Environmental literacy profile in Bantul, Special Region of Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Wardatul Uyun Biology Education Masters Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • S. Suhartini Biology Education Masters Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3.36733

Keywords:

affective domain, behavior domain, competency domain, environmental literacy

Abstract

Environmental issues are occurring more frequently, both due to natural causes and human activities. If left unchecked, human activities can worsen environmental conditions. Bantul Regency in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, is one of the regions grappling with this issue, primarily due to waste management and industrial activities. Environmental issues are related to environmental literacy. The lack of education, awareness, and knowledge in society can degrade environmental quality. Environmental literacy plays an important role in enhancing knowledge as well as changing the attitudes and behaviors of society towards the environment. Therefore, it is important to instill environmental literacy in individuals to improve our attitudes towards the environment. This study aims to provide an overview of students's environmental literacy in Bantul Regency. The research uses a survey method conducted in Bantul Regency from September to November 2023. The population of this study includes all 10th-grade students from public high schools in Bantul Regency. The sample consists of 300 10th-grade students from public high schools in the sub-districts of Bantul, Banguntapan, Sewon, Jetis, Piyungan, Imogiri, Pajangan, Srandakan, Sedayu, and Dlingo. The study's results show that the environmental literacy profile of 10th-grade students in Bantul Regency falls into the "average" category, with a percentage score of 65.96%. The highest score in the competency domain is found in Bantul City (81.90%) and falls into the "good" category, while the lowest score is in Dlingo Sub-district (60.93%), categorized as "average" The highest score in the affective domain is in Dlingo Sub-district (70.25%), categorized as "average" while the lowest score is in Jetis Sub-district (66.67%), also categorized as "average." The highest score in the behavior domain is found in Imogiri Sub-district (64.91%), categorized as "average" while the lowest score is in Srandakan Sub-district (55.30%), categorized as "low."

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adinugroho, G., Arifa’ilah, I., Elvina, S., Inriyatni, S., & Aisyah, T. (2016). Pola Spasial Indeks Kesulitan Geografis dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pembangunan Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Plano Madani, 11(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpm.v5i2.1579

Anisah, A. P., Ju, A. B., Tng, A., Zikra, El., Weley, N. C., & Fitri, W. (2021). Dampak Alih Fungsi Lahan Terhadap Keberlanjutan Suplai Air Bersih Dalam Menjaga Ekosistem Darat. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v2i12.354

Antin, T., Wahyuni, H. I., & Partini, P. (2017). Literasi Sampah Berbasis Komunikasi Pembangunan di Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v15i3.2171 https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v15i3.2171

Ayu, F. R. S., Wulandari, R., & Sriyadi. (2017). Analisis Usaha Industri Tahu di Desa Trimurti Kecamatan Srandakan Kabupaten Bantul. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 1–15. https://repository.umy.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/14494/m.%20NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI.pdf?

Badan pusat statistik. (2023). Kabupaten Bantul dalam Angka 2023. In Susanto (Ed.), BPS Bantul: Vol. (Issue, p. 350). BPS Bantul. https://yogyakarta.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/026aad493ec54b735d608483/provinsi-di-yogyakarta-dalam-angka-2023.html

Deville, N. V., Tomasso, L. P., Stoddard, O. P., Wilt, G. E., Horton, T. H., Wolf, K. L., Brymer, E., Kahn, P. H., & James, P. (2021). Time spent in nature is associated with increased pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147498

Dinas Kesehatan Kota Yogyakarta. (2023). Marsekal (Masyarakat Sedayu Kelola Lingkungan). Dinas Kesehatan Kota Yogyakarta. https://dinkes.jogjaprov.go.id/berita/detail/marsekal-masyarakat-sedayu-kelola-lingkungan

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten Bantul. (2020). Dokumen Informasi Kinerja Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah (DIKPLHD) (Issue, pp. 1–489). Dinas Lingkungan Hidup. https://yogyakarta.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/026aad493ec54b735d608483/provinsi-di-yogyakarta-dalam-angka-2023.html

