Profile and validity of PBL-SETS interactive multimedia to train learners' science literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3.35861Keywords:
interactive multimedia, PBL-SETS, science literacyAbstract
The background of this research is the low science literacy of Indonesian students based on PISA results caused by non-contextual learning and conventional methods. This study aims to develop and validate an interactive multimedia program based on the Problem-Based Learning-Science, Environment, Technology, and Society (PBL-SETS) approach to train students' science literacy. This research uses an R&D (research and development) approach with define, design, develop, and disseminate (4D) model, which is limited to only the validation stage of development. Although many studies have shown the effectiveness of interactive multimedia in improving science literacy, the combination of PBL, SETS, and interactive multimedia still needs to be researched, especially in Indonesia. The results showed that the developed PBL-SETS interactive multimedia had very valid criteria, with an overall average score of 94.15%. These results indicate that PBL-SETS interactive multimedia is valid and feasible to be used as a learning alternative to train students' science literacy in school.
Downloads
References
Ahied, M., Muharrami, L. K., Fikriyah, A., & Rosidi, I. (2020). Improving students’ scientific literacy through distance learning with augmented reality-based multimedia amid the covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26123
Awaludin, J., Kurniati, T. H., Ristato, R. H., & Komala, R. (2024). How environmental literacy research works in biology learning? A literature review. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31291
Bramastia, B., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Study of science learning based on scientific literacy in improving critical thinking: A scoping review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 499–510. https://doi. org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.5667
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Efklides, A. (2014). How does metacognition contribute to the regulation of learning? An integrative approach. Psihologijske Teme, 23(1), 1–30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27990044 8_How_Does_Metacognition_Contribute_to_the_Regulation_of_Learning_An_Integrative_Approach
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
Ghani, A. S. A., Rahim, A. F. A., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Hadie, S. N. H. (2021). Effective learning behavior in problem-based learning: a scoping review. Medical Science Educator, 31(3), 1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01292-0
Glaze, A. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010012
Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century skills. In Assessing 21st Century Skills (Issue September). Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13215
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hapsari, Fitriyanto, S., Hermansyah, Yahya, F., & Walidain, S. N. (2020). Multimedia interaktif konsep gravitasi berorientasi pada literasi sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 6(2), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2097
Hero, L. M., & Lindfors, E. (2019). Students’ learning experience in a multidisciplinary innovation project. Education and Training, 61(4), 500–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2018-0138
Im, C., & Park, M. (2014). Development and evaluation of a computerized multimedia approach to educate older adults about safe medication. Asian Nursing Research, 8(3), 193–200. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.anr.2014.06.001
Kemendikbudristek, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia (2022). https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/sjdih/siperpu/dokumen/salinan/salinan_20220421 _105322_Final JDIH Salinan Permendikbudristek No 16 Tahun 2022 ttg Standar Proses.pdf
Khaleyla, F., Wisanti, W., Ambarwati, R., Rahayu, D. A., & Putri, E. K. (2021). Software preference for online learning of science and biology teachers under COVID-19 pandemic. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i1.14253
Khasanah, N. (2015). SETS (Science, Environmental, Technology And Society) sebagai pendekatan pembelajaran IPA modern pada kurikulum 2013. In Seminar Nasional Konservasi dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam 2015. https://www.neliti.com/publications/170173/sets-scie nce-environmental-technology-and-society-sebagai-pendekatan-pembelajara#id-section-content
Kho, L. S., & Chen, C. J. (2017). Effects of different student response modes on science learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 996–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1 242080
Li, A., Jiang, X., Liu, B., Liang, J., & Xiao, Y. (2022). Tackling math word problems with fine-to-coarse abstracting and reasoning. ArXiv.Org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.08274
Mahlianurrahman, Lasmawan, I. W., Candiasa, I. M., & Suastra, I. W. (2023). The effect of nyerayo based SETS learning on student ’ s scientific literacy. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.10
Nainggolan, V. A., Situmorang, R. P., & Hastuti, S. P. (2021). Learning bryophyta : I mproving students ’ scientific literacy through problem-based learning. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i1.13926
Nisa, K., Wiyanto, W., & Sumarni, W. (2021). Sistematik literatur review: Literasi sains dan SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, and Society). EDUSAINS, 13(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10. 15408/es.v13i1.18717
Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2016). Fostering 21st-Century evolutionary reasoning: Teaching tree thinking to introductory biology students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–12. https://doi.org /10.1187/cbe.15-06-0127
OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 result in focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
OECD. (2023a). PISA 2025 science framework (draft). In pisa-framework.oecd.org. https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/
OECD, O. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. In PISA: Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.31244/9783830998488
OECD, O. (2023c). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During – and From – Disruption. In OECD Publishing: Vol. II. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-ii_a97db6 1c-en
