Development of assessment instrument business proposal for students' systems thinking skills on business model canvas in bioentrepreneurship course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3.34840Keywords:
Assessment Instruments, system thinking skills, Business Model Canvas, BioentrepreneurshipAbstract
Business Model Canvas (BMC) is a business model that must be mastered by students in the Bioentrepreneurship course as an initial provision for entering the entrepreneurial world, while in compiling Business Model Canvas (BMC) systematic thinking skills are needed. This study aims to provide an assessment instrument to measure students' system thinking skills in Business Model Canvas (BMC) material. The method used in this research is exploratory mixed method with exploratory sequential design stages. The participants involved were 40 students of Biology study program who contracted Bioentrepreneur course in one of the universities in Bandung City. The instrument was developed in the form of an assessment rubric with 29 indicators of systems thinking skills in Business Model Canvas. The quality of the instrument with validity based on expert judgment obtained a value of 89.3% with a very valid category, and the quality of the instrument with inter-rater reliability based on Cronbach's Alpha value obtained a value of 0.762 to 1.000 which is categorized as very good. Students' system thinking skills can emerge and be measured in the creation of a Business Model Canvas (BMC) in a business proposal by using the developed assessment instrument. So that the novelty in this study is that the assessment instrument of students' system thinking ability in making Business Model Canvas is declared valid and feasible for use in Bioentrepreneurship courses.
Downloads
References
Afriadi, R., & Yuni, R. (2018). Pengembangan jiwa bioenterpreuner mahasiswa biologi. Jurnal Biolokus, 1(2), 123–127.
Almeida, F. (2018). Book review: A. Campbell, M. Gutierrez and M. Lancelott, operating model canvas. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 22(1), 116–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262918754445
Andriani, D., & Hamdu, G. (2021). Analisis rubrik penilaian berbasis education for sustainable development dan konteks berpikir sistem di sekolah dasar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1326–1336. https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/514
Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2010). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20351
Bhatnagar, R., Kim, J., & E. Many, J. (2014). Candidate surveys on program evaluation: examining instrument reliability, validity and program effectiveness. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 683–690. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-8-18
Bungsu, R., & Rosadi, K. I. (2021). Faktor yang mempengaruhi berpikir sistem : Aspek. JEMSI, Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informatika, 2(2), 205–215.
Clark, S., Petersen, J. E., Frantz, C. M., Roose, D., Ginn, J., & Daneri, D. R. (2017). Teaching systems thinking to 4th and 5th graders using Environmental Dashboard display technology. PLoS ONE, 12(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176322
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ermaya, S. K., & Darna, N. (2019). Strategi pengembangan bisnis dengan pendekatan business model canvas (Studi kasus: Industri kecil kerupuk). Business Management and Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3), 201–218.
Fust, A. P., Jenert, T., & Winkler, C. (2018). Experiential or self-regulated learning: a critical reflection of entrepreneurial learning processes. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 8(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0098
Gaus, O., & Raith, M. G. (2016). Commercial transfer – A business model innovation for the entrepreneurial university. Industry and Higher Education, 30(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422216653197
Gilbert, L. A., Gross, D. S., & Kreutz, K. J. (2019). Developing undergraduate students’ systems thinking skills with an InTeGrate module. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1529469
Halecker, B., & Hartmann, M. (2014). How can systems thinking add value to business model innovation ? ISPM Conference - Innovating in Global Markets, (June), 1–14.
Hartini, S. (2013). Pengembangan indikator dalam upaya mencapai kompetensi dasar bahasa indonesia di sekolah menengah atas Kabupaten Karanganyar Jawa Tengah. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia 2013, 198–214.
Ibarra, D., Ganzarain, J., & Igartua, J. I. (2018). Business model innovation through Industry 4.0: A review. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.002
Indriani, N., & Lazulva, L. (2020). Desain dan uji coba LKPD interaktif dengan pendekatan scaffolding pada materi hidrolisis garam. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 3(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v3i1.9161
Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L. (2016). The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067
Langer, L. J. (2014). Building a curriculum for bioentrepreneurs. Nature Biotechnology, 32(9), 863–865. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3012
Lima, M., & Baudier, P. (2017). Business model canvas acceptance among french entrepreneurship students: principles for enhancing innovation artefacts in business education. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 23(2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0008
Machsunah, Y. C., & Nurdiana, R. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian pemahaman konsep business model canvas pada mata kuliah kewirausahaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 11(2), 434–446.