Djaali, D., & Mulyono, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo. https://lib.unj.ac.id/buku/index.php?p=show_detail&id=26034&keywords=

Effendi, N. N., Widodo, R. A., & Afany, M. R. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kerusakan Lingkungan Bekas Galian Tanah Untuk Industri Batu Bata di Desa Potorono Banguntapan Analysis of The Environmental Damage Level From The Excavated Soil For Brick Industry In Potorono Banguntapan Bantul Prodi Agroteknologi , Unive. Jurnal Tanah Dan Air (Soil and Water Journal), 18(Juni), 28–36. http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/jta/index

Fang, W., Hassan, A., & Lepage, B. A. (2023). The Living Environmental Education, Sound Science Towars a Cleaner Safer, and Healthier Future. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4234-1

Fridtriyanda, A., Herniti, D., Pranajati, A., & Wicaksana, A. D. (2023). Analisis Kerusakan Lingkungan Fisik Pada Penambangan Pasir Sungai di Wilayah Kalurahan Sendangsari Kapanewon Pajangan, Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Rekayasa Lingkungan, 23(1), 17–26. https://journal.ity.ac.id/index.php/JRL/article/view/174

Ginting, F. W., Mellyzar, M., & Lukman, I. R. (2023). Analysis of Student Environmental Literacy: PjBL-Based Learning that is Integrated STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2599

Gul Mazloum Yar, F., & Ishaq Shaheedzooy, M. (2023). The Role of Environmental and Geographical Factors in the Education Process. Journal of World Science, 2(12), 2099–2017. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i12.492

Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J. R., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski, T. J., McBeth, W. C., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy. NAAE. Washington DC. https://cdn.naaee.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/devframewkassessenvlitonlineed.pdf

Keputusan Bupati Bantul No 333 Tahun 2023 Tentang Status Darurat Pengelolaan Sampah (pp. 1–9). (2023). Bupati Bantul. https://jdih.bantulkab.go.id/produkhukum/detail/5202/keputusan-bupati-tahun-2023-nomor-333.html

Kleespies, M. W., & Dierkes, P. W. (2023). Connection to nature for sustainable development at universities—What should be done? Frontiers in Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1249328

Liang, S. W., Fang, W. T., Yeh, S. C., Liu, S. Y., Tsai, H. M., Chou, J. Y., & Ng, E. (2018). A nationwide survey evaluating the environmental literacy of undergraduate students in Taiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061730

Lisan, A. R. K., & Jamaluddin. (2023). Evaluasi Dampak Pemotongan Lereng dan Pengerukan Kembali Untuk Pembuatan Lahan Kaveling Perumahan: Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Imogiri, Kabupaten Bantul Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20956/ecosolum.v12i1.26716

Lu, J. L., & Shon, Z. Y. (2012). Exploring airline passengers’ willingness to pay for carbon offsets. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.10.002

Maurer, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Modelling environmental literacy with environmental knowledge, values and (reported) behaviour. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65(February), 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100863

Pemerintah Kabupaten Bantul. (2020). Data Kabupaten Bantul. https://bantulkab.go.id/data_pokok/index/0000000028/data-umum.html

Priadi, A., Made Putrawan, I., & Artanti, G. D. (2020). Lecturers’ Knowledge About Environmental Issues, Personal Responsibility and Personality:Its Effect on Lecturers’ Intention to Act in Saving our Environment. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 11(1), 1848. https://doi.org/10.37506/v11/i1/2020/ijphrd/194121

Putra, N. S., Sukma, H. N., & Setiawan, H. (2021). Level of Environmental Literacy of Students and School Community in Green Open Space: Is There Any Difference Between Both of Them? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.31083

Ramadhan, S., Sukma, E., & Indriyani, V. (2019). Environmental education and disaster mitigation through language learning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 314(1). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/314/1/012054