Rachmawati, N. Y., & Rosy, B. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemecahan masalah pada mata pelajaran administrasi umum kelas X OTKP di SMK Negeri 10 Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(2), 246–259. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpap/article/view/9612/4328
Rahayu, S. (2017). Promoting the 21st century scientific literacy skills through innovative chemistry instruction. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1911(1), 20025. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016018
Rajeshwari M., Vinayachandra, Geetha Poornima K., & Krishna Prasad K. (2021). An analysis into the contribution of google applications in the successful implementation of online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 5(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJAEML.2581.7000.0098
Ramadannisaa, R. F., & Hartina, M. M. (2021). The design of web-based learning using google sites for teaching heat and temperature topic. JPPPF (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika), 7(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/1.07202
Reece, G. J. (2005). Critical thinking and cognitive transfer: Implications for the development of online information literacy tutorials. Research Strategies, 20(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resstr. 2006.12.018
Rofieq, A., Hindun, I., Shultonnah, L., & Miharja, F. J. (2021). Developing textbook based on scientific approach, critical thinking, and science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012030
Sadeghi, A. H., Mathari, S. el, Abjigitova, D., Maat, A. P. W. M., Taverne, Y. J. H. J., Bogers, A. J. J. C., & Mahtab, E. A. F. (2022). Current and future applications of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in cardiothoracic surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 113(2), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.athoracsur.2020.11.030
Santos, G., Sá, J. C., Félix, M. J., Barreto, L., Carvalho, F., Doiro, M., Zgodavová, K., & Stefanović, M. (2021). New needed quality management skills for quality managers 4.0. Sustainability, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116149
Sari, R. M., Sumarmi, Astina, I. K., Utomo, D. hari, & Ridhwan. (2021). Measuring students scientific learning perception and critical thinking skill using paper-based testing: school and gender differences. International Journal of Emerging Technogies in Learning, 14(19), 132–149. https:// doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i19.10968
Schleicher, A. (2023). PISA 2022: Insights and Interpretations. In OECD 2023. https://www.hm.ee/ sites/default/files/documents/2023-12/PISA 2022 Insights and Interpretations _OECD.pdf%0A
Sekarsari, A., & Aznam, N. (2019). The effectiveness of science learning media using focusky software on in jounal ’ higher order thinking skills. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 8(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i1.3886
Shofawati, A., Widodo, W., & Sari, D. A. P. (2023). The use of multimdia interactive to improve students science literacy in the new normal era. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 18(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.29303/j pm.v18i1.3832
Sholikah, L., & Pertiwi, F. N. (2021). Analysis of science literacy ability of junior high school students based on programme for international student assessement (PISA). Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 2(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v2i 1.2922
Sidabutar, H., & Sembiring, D. (2023). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif berbasis website pada materi sistem pernapasan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains siswa kelas XI. Innovative: Jurnal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 4531–4542. https://doi.org/10.31004/innova tive.v3i2.605
Sulistiyo, A. K. B., Indriyanti, D. R., & Parmin. (2021). Environment material in science learning using problem based learning model with the SETS approach in terms of students ’ activities and learning outcomes. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 10(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE. V9I1.38028
Sunnemark, F., Lundqvist Westin, W., Al Saad, T., & Assmo, P. (2023). Exploring barriers and facilitators to knowledge transfer and learning processes through a cross-departmental collaborative project in a municipal organization. Learning Organization. https://doi.org/10. 1108/TLO-01-2023-0003
Surjono, H. D. (2017). Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif: Konsep dan Pengembangan (1st ed.). UNY Press. https://www.academia.edu/37509342/Herman_Dwi_Surjono_2017_Multimedia_Pembela jaran_Interaktif_Konsep_dan_Pengembangan_Edisi_Pertama_Yogyakarta_UNY_Press
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1976). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. In Indiana: Indiana University Bloomington. https://files. eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Townley, A. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/edu csci8010012
Verhoef, N. C., Coenders, F., Pieters, J. M., van Smaalen, D., & Tall, D. O. (2015). Professional development through lesson study: teaching the derivative using GeoGebra. Professional Development in Education, 41(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.886285
Virtič, M. P. (2022). Teaching science & technology: components of scientific literacy and insight into the steps of research. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1916–1931. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414
Widodo, W., Sudibyo, E., Suryanti, Sari, D. A. P., Inzanah, & Setiawan, B. (2020). The effectiveness of gadget-based interactive multimedia in improving generation z’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23208
Yulianti, D., & Herpratiwi. (2024). Development of a science , environment , technology , and society- based learning module to foster critical thinking in elementary students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21713
Yulistiana. (2015). Penelitian pembelajaran berbasis SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, and Society) dalam pendidikan sains. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 76–82. https:// doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i1.169
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
