The relationship between personal responsibility and pro-environmental intention in high schools' students


  • Ahsanul Akhsan Dasi Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Pemuda No.10, RT.8/RW.5, Rawamangun, Pulo Gadung, Kota Jakarta Timur, the Special Capital Territory of Jakarta (DKI, Jakarta) 13220
  • Mieke Miarsyah Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Pemuda No.10, RT.8/RW.5, Rawamangun, Pulo Gadung, Kota Jakarta Timur, the Special Capital Territory of Jakarta (DKI, Jakarta) 13220
  • Rusdi Rusdi Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jl. Pemuda No.10, RT.8/RW.5, Rawamangun, Pulo Gadung, Kota Jakarta Timur, the Special Capital Territory of Jakarta (DKI, Jakarta) 13220



Personal responsibility, pro-environmental intention, problem solving


The role of personal responsibility is important to foster a pro-environmental intention can change students' pro-environmental behavior. This study aims to analyze the relationship between personal responsibility and pro-environmental intention in XI-MIPA students at SSHS of 8 Makassar, South Sulawesi. This study used a quantitative approach with a descriptive method of correlation techniques. Partisipants for study were 120 students. Data collection used non-test instruments. Analysis of research data used a regression model test (α = 0.05) and coefficient test with Pearson Product Moment test (α = 0.05). The results showed that there was a positive relationship between personal responsibility and pro-environmental intention. Students who have a high personal responsibility have several advantages, namely (1) can learned how to respect the rights and feelings of others, decide their own desires and the importance of being responsible; (2) able to become independent learners, able to play an active role in learning  and their desires more responsibly, and (3) can learn how to respect the rights and feelings of others, decide their own desires and the importance of being responsible.


Anand, S. V. (2013). Global environmental issues. Open Access Scientefic Reports, 2(2), 1–9. doi: https://

Ashurst, P. R., Hargitt, R., & Palmer, F. (2017). Environmental issues. In P. R. Ashurst, R. Hargitt, & F. Palmer (Eds.), Soft drink and fruit juice problems solved (2nd Ed., pp. 195–199). Woodhead Publishing. doi:

Aunger, R., & Curtis, V. (2016). Behaviour centred design: towards an applied science of behaviour change. Health Psychology Review, 10(4), 425–446. doi:

Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W., & Courchamp, F. (2014). Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 15(4), 365–377. doi:

Bennet, T. (2017). Creating a culture: How school leaders can optimise behaviour. UK Department for Education. London: Department for Education (DfE). Retrieved from login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED574131&site=ehost-live

Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C.-S., & Haynes, O. M. (2011). Maternal personality, parenting cognitions and parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 47(3), 658–675. doi:

Boysen, P. G. (2013). Just culture: a foundation for balanced accountability and patient safety. The Ochsner Journal, 13(3), 400–406. Retrieved from //

Bronfman, N. C., Cisternas, P. C., López-Vázquez, E., De la Maza, C., & Oyanedel, J. C. (2015). Understanding attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors in a Chilean community. Sustainability, 7(10), 14133–14152. doi:

Curtis, D. J., Reid, N., & Reeve, I. (2014). Towards ecological sustainability: Observations on the role of the arts. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment & Society, 7(1), 1–15. Retrieved from

Dementiy, L. I., & Grogoleva, O. Y. (2016). The structure of responsibility of preschool and primary school age children. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 233, pp. 372–376). doi:

Ernst, J., Blood, N., & Beery, T. (2015). Environmental action and student environmental leaders : exploring the influence of environmental attitudes, locus of control, and sense of personal responsibility. Environmental Education Research, 4622(September), 1–27. doi: 2015.1068278

Fedele, G., Locatelli, B., Djoudi, H., & Colloff, M. J. (2018). Reducing risks by transforming landscapes: Cross-scale effects of land-use changes on ecosystem services. PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1–21. doi:

Harris, U. S. (2019). Participatory media in environmental communication: Engaging communities in the periphery (1st Ed.). New York, US: Routledge. Retrieved from

