Parents’ perceptions on previous and current science education system in Japan

Authors

  • Kseniya Fomichova Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Takeda, Kofu, Yamanashi
  • Taku Misonou Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Takeda, Kofu, Yamanashi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5702

Keywords:

Adolescents’ perceptions, parents’ perceptions, science education

Abstract

Parents’ views, beliefs, and experiences greatly affect children’s attitudes toward education. The research aimed to identify the parents’ perception in the past, present, and their desired priorities in science education as well as investigated the adolescents’ perceptions based on gender and academic performance on science. As a survey study, this research relied on a questionnaire as the primary method of data collection which the data gained then was analysed by using statistical descriptive (percentage). The results showed that the priorities in education have shifted toward physics and chemistry in recent decades. Moreover, biology and earth science were found to be perceived as ‘easy’ and ‘secondary’ areas in comparison to the ‘superior’ ones (physics and chemistry). This has been strengthened by the critical situation for earth science, as the education system of Japan often does not al low the students to select it. Thus, the parents wished for a more balanced system. There was a difference in adolescents’ perceptions of science areas based on gender and academic performance. Physics and chemistry were associated with boys and top performers, while biology and earth science were supposed to ‘fit’ girls and low performers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrington, B. L. & Hendriks, B. (1988). Attitudes towards science and science knowledge of intellectually gifted and average students in third, seventh and eleventh grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 8, 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250806

Carnevale A.P., Cheah B. & Strohl J. (2012). Hard times, college majors, unemployment and earnings: Not all college degrees are created equal. Center on Education and the Workforce. Georgetown University, Washington

Chang, S., Yeung, Y. & Cheng, M. (2009). Ninth graders’ learning interests, life experiences and attitudes towards science & technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 447-457.

Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The public understanding of science. Nature, 340(6228), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/340011a0

Ecklund, E. H., Lincoln, A. E., & Tansey, C. (2012). Gender segregation in elite academic science. Gender & Society, 26(5), 693-717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212451904

Fomichova, K., & Misonou, T. (2015). Teachers’ assessment of biology education in comparison to other areas of science in lower secondary schools of Japan - A case study. Asian Journal of Biology Education, 8.

Hadden, R. A., & Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Primary school pupils’ attitudes to science: The years of formation. European Journal of Science Education, 4(4), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528820040406

Hadden, R. A., & Johnstone, A. H. (1983). Secondary school pupils’ attitudes to science: The year of erosion. European Journal of Science Education, 5(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528830050306

Hu, E. (April 15, 2015). The all-work, no-play culture of South Korean Education. NPR.org. Retrieved from: http://www.npr. org/sections/parallels/2015/04/15/393939759/the-all-work-no-play-culture-of-south-korean-education

Holbrook, J., Mukherjee, A., & Varma, V. S. (2000). Scientific and technological literacy for all. Materials from the UNESCO-ICASE-CSEC Workshops. Centre for Science Education and Communication, University of Delhi.

Mann, A., & DiPrete, T. A. (2013). Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors. Social science research, 42(6), 1519-1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. The Netherlands.

Meyers-Levy, J., & Loken, B. (2015). Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.003

Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13(3), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504044908

Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479.

Ogawa, M. (2001). Reform Japanese style: Voyage into an unknown and chaotic future. Science Education, 85(5), 586-606. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1025

Ontong, K., & Le Grange, L. (2015). The reconceptualisation of sustainability after the decade of education for sustainable development. Tydskrif vir Geestesweten skappe, 55(1), 50-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2015/V55N1A4

Osborne, J., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003) 'Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications', International Journal of Science Education, 25, 9, 1049 – 1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Oscarsson, M., Jidesjö, A., Strömdahl, H. & Karlsson, K-G. (2009). Science in society or science in school: Swedish secondary school science teachers’ beliefs about science and science lessons in comparison with what their students want to learn. NorDiNa, 5(1), 18-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/nordina.280

Paton, G. (May 16, 2012). Schools 'shun traditional values in race for exam results. Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9268176/Schools-shun-traditional-values-in-race-for-exam-results.html

Piburn, M. D., & Baker, D. R. (1993). If I were the teacher… qualitative study of attitude toward science. Science Education, 77(4), 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770404

Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2003). Gender and physics. International journal of science education, 25(4), 509-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000017270

Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69(4), 511-525. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730690407

Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1-31.

Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public understanding of science, 13(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690

Wals, A. (2013). Sustainability in higher education in the context of the UN DESD: a review of learning and institutionalization processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.007

Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta‐analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in science Teaching, 32(4), 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320407

Downloads

Published

2018-07-09

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): JULY

Section

Holistic Learning

License

Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.