohamadi, F. S., Asadzadeh, H., Ahadi, H., & Jomehri, F. (2011). Testing Bandura’s Theory in school. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.053
Molway, L. (2019). “It’s all about coping with the new specifications”: Coping professional development – the new CPD. London Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.2.01
Muñoz Miguel, J. P., Simón de Blas, C., Anguita Rodríguez, F., & García Sipols, A. E. (2023). Collaborative learning in management subjects to university students: A multi-level research to identify group profile, engagement and academic performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100762
Nelson, L. P. (2021). Service-learning collaboration: Improving teachers’ critical-thinking and job-skill training using active simulation. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(9), 189–202. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i9.4600
Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl_1), 5200–5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100
Niederriter, J., Hovland, C., Hazelett, S., Whitford, M., Drost, J., Brown, D., Morgan, A., Kropp, D., Sanders, M., Gareri, M., Fosnight, S., Radwany, S., McQuown, C., & Ahmed, R. (2020). Using the Constructivist/Active Learning Theoretical Framework to develop and test a simulation-based interprofessional geriatric training curriculum. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 19, 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2020.100322
Nurwidodo, N., Ibrohim, I., Sueb, S., & Husamah, H. (2023). “Let’s transform!”: A systematic literature review of science learning in COVID-19 pandemic era. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), em2224.
Ovenden-Hope, T., Blandford, S., Cain, T., & Maxwell, B. (2018). RETAIN early career teacher retention programme: Evaluating the role of research informed continuing professional development for a high quality, sustainable 21st century teaching profession. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(5), 590–607. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1516349
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., & Moher, D. (2021). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103–112.
Papa, A., Chierici, R., Ballestra, L. V., Meissner, D., & Orhan, M. A. (2020). Harvesting reflective knowledge exchange for inbound open innovation in complex collaborative networks: An empirical verification in Europe. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(4), 669–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0300
Pareto, L., & Willermark, S. (2022). Tracing expansive learning in computer-supported collaborative teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 33, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100617
Peng, Y., Li, Y., Su, Y., Chen, K., & Jiang, S. (2022). Effects of group awareness tools on students’ engagement, performance, and perceptions in online collaborative writing: Intergroup information matters. The Internet and Higher Education, 53, 100845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100845
Piro, J. S., Dunlap, K., & Shutt, T. (2014). A collaborative Data Chat: Teaching summative assessment data use in pre-service teacher education. Cogent Education, 1(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2014.968409
Pujaningsih, & Ambarwati, U. (2020). Self efficacy changes in collaborative course for inclusive education preservice teachers. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 79–88. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.26669
Schipper, T. M., de Vries, S., Goei, S. L., & van Veen, K. (2020). Promoting a professional school culture through lesson study? An examination of school culture, school conditions, and teacher self-efficacy. Professional Development in Education, 46(1), 112–129. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1634627
Schwägele, S., Zürn, B., Lukosch, H. K., & Freese, M. (2021). Design of an Impulse-Debriefing-Spiral for Simulation Game Facilitation. Simulation & Gaming, 52(3), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781211006752
Shang, D., & Wu, W. (2022). Does green morality lead to collaborative consumption behavior toward online collaborative redistribution platforms? Evidence from emerging markets shows the asymmetric roles of pro-environmental self-identity and green personal norms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102993
Shin, S., Kwon, K., & Jung, J. (2022). Collaborative Learning in the Flipped University Classroom: Identifying Team Process Factors. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127173
Simon, M. A. (2022). Contributions of the learning through activity theoretical framework to understanding and using manipulatives in the learning and teaching of mathematical concepts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100945
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(July), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sorvari, J., Rusko, S., Jackson, N., & Ainonen, H.-L. (2020). Integrating entrepreneurial working life skills with foreign language teaching-two cases from the University of Oulu. Language Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 521–529. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2020-2033
Staats, A. W., & Eifert, G. H. (1990). The paradigmatic behaviorism theory of emotions: Basis for unification. Clinical Psychology Review, 10(5), 539–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(90)90096-S
Su, Y., Liang, J.-C., Zheng, C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2023). Co-regulation strategies and their associations with writing self-efficacy in a computer-mediated collaborative writing setting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, 100972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100972
Symes, W., Lazarides, R., & Hußner, I. (2023). The development of student teachers’ teacher self-efficacy before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103941
Thibodeau, M. A., Geller, J., & Iyar, M. (2016). Development of self-report scales measuring collaborative vs. directive support: Assessing beliefs and behaviors in carers of adults with eating disorders. Eating Behaviors, 23, 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.10.001
Thompson, G., & Dooley, K. (2019). Exploring the key domains where teacher efficacy beliefs operate for Japanese high-school English teachers. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(3), 503–518. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09607-y
Tilak, S., Glassman, M., Peri, J., Xu, M., Kuznetcova, I., & Gao, L. (2022). Need satisfaction and collective efficacy in undergraduate blog-driven classes: A structural equation modelling approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 75–90. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7963
van Blankenstein, F. M., Saab, N., van der Rijst, R. M., Danel, M. S., Bakker-van den Berg, A. S., & van den Broek, P. W. (2019). How do self-efficacy beliefs for academic writing and collaboration and intrinsic motivation for academic writing and research develop during an undergraduate research project? Educational Studies, 45(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1446326
Volet, S., Jones, C., & Vauras, M. (2019). Attitude-, group- and activity-related differences in the quality of preservice teacher students’ engagement in collaborative science learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.002
Whitley, J. (2021). Perspectives of Parents of Children With Special Education Needs: Self-Efficacy and School Supports During COVID-19 School Closures. Exceptionality Education International, 31(1), 97–114.
Willegems, V., Consuegra, E., Struyven, K., & Engels, N. (2017). Teachers and pre-service teachers as partners in collaborative teacher research: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.014
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yeşi̇Lçinar, S., & Aykan, A. (2022). Lesson study and 21st-century skills: Pre-service Teachers Reason, Produce and Share. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.68.9.3
Zhong, Q. (2013). Understanding Chinese learners’ willingness to communicate in a New Zealand ESL classroom: A multiple case study drawing on the theory of planned behavior. System, 41(3), 740–751. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.001
Zou, D., Zhang, R., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Digital game-based learning of information literacy: Effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy and flow experiences. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 152–170. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.6682
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
