TPACK profile of biology teachers in the industrial revolution 4.0 era

Authors

  • Yenny Anwar Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Selvi Riyanti Biology Education Bachelor's Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Sapira Permata Dewi Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3.37006

Keywords:

Biology teachers, CoRe & TPaP-eRs, growing TPACK, maturing TPACK, pre-TPACK

Abstract

Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) is very important in the process of developing professional teacher competencies in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. The purpose of this study was to determine the profile of biology teachers TPACK on the classification of living things. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. Data collection techniques were carried out using questionnaires, CoRe&TPaP-eRs, and interviews. The sample was compiled using a saturated sampling technique with a total of ten respondents. The results indicated that biology teachers' TPACK skills must be improved. The results of the questionnaire consisting of 7 TPACK components, reaching 70.11% were categorized as good. The TK, PK, CK, and PCK components are in the excellent category, while the TCK, TPK, and TPACK components are still in the good category. The results of the CoRe & TPaP-eRs instrument covering 5 aspects show that the average of teacher’s TPACK reached 41%, in the Growing-TPACK category. The TPACK of biology teachers based on teaching experience is not so different. The results show that the length of teaching experience is not directly proportional to the growth of TPACK skills.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adipat, S., Chotikapanich, R., Laksana, K., Busayanon, K., Piatanom, P., Ausawasowan, A., & Elbasouni, I. (2023). Technological pedagogical content knowledge for professional teacher development. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0015

Adnan, A., & Yunisari, C. (2023). TPACK: Teachers’ needs. Ta’dib, 26(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v26i1.9072

Antink-Meyer, A., & Meyer, D. Z. (2016). Science teachers’ misconceptions in science and engineering distinctions: Reflections on modern research examples. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 625–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9478-z

Anwar, Y. (2014). Perkembangan Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) calon guru biologi pada peserta pendekatan konsekutif dan pada peserta pendekatan konkuren [Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. https://repository.upi.edu/12502/

Cavanagh, R. F., & Koehler, M. J. (2013). A Turn toward Specifying Validity Criteria in the Measurement of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782616

Colón, A. M. O., Rus, T. I., Moreno, J. R., & Montoro, M. A. (2023). TPACK model as a framework for in-service teacher training. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep439. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13279

Dias-da-Silva, C. D. (2019). Aristotle’s and the classification of living beings: Historical review and contributions to science teaching Clécio. UNISANTA Bioscience, 7(4), 366–378. https://periodicos.unisanta.br/index.php/bio/article/view/1456/0

Dirsa, A., Anggreni, S., Diananseri, C., & Setiawan, I. (2022). Teacher role as professional educator in school environment. International Journal of Science Education and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.58291/ijsecs.v1i1.25

Elayyan, S. (2021). The future of education according to the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.737193

Elvianasti, M., Rahmadani, M., Meitiyani, M., & Sari, P. M. (2023). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) prospective biology teachers in distance learning. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v4i2.191

Harris, J. B., Hofer, M. J., Schmidt, D. A., Blanchard, M. R., Young, C. Y., & Van Olphen, M. (2010). Technology integration: Instructional planning using curriculum-based activity type taxonomies. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 573–605. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=tedfacpub

Hidayat, T., Putri, A. R. A., & Purwaningsih, W. (2024). TPACK profile of biology teachers during their learning process after participating in numerical taxonomy and its training program. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15909

Ilori, M. O., & Ajagunna, I. (2020). Re-imagining the future of education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 12(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-10-2019-0066

Kara, S. (2023). The role of epistemic curiosity in developing EFL learners’ grammar and pronunciation skills. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 12(66), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.66.06.1

Kestiani, J., Riandi, R., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Analysis technological pedagogical content knowledge ability of teachers. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-18.2018.59

Kiray, S. A. (2016). Development of a TPACK self-efficacy scale for preservice science teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.64750

Koumiti, H., Laanoui, M. D., & Selmaoui, S. (2024). The role of technology in global learning transformation: A comprehensive overview. 2024 International Conference on Global Aeronautical Engineering and Satellite Technology (GAST), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/GAST60528.2024.10520745