Mahmudi, I. (2018). Rubrik analitik penilaian hasil belajar praktik Pendidikan Agama Islam. Fikrah: Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 32–154.
Massa, L., Tucci, C., & Afuah, A. (2017). A Critical Assessment Of Business Model Research by Lorenzo Massa Christopher Tucci Allan Afuah. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 73–104.
Maulana, A. (2022). Analisis Validtas, reliabilitas, dan kelayakan instrumen penilaian rasa percaya diri siswa. Jurnal Kualita Pendidikan, 3(3), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.51651/jkp.v3i3.331
Mishra, C. S., & Zachary, R. K. (2015). The theory of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0042
Natadiwijaya, I. F., & Rahmat, A. (2018). Sikap wirausaha mahasiswa pada perkuliahan bioteknologi bermuatan bioenterpreneurship. Mangifera Edu, 3(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.31943/mangiferaedu.v3i1.11
Nurhakim, A. S., Suparno, O., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2018). Pengembangan model bisnis dan strategi pelayanan kesehatan XYZ. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 4(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.4.2.251
O’Neill, T. W. (2015). The business model canvas as a platform for business information literacy Instruction. Reference Services Review, 43(3), 450–460.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation. In Booksgooglecom (Vol. 30). http://www.amazon.com/Business-Model-Generation-Visionaries-Challengers/dp/0470876417
Otaya, L. G. (2017). Konstruksi penilaian berbasis kinerja (Performance based assessment) dalam meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran mahasiswa pada mata kuliah statistika. Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 28–51. https://www.journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/tjmpi/article/view/471%0Ahttps://www.journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/tjmpi/article/download/471/417
Schuler, S., Fanta, D., Rosenkraenzer, F., & Riess, W. (2018). Systems thinking within the scope of education for sustainable development (ESD)–a heuristic competence model as a basis for (science) teacher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1339264
Setyosari, P. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan dan pengembangan. Kencana.
Sisnodo, S., Ridlo, S., & Widyaningrum, P. (2015). Pembelajaran bervisi bioentrepreneurship melalui pembuatan makanan hasil fermentasi berbahan dasar kedelai lokal. Biosel: Biology Science and Education, 4(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.33477/bs.v4i2.541
Slamet, R., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2022). Validitas dan reliabilitas terhadap instrumen kepuasan kerja. Aliansi : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 17(2), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.46975/aliansi.v17i2.428
Sort, J. C., & Nielsen, C. (2018). Using the business model canvas to improve investment processes. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 20(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-11-2016-0048
Sugiono, S., Noerdjanah, N., & Wahyu, A. (2020). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas alat ukur SG posture evaluation. Jurnal Keterapian Fisik, 5(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.37341/jkf.v5i1.167
Sugiyono, S. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, S. (2014). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan Rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Supriatno, B., Suwandi, T., Kusumawaty, D., & Ahyani, A. (2020). Buku ajar bioentrepreneur. Bandarlampung: Pusaka Media.
Suwarno, S., & Aeni, C. (2021). Pentingnya rubrik penilaian dalam pengukuran kejujuran peserta didik. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 19(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.31571/edukasi.v19i1.2364
Varamäki, E., Joensuu, S., Tornikoski, E., & Viljamaa, A. (2015). The development of entrepreneurial potential among higher education students. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(3), 563–589.
Verrue, J. (2014). A critical investigation of the Osterwalder business model canvas: an in-depth case study. Belgian Entrepreneurship Research Day, Proceedings, (May 2014), 17.
Wangi, N. B. S., Budiyono, R., Novaria, D., Nurdiana, R., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). Arranging the Reliable and valid assessment’s instrument for business model canvas comprehension. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 3(5), 1068–1074.
Wijayati, P. H., Suyata, & Sumarno. (2013). Model evaluasi pembelajaran berbasis kaizen di sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 318–332. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep/article/view/1364/1133
Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3–14.
Zarefard, M., & Cho, S. E. (2017). Relationship between entrepreneurs’ managerial competencies and innovative start-up intentions in university students: An iranian case. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 21(3), 1–19.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.