Razali, G., Fatmawati, S., Hidayat, R., Farooq Mujahid, M. U., & Sheasby, J. (2022). Examining Factors that Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviour and Conscious between Rural and Urban Populations. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(07), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i07.126

Ridayani, Saputra, N., Siagian, N., Owon, R. A. S., & Rawadhy, I. (2022). The correlation of environmental education, environmental knowledge, environmental involvement, and waste management behavior. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1105(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1105/1/012008

Ruhimat, M., & Ruhimat, B. F. (2021). Relationship between environmental knowledge towards student’s attitude in environmental management. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 683(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/683/1/012048

Ruqoyyah, N. (2016). Analisis Literasi Lingkungan Siswa SMA Kelas X di Samboja Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi [Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. https://repository.upi.edu/26413/

Sarlita, R. (2022). Pengembangan E-Book Terintegrasi Potensi Lokal Lubuk Larangan Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Lingkungan dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/72217/

Septiyani, R., Prasetiyo, & Rahayu, P. (2022). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SNHP). Analisis Profil Literasi Lingkungan Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri Se-Kabupaten Demak, 3, 184–191. https://conference.upgris.ac.id/index.php/snhp/article/view/3434

Soemarti, L., & Kundrat, K. (2022). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Perubahan Perilaku Masyarakat dalam Pemanfaatan Sampah Domestik untuk Bahan Baku Pembuatan (MOL) Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Sanitasi Lingkungan dalam Mendukung Gerakan Indonesia Bersih. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 12(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.30999/jpkm.v12i2.2183

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. https://digilib.unigres.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=43

Sumirat, F., Sa’ud, U. S., Sopandi, W., & Supriatna, N. (2023). Brave to Green: Are There Environmental Literacy Problems in Rural Areas Public Elementary Schools? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 3758–3764. 10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3489

Susilawati, D., Diwanti, D. P., & Ningsih, E. R. (2023). Pengolahan Limbah Tahu Menjadi Pupuk Organik Cair Untuk Ecogreen Dan Optimalisasi Pemasaran Melalui Rebranding Umkm Tahu. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri), 7(5), 4469. https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v7i5.16953

Utama, P. B., & Fitriyani, S. (2022). Kajian Kerusakan Lingkungan Pada Perairan Sungai Bedog Akibat Pembuangan Limbah Batik Di Kabupaten Bantul. Hexagon Jurnal Teknik Dan Sains, 3(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.36761/hexagon.v3i1.1341

Veisi, H., Lacy, M., Mafakheri, S., & Razaghi, F. (2019). Assessing environmental literacy of university students: A case study of Shahid Beheshti University in Iran. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 18(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2018.1431163

Wardani, R. A. K., Karyanto, P., & Ramli, M. (2018). Analysis of high school students’ environmental literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012057

Wulandari, N. E., & Roshayanti, F. (2022). Profil Literasi Lingkungan Siswa Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Demak. Jurnal Kualita Pendidikan, 3(1), 16–20. https://journal.kualitama.com/index.php/jkp/article/view/156/168

Wyss, A. M., Knoch, D., & Berger, S. (2022). When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79(February 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101748

Yadav, S. K., Banerjee, A., Jhariya, M. K., Meena, R. S., Raj, A., Khan, N., Kumar, S., & Sheoran, S. (2022). Chapter 19 - Environmental education for sustainable development. Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability, 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822976-7.00010-7

Zhao, Y., Sheng, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, H., Chilufya, M. M., Liu, X., Mohamed, A. O., Han, J., & Qu, C. (2022). Influencing factors of residents’ environmental health literacy in Shaanxi province, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12561-x

Zheng, Q. ., Xu, A. ., Kong, D. ., Deng, H. ., & Lin, Q. . (2018). Correlation Between The Environmental Knowledge , Environmental Attitude , And Behavioral Intention of Tourists For Ecotourism In China. Applied Ecology And Environmental Research, 16(1), 51–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1601_051062

Downloads

Published

2024-12-05

Issue

Section

Environmental Education and Literacy