Lestari, W., & Mulianingsih, F. (2020). Analisis pemahaman kompetensi pedagogik dan kompetensi profesional pada guru IPS di kecamatan Bawen kabupaten Semarang. Harmony: Jurnal Pembelajaran IPS Dan PKN, 5(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/harmony.v5i1.40293

Li, G., Hou, Y., & Wu, A. (2017). Fourth industrial revolution: Technological drivers, impacts and coping methods. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(4), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-017-0890-x

Limbong, E. (2016). The voices of preservice EFL teachers on the implementation of teacher educators. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 3(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v3i2.5511

Manishimwe, H., Shivoga, W. A., & Nsengimana, V. (2021). The role of innovative teaching and learning methods towards the classification of living things: A review. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 17(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v17i1.5

Mutiani, M., Supriatna, N., Abbas, E. W., Rini, T. P. W., & Subiyakto, B. (2021). Technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK): a discursions in learning innovation on social studies. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 2(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.20527/iis.v2i2.3073

Noh, N. M., Halili, S. H., & Siraj, S. (2020). Analisis faktor kekangan pembelajaran berasaskan reka bentuk dalam kalangan guru berdasarkan Fuzzy Delphi Method. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 8(1), 33–42. https://jupidi.um.edu.my/index.php/JUKU/article/view/22200

Putri, A. R. A., Hidayat, T., & Purwianingsih, W. (2020). Pelatihan taksonomi numerik sebagai strategi untuk meningkatkan technological pedagogical content knowledge guru biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 7(2), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v7i2.14332

Ramdiah, S., Abidinsyah, A., Royani, M., & Husamah, H. (2019). Understanding, planning, and implementation of HOTS by senior high school biology teachers in Banjarmasin-Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1). http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2019_1_28.pdf

Ranbir, R. (2024). Educational technology integration: Challenges and opportunities. Innovative Research Thoughts, 10(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v10.i2.1406

Riadi, M. E., Biyanto, B., & Prasetiya, B. (2022). The effectiveness of teacher professionalism in improving the quality of education. KnE Social Sciences, 517–527. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i10.11253

Riyanti, S., & Anwar, Y. (2023). Tinjauan metode dan instrumen: TPACK terhadap pengukuran calon guru dalam pendidikan. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v12i2.73723

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586

Sonsupap, K., Cojorn, K., & Sitti, S. (2024). The effects of teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) on students’ scientific competency. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(5), 91. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n5p91

Stefan, V., Duica, M. C., & Condratchi, L. (2020). Promoting creativity and innovative spirit in the learning process through advanced web-based technologies. International Conference Globalization, Innovation and Development. Trends and Prospects (G.I.D.T.P.), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gidtp2018/39

Sugiyono, S. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. https://inlislite.uin-suska.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=26594

Suryawati, E., Linggasari, M. N., & Arnentis, A. (2017). Technological pedagogical profile content knowledge (TPCK) prospective students FKIP Biology teacher University of Riau. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(3), 498. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i3.11270

Suyanto, S., Nurcahyo, H., & Mercuriani, I. (2019). Comparative study on the development of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of biology teacher through academic and professional program. International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 10(1), 41–53. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/131930139/penelitian/Comparative study on TPACK.pdf

Tri, N. M., Hoang, P. D., & Dung, N. T. (2021). Impact of the industrial revolution 4.0 on higher education in Vietnam: challenges and opportunities. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1350

Valeyeva, N. S., Kupriyanov, R. V., Valeeva, E., & Kraysman, N. V. (2020). Influence of the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) on the system of the engineering education. The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education. ICL 2019., 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40271-6_32

Williams, D. M. (2024). Biological classification. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (pp. 579–593). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822562-2.00039-6

Yahaya, N. I. S., Sapian, N. I. H., Razak, I. S. A., & Ishar, M. I. M. (2021). Impact of technology progress on human development in the era of industrial revolution 4.0. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(2), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i2.661

Downloads

Published

2024-11-20

Issue

Section

Academic Achievement and Learning Difficulties