Hasnat, G. N. T., Kabir, M. A., & Hossain, M. A. (2018). Major environmental issues and problems of South Asia, Particularly Bangladesh. In C. M. Hussain (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental Materials Management (pp. 1–40). Switzerland: Springer Natrure. doi:

Hope, A. L. B., & Jones, C. R. (2014). The impact of religious faith on attitudes to environmental issues and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies: A mixed methods study. Technology in Society, 38, 48–59. doi:

Johnson, K., Courser, M., Holder, H., Miller, B., Ogilvie, K., Moore, R., … Saylor, B. (2007). A community prevention intervention to reduce youth from inhaling and ingesting harmful legal products. Journal of Drug Education, 37(3), 227–247. doi:

Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review (Vol. 3). Holy Spirit University of Kaslik. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001

Kanianska, R. (2016). Agriculture and its impact on land‐use, environment, and ecosystem services. In A. Almusaed (Ed.), Landscape ecology - The influences of land use and anthropogenic impacts of landscape creation (pp. 1–26). IntechOpen. doi:

Keshavarz, M., & Karami, E. (2016). Farmers’ pro-environmental behavior under drought: Application of protection motivation theory. Journal of Arid Environments, 127, 128–136. doi:

Kinzig, A. P., Alston, L. J., Barrett, S., Nw, C. R., Levin, B., & Levin, S. (2013). Social norms and global environmental challenges: The complex interaction of behaviors, values, and policy. Bioscience, 63(3), 164–175. doi:

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. doi:

Manstead, A. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. doi: 1111/bjso.12251

Martin, J.-L., Maris, V., & Simberloff, D. S. (2016). The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Vol. 113, pp. 6105–6112). doi:

Mergler, A. (2008). Personal responsibility: The creation, implementation and evaluation of a school-based program. Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from

Mergler, A., & Patton, W. (2007). Adolescents talking about personal responsibility. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1(1), 57–70. doi:

Mergler, A., & Shield, P. (2016). Development of the personal responsibility scale for adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 51, 50–57. doi:

Michie, S., West, R., Sheals, K., & Godinho, C. A. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: A scoping review of methods used. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 8(2), 212–224. doi:

Pan, S., Chou, J., Morrison, A. M., & Lin, M. (2018). Will the future be greener? The environmental behavioral intentions of university tourism students. Sustainability, 10(634), 1–17. doi: su10030634

Pickard, H. (2014). Responsibility without blame: Therapy, philosophy, law. Prison Service Journal, 213, 10–16. Retrieved from

Rechkemmer, A., & Von Falkenhayn, L. (2009). The human dimensions of global environmental change: Ecosystem services, resilience, and governance. In EPJ Web of Conferences (Vol. 1, pp. 3–17). EDP Sciences. doi:

Sadhu, S. D., Garg, M., & Kumar, A. (2018). Major environmental issues and new materials. In C. M. Hussain & A. K. Mishra (Eds.), New polymer nanocomposites for environmental remediation (pp. 77–97). Elsevier. doi:

Seebacher, F., & Franklin, C. E. (2012). Determining environmental causes of biological effects: The need for a mechanistic physiological dimension in conservation biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1596), 1607–1614. doi:

Slavoljub, J., Dragica, G., Zorica, P. S., Zivkovic, L., & Sladjana, A. (2015). To the environmental responsibility among students through developing their environmental values. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 171, pp. 317–322). doi:

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. A. J. (2007). Human behavior and environmental sustainability: Problems, driving forces, and research topics. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 1–19. doi: 2007.00493.x

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. A. J. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. doi: jenvp.2008.10.004

United Nations Environment Programme. (2017). Towards a pollution-free planet. Nairobi, Kenya. Retrieved from versi on_Web.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. a, & Osgood, D. W. (2010). Examining trends in adolescent environmental attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors across three decades. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 61–85. doi:

Zastrow, C., Kirst-Ashman, K. K., & Hessenauer, S. L. (2019). Empowerment series: Understanding human behavior and the social environment (11th Ed.). Boston, MA.: Cengage Learning. Retrieved from






Environmental Education and Literacy