Understanding the bottlenecks in methodological adoption of constructivism in secondary schools in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7215Keywords:
Biology learning, constructivist teaching, education, pedagogyAbstract
Constructivist teaching and learning approach is one of teaching approach gaining popularity based on its principles of learner centered education. This study investigated the effectiveness of constructivist method of instruction on learning biology and challenges facing its implementation in secondary school students. The study design was quasi-experimental non-equivalent groups with a post-test examination. A total sample participated in this study was 477 students and 12 teachers. The instruments used in this study were; constructivist instruction manual, post-test, attitude questionnaire, and teacher’s questionnaire. The data collected was analyzed descriptively using mean and standard deviation values, while t-test and ANOVA were used to test the differences between group means at α=0.05 level. The study established that constructivist method of instruction was more effective in learning biology compared to conventional methods. Moreover, the both positive learner and negative teacher attitudes toward the application of constructivism was found as considerable as inadequate compulsory facilities in the implementation of constructivist learning approach. Thus, it is recommended to conduct deliberate programs in implementing constructivist learning approach in secondary schools in Kenya.
Downloads
References
Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 34(3), 243–257. doi: http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893
Allybokus, B. S. (2015). The implementation of learner-centred teaching in Mauritian state secondary schools : examining teachers ’ beliefs and classroom practice. Institute of Education University College London. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10021912/1/27 4 15- EdD Theisis FINAL .pdf
Andersen, I. G., & Andersen, S. C. (2017). Student-centered instruction and academic achievement: Linking mechanisms of educational inequality to schools’ instructional strategy. British Journal of Sociology of Education. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1093409
Bloom, L. (2000). Pushing the limits on theories of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65, 124–135. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.00100
Boruchovitch, E., & Ganda, D. R. (2013). Fostering self-regulated skills in an educational psychology course for Brazilian preservice teachers. Special Issue on Fostering Self-Regulated Learning in Intervention and Regular Teaching. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2018.00005/full
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Studies in science education students ’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Connell, G. L., Donovan, D. A., & Chambers, T. G. (2016). Increasing the use of student-centered pedagogies from moderate to high improves student learning and attitudes about biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(1), 1–15. doi: http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-03-0062
Dennick, R. (2016). Constructivism: Reflections on twenty five years teaching the constructivist approach in medical education. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 200–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5763.de11
Eilam, E., & Trop, T. (2012). Environmental attitudes and environmental behavior-which is the horse and which is the cart? Sustainability, 4(9), 2210–2246. doi: http://doi.org/10.3390/su4092210
Feyzioǧlu, E. Y. (2012). Science teachers’ beliefs as barriers to implementation of constructivist-based education reform. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(4), 302–317. Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol11/302-317.Feyzioglu_Vol.11_4.pdf
Gideon M. Mwanda, Paul Odundo, Ronnie Midigo, & Owino S. Mwanda. (2016). Adoption of the constructivist learning approach in secondary schools in Kenya: Focus on learner achievement in biology by class category. US-China Education Review A, 6(1), 31–44. doi: http://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623x/2016.01.003
Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., Kangas, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2015). Sociocultural perspectives on collaborative learning. The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning. London: Routledge. doi: http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837290.ch3
Hedden, M. K., Worthy, R., Akins, E., Slinger-Friedman, V., & Paul, R. C. (2017). Teaching sustainability using an active learning constructivist approach: Discipline-specific case studies in higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8), 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081320
Hsu, H. C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 1–16. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w
Izzo, M. V. (2012). Universal design for learning: Enhancing achievement of students with disabilities. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 14, pp. 343–350). doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.039
Jafari Amineh, R., & Davatgari Asl, H. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3890/3f4a7255496f75124d639e14e9b810c17370.pdf
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
Jepketer, A. (2017). Influence of teaching strategies on students’ performance in academic achievement and co-curricular activities in public secondary schools in Nandi county, Kenya. School of Education, Kenyatta University. Retrieved from https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/18368
Jidamva, G. B. (2012). Understanding and improving quality of secondary school, conceptions among teachers in Tanzania (1st ed.). Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademi University Press. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/28202912/Understanding_and_Improving_Quality_of_Secondary_School_Education_Conceptions_among_Teachers_in_Tanzania_Understanding_and_Improving_Quality_of_Secondary_School_Education_Conceptions_among_Teachers_in_Tanzania
Kharb, P., Samanta, P. P., Jindal, M., & Singh, V. (2013). The learning styles and the preferred teaching–Learning strategies of first year medical students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7(8), 1089–1092. doi: http://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/5809.3090
Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and Collective Knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 120–137. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1036273
Laal, M., Naseri, A. S., Laal, M., & Khattami-Kermanshahi, Z. (2013). What do we achieve from learning in collaboration? In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 93, pp. 1427–1432). doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.057
Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports. Retrieved from https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/Collaboration-Review.pdf
Lord, T. R. (1999). A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in environmental science. Journal of Environmental Education. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601874
McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
Mensah, E. (2015). Exploring constructivist perspectives in the college classroom. SAGE Open, 5(3), 1–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015596208
Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Schellens, T., & De Marez, L. (2015). Teaching and learning with mobile technology: A qualitative explorative study about the introduction of tablet devices in secondary education. PLoS ONE, 10(12), 1–17. doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144008
Mukhwana, W. J. (2016). How can institutional capacity be improved to bolster performance in biology in secondary schools ?: A focus on Eldoret Municipality, Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(11), 211–221. Retrieved from https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_11_November_2016/24.pdf
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn brain, mind, experience, and school - Early childhood development and Learning (Expanded E). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: http://doi.org/10.17226/9853
Ngesu, L. M., Gunga, S., Wachira, L., & Kaluku, E. N. (2014). Some determinants of students performance in biology in KCSE : A case of Central Division of Machakos District. International Journal of Innovative Research & Studies, 3(1), 174–186. Retrieved from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/71719
Nyongesa, K. W. (2015). A teachers perspective on the challenges in the delivery of content and performance in biology: A case of Bungoma District, Kenya. Kabarak Journal of Research & Innovation, 3(2), 23–42. Retrieved from http://eserver.kabarak.ac.ke:8082/ojs/index.php/journal1/article/view/86
Öhrstedt, M., & Lindfors, P. (2018). First-semester students’ capacity to predict academic achievement as related to approaches to learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1490950
Ouko, F. O., Anditi, Z. O., & Githua, B. N. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions on effectiveness of the KCSE biology practical assessment approach in testing experimenting skills in secondary schools in Siaya County, Kenya. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 34(2), 120–136. Retrieved from http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=7503&path%5B%5D=3540
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1964). The child’s conception of space. 55 Fifth Avenue, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/324620370/Jean-Piaget-The-Child-s-Conception-of-Space-pdf
Pillay, J. (2016). Keystone Life Orientation (LO) teachers: Implications for educational, social, and cultural contexts. South African Journal of Education, 32(2), 167–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v32n2a497
Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241. doi: http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.571
Shabani, K. (2016). Applications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural approach for teachers’ professional development. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–10. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1252177
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237–248. doi: http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237
Thomas, A., Menon, A., Boruff, J., Rodriguez, A. M., & Ahmed, S. (2014). Applications of social constructivist learning theories in knowledge translation for healthcare professionals: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 9(1), 1–20. doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-54
Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. M. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th Ed.). New York, US: Pearson. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.org/books/OL10085424M/Measurement_and_Evaluation_in_Psychology_and_Education_(8th_Edition)
Valderrama-Hernández, R., Alcántara, L., & Limón, D. (2017). The complexity of environmental education: Teaching ideas and strategies from teachers. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 237, pp. 968–974). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.137
van Riesen, S. A. N., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327–1344. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263
Verenikina, I. M. (2010). Vygotsky in Twenty-First-Century research. In J. Herrington & B. Hunter (Eds.), World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 16–25). Chesapeake, VA.: AACE. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2337&context=edupapers
Vidija, M. D. (2015). Impact of school based practical assessment on learner achievement in biology in secondary schools in Kakamega County , Kenya. Master of Education, University of Nairobi. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8c4a/5c89cc81733c4540d03e6d122c0b1f9b4f29.pdf
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://ouleft.org/wp-content/uploads/Vygotsky-Mind-in-Society.pdf
Wang, P. (2014). Teachers’ implementation of constructivist teaching: Does career motivation make a difference? ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from https://knowledge.library.iup.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2294&context=etd
Wang, L., Bruce, C., & Hughes, H. (2011). Sociocultural theories and their application in information literacy research and education. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 42(4), 296–308. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2011.10722242
Zenda, R. (2017). Essential teaching methods to enhance learner academic achievement in physical sciences in rural secondary schools: A South African case study. Information and Learning Science, 118(3–4), 1–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-03-2017-0014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JPBI, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
